睾丸假体--对生活质量和性功能的影响。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY Asian Journal of Andrology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-11 DOI:10.4103/aja202325
Ana Sofia Araújo, Sara Anacleto, Ricardo Rodrigues, Catarina Tinoco, Andreia Cardoso, Carlos Oliveira, Ricardo Leão
{"title":"睾丸假体--对生活质量和性功能的影响。","authors":"Ana Sofia Araújo, Sara Anacleto, Ricardo Rodrigues, Catarina Tinoco, Andreia Cardoso, Carlos Oliveira, Ricardo Leão","doi":"10.4103/aja202325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orchiectomy is the recommended treatment for many testicular conditions. However, testicular prosthesis placement is not always performed for different reasons. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients' opinions and the impact on sexual function and quality of life. This retrospective observational single-center study included patients who underwent orchiectomy between January 2014 and December 2020 at the Department of Urology, Braga's Hospital (Braga, Portugal), where testicular implants were always available and the decision to undergo the procedure was made fully independent of cost. Patients completed four questionnaires that assessed demographic data, satisfaction, self-esteem, and sexual function. Of the 96 patients who underwent orchidectomy, 59 replied to the questionnaires, and of these patients, 86.4% decided to undergo silicone-based testicular prostheses implantation. The remaining 13.6% refused the implant based on concerns about complications (37.5%), because they felt that it was unnecessary (37.5%), or because it was not offered by the doctor (25.0%). Overall, 96.1% of these patients were satisfied with the implant; however, 25.5% classified it as \"too firm\". No statistically significant differences were found in sexual function (all P > 0.05). However, it can be observed that there are more patients with prostheses presenting normal sexual activity compared to patients without prostheses (74.0% vs 50.0%), and none of them reported severe erectile dysfunction (0 vs 16.7%). Regarding self-esteem, both patients with and without prostheses present very similar average scores with no statistically significant differences. The present study highlights the highest level of satisfaction among patients who received testicular prostheses. Testicular prostheses implantation is a safe procedure that does not hamper sexual function after orchiectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8483,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Andrology","volume":" ","pages":"160-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10919427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testicular prostheses - impact on quality of life and sexual function.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Sofia Araújo, Sara Anacleto, Ricardo Rodrigues, Catarina Tinoco, Andreia Cardoso, Carlos Oliveira, Ricardo Leão\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aja202325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Orchiectomy is the recommended treatment for many testicular conditions. However, testicular prosthesis placement is not always performed for different reasons. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients' opinions and the impact on sexual function and quality of life. This retrospective observational single-center study included patients who underwent orchiectomy between January 2014 and December 2020 at the Department of Urology, Braga's Hospital (Braga, Portugal), where testicular implants were always available and the decision to undergo the procedure was made fully independent of cost. Patients completed four questionnaires that assessed demographic data, satisfaction, self-esteem, and sexual function. Of the 96 patients who underwent orchidectomy, 59 replied to the questionnaires, and of these patients, 86.4% decided to undergo silicone-based testicular prostheses implantation. The remaining 13.6% refused the implant based on concerns about complications (37.5%), because they felt that it was unnecessary (37.5%), or because it was not offered by the doctor (25.0%). Overall, 96.1% of these patients were satisfied with the implant; however, 25.5% classified it as \\\"too firm\\\". No statistically significant differences were found in sexual function (all P > 0.05). However, it can be observed that there are more patients with prostheses presenting normal sexual activity compared to patients without prostheses (74.0% vs 50.0%), and none of them reported severe erectile dysfunction (0 vs 16.7%). Regarding self-esteem, both patients with and without prostheses present very similar average scores with no statistically significant differences. The present study highlights the highest level of satisfaction among patients who received testicular prostheses. Testicular prostheses implantation is a safe procedure that does not hamper sexual function after orchiectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Andrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10919427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睾丸切除术是许多睾丸疾病的推荐治疗方法。然而,由于种种原因,睾丸假体置入术并不总是可行。本研究旨在评估患者的意见以及对性功能和生活质量的影响。这项回顾性观察性单中心研究纳入了2014年1月至2020年12月期间在布拉加医院(葡萄牙布拉加)泌尿科接受睾丸切除术的患者。患者填写了四份调查问卷,对人口统计学数据、满意度、自尊心和性功能进行了评估。在96名接受睾丸切除术的患者中,有59人回答了问卷,其中86.4%的患者决定接受硅胶睾丸假体植入术。其余 13.6% 的患者出于对并发症的担忧(37.5%)、认为没有必要(37.5%)或医生不建议(25.0%)而拒绝植入。总体而言,96.1% 的患者对植入物感到满意,但 25.5% 的患者认为植入物 "太硬"。性功能方面没有发现明显的统计学差异(P>0.05)。不过,可以观察到的是,与未安装假体的患者相比,安装了假体的患者中有更多人表现出正常的性活动(74.0% 对 50.0%),而且没有人报告有严重的勃起功能障碍(0 对 16.7%)。在自尊方面,安装假肢和未安装假肢的患者的平均得分非常接近,没有显著的统计学差异。本研究表明,接受睾丸假体的患者满意度最高。睾丸假体植入术是一种安全的手术,不会影响睾丸切除术后的性功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testicular prostheses - impact on quality of life and sexual function.

Orchiectomy is the recommended treatment for many testicular conditions. However, testicular prosthesis placement is not always performed for different reasons. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients' opinions and the impact on sexual function and quality of life. This retrospective observational single-center study included patients who underwent orchiectomy between January 2014 and December 2020 at the Department of Urology, Braga's Hospital (Braga, Portugal), where testicular implants were always available and the decision to undergo the procedure was made fully independent of cost. Patients completed four questionnaires that assessed demographic data, satisfaction, self-esteem, and sexual function. Of the 96 patients who underwent orchidectomy, 59 replied to the questionnaires, and of these patients, 86.4% decided to undergo silicone-based testicular prostheses implantation. The remaining 13.6% refused the implant based on concerns about complications (37.5%), because they felt that it was unnecessary (37.5%), or because it was not offered by the doctor (25.0%). Overall, 96.1% of these patients were satisfied with the implant; however, 25.5% classified it as "too firm". No statistically significant differences were found in sexual function (all P > 0.05). However, it can be observed that there are more patients with prostheses presenting normal sexual activity compared to patients without prostheses (74.0% vs 50.0%), and none of them reported severe erectile dysfunction (0 vs 16.7%). Regarding self-esteem, both patients with and without prostheses present very similar average scores with no statistically significant differences. The present study highlights the highest level of satisfaction among patients who received testicular prostheses. Testicular prostheses implantation is a safe procedure that does not hamper sexual function after orchiectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Andrology
Asian Journal of Andrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2252
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Fields of particular interest to the journal include, but are not limited to: -Sperm biology: cellular and molecular mechanisms- Male reproductive system: structure and function- Hormonal regulation of male reproduction- Male infertility: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prevention- Semen analysis & sperm functional assays- Sperm selection & quality and ART outcomes- Male sexual dysfunction- Male puberty development- Male ageing- Prostate diseases- Operational andrology- HIV & male reproductive tract infection- Male contraception- Environmental, lifestyle, genetic factors and male health- Male reproductive toxicology- Male sexual and reproductive health.
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of secondary penile cancer: a case series at a tertiary referral center in China. Testicular prostheses - impact on quality of life and sexual function. Clinical manifestations and spermatogenesis outcomes in Chinese patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism caused by inherited or de novo FGFR1 mutations Grafts in Peyronie’s surgery without the use of prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis N-acetylcysteine ameliorates erectile dysfunction in rats with hyperlipidemia by inhibiting oxidative stress and corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells phenotypic modulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1