评估老年人社会孤立和孤独感的工具:系统综述。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1684/pnv.2023.1102
Nadine Simo, Lidvine Godaert, Roxane Villeneuve, Jean-François Dartigues, Maturin Tabue Teguo, Moustapha Dramé
{"title":"评估老年人社会孤立和孤独感的工具:系统综述。","authors":"Nadine Simo,&nbsp;Lidvine Godaert,&nbsp;Roxane Villeneuve,&nbsp;Jean-François Dartigues,&nbsp;Maturin Tabue Teguo,&nbsp;Moustapha Dramé","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2023.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults who are socially isolated or who feel lonely have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. It is important to be able to assess them with efficient tools. The objective was to describe tools for assessing feelings of loneliness (FoL) and social isolation (SI) in older adults, and to estimate their prevalence. A systematic review was conducted including 18 studies. For FoL, the most frequently used tool was the UCLA Loneliness Scale. For SI, the most frequently used tool was the Lubben Social Network Scale. The median prevalences of FoL and SI were 24.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Both of these constructs will become more prominent in the coming decades; therefore, there is a need to identify the best tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51244,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","volume":"21 2","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tools for assessing social isolation and feelings of loneliness in older adults: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Simo,&nbsp;Lidvine Godaert,&nbsp;Roxane Villeneuve,&nbsp;Jean-François Dartigues,&nbsp;Maturin Tabue Teguo,&nbsp;Moustapha Dramé\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/pnv.2023.1102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults who are socially isolated or who feel lonely have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. It is important to be able to assess them with efficient tools. The objective was to describe tools for assessing feelings of loneliness (FoL) and social isolation (SI) in older adults, and to estimate their prevalence. A systematic review was conducted including 18 studies. For FoL, the most frequently used tool was the UCLA Loneliness Scale. For SI, the most frequently used tool was the Lubben Social Network Scale. The median prevalences of FoL and SI were 24.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Both of these constructs will become more prominent in the coming decades; therefore, there is a need to identify the best tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"241-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2023.1102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2023.1102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被社会孤立或感到孤独的老年人患病和死亡的风险更高。重要的是能够用有效的工具对它们进行评估。目的是描述评估老年人孤独感(FoL)和社会孤立感(SI)的工具,并估计其患病率。对18项研究进行了系统综述。对于FoL,最常用的工具是加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表。对于科学探究,最常用的工具是Lubben社交网络量表。FoL和SI的中位患病率分别为24.1%和42.5%。这两种结构在未来几十年将变得更加突出;因此,有必要确定最佳工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tools for assessing social isolation and feelings of loneliness in older adults: a systematic review.

Older adults who are socially isolated or who feel lonely have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. It is important to be able to assess them with efficient tools. The objective was to describe tools for assessing feelings of loneliness (FoL) and social isolation (SI) in older adults, and to estimate their prevalence. A systematic review was conducted including 18 studies. For FoL, the most frequently used tool was the UCLA Loneliness Scale. For SI, the most frequently used tool was the Lubben Social Network Scale. The median prevalences of FoL and SI were 24.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Both of these constructs will become more prominent in the coming decades; therefore, there is a need to identify the best tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: D''une qualité scientifique reconnue cette revue est, la première revue francophone gériatrique et psychologique indexée dans les principales bases de données internationales. Elle couvre tous les aspects médicaux, psychologiques, sanitaires et sociaux liés au suivi et à la prise en charge de la personne âgée. Que vous soyez psychologues, neurologues, psychiatres, gériatres, gérontologues,... vous trouverez à travers cette approche originale et unique, un veritable outil de formation, de réflexion et d''échanges indispensable à votre pratique professionnelle.
期刊最新文献
[Clostridioides difficile infections: Update and therapeutic guidelines]. [Prevalence and factors related to frailty dwelling home elderly -subjects using a modified SEGA scale: a study in primary care]. Fragility and quality of life, the benefits of physical activity for the elderly [SEGA frailty scale in emergency: back to basics]. [Geriatric failure to thrive: between illusory diagnosis and clinical reality].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1