同性收养法可以告诉我们美国的性别工资差距。

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Family and Economic Issues Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10834-022-09835-2
John Levendis, Aaron Lowen
{"title":"同性收养法可以告诉我们美国的性别工资差距。","authors":"John Levendis,&nbsp;Aaron Lowen","doi":"10.1007/s10834-022-09835-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender wage gaps are frequently explained as resulting from direct discrimination, employers' preferences over personality traits, and differing labor force attachment. We rely on a natural quasi-experiment using exogenous changes in state-level, same-sex adoption laws to distinguish between the competing explanations of the gender wage gap. Estimates from a differences-in-differences model show the wage gap between lesbians and heterosexual women shrank or inverted in those states which legalized adoption by same-sex couples. The wage gap did not change for men. This supports the parenthood hypothesis as a viable explanation for a portion of the gender wage gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"44 2","pages":"473-489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Same-Sex Adoption Laws Can Tell Us About the Gender Wage Gap in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"John Levendis,&nbsp;Aaron Lowen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10834-022-09835-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gender wage gaps are frequently explained as resulting from direct discrimination, employers' preferences over personality traits, and differing labor force attachment. We rely on a natural quasi-experiment using exogenous changes in state-level, same-sex adoption laws to distinguish between the competing explanations of the gender wage gap. Estimates from a differences-in-differences model show the wage gap between lesbians and heterosexual women shrank or inverted in those states which legalized adoption by same-sex couples. The wage gap did not change for men. This supports the parenthood hypothesis as a viable explanation for a portion of the gender wage gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family and Economic Issues\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"473-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family and Economic Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09835-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09835-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别工资差距通常被解释为直接歧视、雇主对人格特质的偏好以及不同的劳动力依恋。我们依靠一个自然的准实验,利用州一级同性收养法的外生变化来区分性别工资差距的相互竞争的解释。根据“差异中的差异”模型的估计,在那些同性伴侣收养子女合法化的州,女同性恋和异性恋女性之间的工资差距缩小或逆转。男性的工资差距没有改变。这支持了父母身份假说作为部分性别工资差距的可行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Same-Sex Adoption Laws Can Tell Us About the Gender Wage Gap in the United States.

Gender wage gaps are frequently explained as resulting from direct discrimination, employers' preferences over personality traits, and differing labor force attachment. We rely on a natural quasi-experiment using exogenous changes in state-level, same-sex adoption laws to distinguish between the competing explanations of the gender wage gap. Estimates from a differences-in-differences model show the wage gap between lesbians and heterosexual women shrank or inverted in those states which legalized adoption by same-sex couples. The wage gap did not change for men. This supports the parenthood hypothesis as a viable explanation for a portion of the gender wage gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
期刊最新文献
How Do Households Fare Economically When Mothers Become Their Primary Financial Support? Gender and the Economic Consequences of Divorce in the United States: Variation by Race and Ethnicity Financial Resilience in China: Conceptual Framework, Risk and Protective Factors, and Empirical Evidence “Their reality is different”: On the Intersection of Racial and Financial Socialization Evaluating the Effectiveness of Social Transfer Policies on Poverty for Children with Previous Experience in Poverty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1