“没有好的选择”:医院没有减少伤害策略的问题是什么?

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782218231186065
Cheryl Forchuk, Jonathan Serrato, Leanne Scott, Abraham Rudnick, Chandlee Dickey, Michael Silverman
{"title":"“没有好的选择”:医院没有减少伤害策略的问题是什么?","authors":"Cheryl Forchuk,&nbsp;Jonathan Serrato,&nbsp;Leanne Scott,&nbsp;Abraham Rudnick,&nbsp;Chandlee Dickey,&nbsp;Michael Silverman","doi":"10.1177/11782218231186065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231186065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/5a/10.1177_11782218231186065.PMC10354823.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"No Good Choice\\\": What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Forchuk,&nbsp;Jonathan Serrato,&nbsp;Leanne Scott,&nbsp;Abraham Rudnick,&nbsp;Chandlee Dickey,&nbsp;Michael Silverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11782218231186065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11782218231186065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/5a/10.1177_11782218231186065.PMC10354823.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231186065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231186065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管甲基苯丙胺的使用和随后的住院治疗有所增加,但加拿大大多数医院目前缺乏减少药物使用危害的战略。这可能意味着,有过甲基苯丙胺使用经历的人在入院时面临许多艰难的决定。照顾有过甲基苯丙胺使用经历的人也可能有问题,因为零容忍政策要求保持戒断。该分析旨在从有甲基苯丙胺使用经验的人以及卫生保健/服务专业人员的角度了解由于缺乏减少危害战略而造成的潜在卫生保健问题。方法:基于一项更大的研究,这一次要分析探讨了有甲基苯丙胺使用生活经验的人和卫生保健/服务专业人员讨论的关于在医院环境中提供减少危害方法的挑战的问题。共有108名有甲基苯丙胺使用生活经历的个人完成了混合方法访谈的定性部分。此外,31名保健/服务专业人员参加了虚拟焦点小组和一对一访谈。使用民族志主题方法分析了响应。结果:有甲基苯丙胺使用生活经历的人在入院时报告了3种选择:离开或避免住院,住院但经历无支持的戒断,或住院但向卫生保健专业人员隐瞒药物使用情况。卫生保健/服务专业人员描述了两种选择:坚持可能导致耻辱和缺乏有关成瘾知识的零容忍,或接受减少伤害但无法实施此类战略。由于政策和实践要求禁欲,这可能导致健康受到损害。两组参与者都没有为他们描述一个好的选择。结论:与药物使用相关的现行政策和教育需要修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"No Good Choice": What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?

Background: Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals.

Methods: Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach.

Results: People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them.

Conclusion: Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Substance Use Disorders on Suicidal Ideation, Planning, and Attempts: A Nationally Representative Study of Adolescents and Adults in the United States, 2020. Reconsidering the Terminology: Study Participants as "Subjects" or Not? Recovering Individuals' Feelings About Addict and Alcoholic as Stigmatized Terms: Implications for Treatment. Untrained Bystanders Administering Drone-Delivered Naloxone: An Exploratory Study. Integrated Supports for Women and Girls Experiencing Substance Use and Complex Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1