毛细管血液取样测定氯氮平浓度:分析验证和患者经验。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000494
Bianca D Breken, Koen P Grootens, Annemieke M Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel, Walter A Hermens, Hieronymus J Derijks
{"title":"毛细管血液取样测定氯氮平浓度:分析验证和患者经验。","authors":"Bianca D Breken, Koen P Grootens, Annemieke M Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel, Walter A Hermens, Hieronymus J Derijks","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients may be reluctant to start clozapine (CLZ) because of the frequent blood sampling needed for white blood cell monitoring, but also therapeutic drug monitoring of CLZ. Finger prick, instead of venepuncture, might lower the threshold to CLZ use. The aim of this study was to determine whether CLZ concentrations are the same in capillary and venous blood samples. Capillary blood was drawn by finger prick and collected in the Hem-Col tube. Paired capillary and venous blood samples were collected from inpatients and outpatients of a mental health institute. Patients were asked to rate pain, experience, and preference for blood sampling method. Passing-Bablok analysis of 40 paired samples showed that CLZ concentrations were statistically equal in capillary and venous samples {slope 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-1.04], intercept -6.86 (95% CI: -30.75 to 24.13)}. Venepuncture was the preferred method based on the experience ( P  = 0.009) and preference ( P  = 0.043) items. In conclusion, CLZ concentrations were similar in venous and capillary blood samples. Venepuncture appeared to be preferred to finger prick for blood sampling. Our results emphasize the importance of consulting patients' individual preference for blood sampling method.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capillary blood sampling for the determination of clozapine concentrations: analytical validation and patient experience.\",\"authors\":\"Bianca D Breken, Koen P Grootens, Annemieke M Vermeulen Windsant-van den Tweel, Walter A Hermens, Hieronymus J Derijks\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients may be reluctant to start clozapine (CLZ) because of the frequent blood sampling needed for white blood cell monitoring, but also therapeutic drug monitoring of CLZ. Finger prick, instead of venepuncture, might lower the threshold to CLZ use. The aim of this study was to determine whether CLZ concentrations are the same in capillary and venous blood samples. Capillary blood was drawn by finger prick and collected in the Hem-Col tube. Paired capillary and venous blood samples were collected from inpatients and outpatients of a mental health institute. Patients were asked to rate pain, experience, and preference for blood sampling method. Passing-Bablok analysis of 40 paired samples showed that CLZ concentrations were statistically equal in capillary and venous samples {slope 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-1.04], intercept -6.86 (95% CI: -30.75 to 24.13)}. Venepuncture was the preferred method based on the experience ( P  = 0.009) and preference ( P  = 0.043) items. In conclusion, CLZ concentrations were similar in venous and capillary blood samples. Venepuncture appeared to be preferred to finger prick for blood sampling. Our results emphasize the importance of consulting patients' individual preference for blood sampling method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000494\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

患者可能不愿意开始使用氯氮平(CLZ),因为需要频繁采血进行白细胞监测,同时也需要对CLZ进行治疗药物监测。手指刺破,而不是静脉穿刺,可能会降低使用CLZ的门槛。本研究的目的是确定CLZ浓度在毛细血管和静脉血样品中是否相同。采用手指穿刺法抽取毛细血管血,Hem-Col管采集。从精神卫生机构的住院患者和门诊患者中采集配对的毛细血管和静脉血样本。患者被要求对疼痛、经验和对采血方法的偏好进行评分。40个配对样本的passin - bablok分析显示,在毛细血管和静脉样本中CLZ浓度在统计学上相等{斜率0.96[95%可信区间(CI): 0.88-1.04],截距-6.86 (95% CI: -30.75 ~ 24.13)}。根据经验(P = 0.009)和偏好(P = 0.043)项,静脉穿刺是首选方法。结论:大鼠静脉血和毛细血管血CLZ浓度相近。静脉穿刺似乎比手指穿刺更适合采血。我们的研究结果强调了咨询患者对血液采样方法的个人偏好的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capillary blood sampling for the determination of clozapine concentrations: analytical validation and patient experience.

Patients may be reluctant to start clozapine (CLZ) because of the frequent blood sampling needed for white blood cell monitoring, but also therapeutic drug monitoring of CLZ. Finger prick, instead of venepuncture, might lower the threshold to CLZ use. The aim of this study was to determine whether CLZ concentrations are the same in capillary and venous blood samples. Capillary blood was drawn by finger prick and collected in the Hem-Col tube. Paired capillary and venous blood samples were collected from inpatients and outpatients of a mental health institute. Patients were asked to rate pain, experience, and preference for blood sampling method. Passing-Bablok analysis of 40 paired samples showed that CLZ concentrations were statistically equal in capillary and venous samples {slope 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-1.04], intercept -6.86 (95% CI: -30.75 to 24.13)}. Venepuncture was the preferred method based on the experience ( P  = 0.009) and preference ( P  = 0.043) items. In conclusion, CLZ concentrations were similar in venous and capillary blood samples. Venepuncture appeared to be preferred to finger prick for blood sampling. Our results emphasize the importance of consulting patients' individual preference for blood sampling method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of cariprazine for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of phase 2b/phase 3 clinical trials. Differed spontaneous dissociative symptoms following the use of esketamine intranasal spray in a patient suffering from treatment-resistant depression: a case report. Dropped-Head syndrome: a possible new variant of clozapine-induced inflammation during titration. Understanding mood disorder treatments. When antidepressants meet the gut microbiota: implications and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1