烟草、酒精和大麻体验问卷。希腊语翻译和测试-重复可靠性。

Q3 Medicine Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Pub Date : 2022-12-07 Epub Date: 2022-05-26 DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2022.082
Konstantinos Kollias, Lida-Alkisti Xenaki, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, Ilias Vlachos, Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos, Mirjana Selakovic, Irene Ralli, Angeliki-Aikaterini Ntigrintaki, Nikos Stefanis
{"title":"烟草、酒精和大麻体验问卷。希腊语翻译和测试-重复可靠性。","authors":"Konstantinos Kollias, Lida-Alkisti Xenaki, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, Ilias Vlachos, Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos, Mirjana Selakovic, Irene Ralli, Angeliki-Aikaterini Ntigrintaki, Nikos Stefanis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2022.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Tobacco and Alcohol Questionnaire (TAQ) and the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) are two instruments employed in the evaluation of substance use. The First Episode Psychosis (FEP) study in Athens employed two versions of those questionnaires, as part of a battery of psychometric tools, detecting environmental and genetic factors associated with FEP and addressed specifically to the distinctive characteristics of patients with FEP. The goal of the present study is to present those two versions, regarding their content, their use in international research, their translation in Greek, and their test-retest reliability. The two questionnaires were translated by two independent translators and administered to 32 subjects with FEP twice, in order to be tested for test-retest reliability. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between qualitative variables and ICC between quantitative variables. Significant agreement was found between the two measurements in all items of the TAQ version and almost all items of the CEQ version. Our study is an indication that both translations are reliable, although a more thorough test of their psychometric properties is needed. Both might be used in the Greek research field as part of a broad package of psychometric tools, specifically addressed to patients with FEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tobacco and Alcohol and Cannabis Experience Questionnaires. Greek translation and test-retest reliability.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Kollias, Lida-Alkisti Xenaki, Pentagiotissa Stefanatou, Ilias Vlachos, Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos, Mirjana Selakovic, Irene Ralli, Angeliki-Aikaterini Ntigrintaki, Nikos Stefanis\",\"doi\":\"10.22365/jpsych.2022.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Tobacco and Alcohol Questionnaire (TAQ) and the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) are two instruments employed in the evaluation of substance use. The First Episode Psychosis (FEP) study in Athens employed two versions of those questionnaires, as part of a battery of psychometric tools, detecting environmental and genetic factors associated with FEP and addressed specifically to the distinctive characteristics of patients with FEP. The goal of the present study is to present those two versions, regarding their content, their use in international research, their translation in Greek, and their test-retest reliability. The two questionnaires were translated by two independent translators and administered to 32 subjects with FEP twice, in order to be tested for test-retest reliability. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between qualitative variables and ICC between quantitative variables. Significant agreement was found between the two measurements in all items of the TAQ version and almost all items of the CEQ version. Our study is an indication that both translations are reliable, although a more thorough test of their psychometric properties is needed. Both might be used in the Greek research field as part of a broad package of psychometric tools, specifically addressed to patients with FEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2022.082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2022.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烟酒问卷(TAQ)和大麻经历问卷(CEQ)是评估药物使用情况的两种工具。雅典的首发精神病(FEP)研究采用了这两种问卷的两个版本,作为一系列心理测量工具的一部分,用于检测与首发精神病相关的环境和遗传因素,并专门针对首发精神病患者的独特特征。本研究的目的是介绍这两个版本的问卷内容、在国际研究中的使用情况、希腊语翻译以及测试-再测试的可靠性。这两份问卷由两名独立译者翻译,并对 32 名 FEP 受试者进行了两次测试,以检验其重测可靠性。科恩卡帕(Cohen's kappa)用于测量定性变量之间的一致性和定量变量之间的 ICC。结果发现,两种测量方法在 TAQ 版本的所有项目和 CEQ 版本的几乎所有项目之间都存在显著的一致性。我们的研究表明,这两种译本都是可靠的,尽管还需要对它们的心理测量特性进行更全面的测试。在希腊的研究领域中,这两种方法都可以作为一套广泛的心理测量工具的一部分来使用,特别是针对 FEP 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tobacco and Alcohol and Cannabis Experience Questionnaires. Greek translation and test-retest reliability.

The Tobacco and Alcohol Questionnaire (TAQ) and the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) are two instruments employed in the evaluation of substance use. The First Episode Psychosis (FEP) study in Athens employed two versions of those questionnaires, as part of a battery of psychometric tools, detecting environmental and genetic factors associated with FEP and addressed specifically to the distinctive characteristics of patients with FEP. The goal of the present study is to present those two versions, regarding their content, their use in international research, their translation in Greek, and their test-retest reliability. The two questionnaires were translated by two independent translators and administered to 32 subjects with FEP twice, in order to be tested for test-retest reliability. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between qualitative variables and ICC between quantitative variables. Significant agreement was found between the two measurements in all items of the TAQ version and almost all items of the CEQ version. Our study is an indication that both translations are reliable, although a more thorough test of their psychometric properties is needed. Both might be used in the Greek research field as part of a broad package of psychometric tools, specifically addressed to patients with FEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Parent Diabetes Distress Scale-Greek (PDDS-Gr). Knowledge, competence and educational needs of mental health staff on palliative care for the elderly with dementia. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on subjective sleep during lockdown: relation with resilience characteristics. Results of esketamine administration in a Greek population; A case series. Effects of antipsychotic medications in glucose and lipid metabolism at the fasted state in drug-naïve first episode patients with psychosis after six months and three years of treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1