重新审视作品的概念:一些概念、经验和临床考虑。

Q4 Psychology Psychodynamic Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.287
Graeme J Taylor, R Michael Bagby, Piero Porcelli
{"title":"重新审视作品的概念:一些概念、经验和临床考虑。","authors":"Graeme J Taylor,&nbsp;R Michael Bagby,&nbsp;Piero Porcelli","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of <i>pensée opératoire</i> (operational thinking) was introduced by French psychoanalysts in 1963 and a decade later was included as an essential component of the alexithymia construct as formulated by the U.S. analysts John Nemiah and Peter Sifneos. Despite a large body of research on alexithymia, the <i>pensée opératoire</i> component is not well understood, especially among clinicians and researchers who are not familiar with French psychoanalytic literature. In this article we clarify the definition and metapsychological conceptualization of the concept, review findings from some relevant empirical studies, and critique a recent proposal for redefining the alexithymia construct that departs from the original understanding of <i>pensée opératoire.</i> We also discuss some clinical implications of the concept and some strategies that psychotherapists can employ in the treatment of patients with this mode of thinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"51 3","pages":"287-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Concept of <i>Pensée Opératoire</i>: Some Conceptual, Empirical, and Clinical Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Graeme J Taylor,&nbsp;R Michael Bagby,&nbsp;Piero Porcelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of <i>pensée opératoire</i> (operational thinking) was introduced by French psychoanalysts in 1963 and a decade later was included as an essential component of the alexithymia construct as formulated by the U.S. analysts John Nemiah and Peter Sifneos. Despite a large body of research on alexithymia, the <i>pensée opératoire</i> component is not well understood, especially among clinicians and researchers who are not familiar with French psychoanalytic literature. In this article we clarify the definition and metapsychological conceptualization of the concept, review findings from some relevant empirical studies, and critique a recent proposal for redefining the alexithymia construct that departs from the original understanding of <i>pensée opératoire.</i> We also discuss some clinical implications of the concept and some strategies that psychotherapists can employ in the treatment of patients with this mode of thinking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"287-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

pensée opératoire(操作思维)的概念由法国精神分析学家于1963年提出,十年后被美国分析师John Nemiah和Peter Sifneos作为述情障碍结构的重要组成部分。尽管有大量关于述情障碍的研究,但对pensée opératoire成分的理解并不充分,尤其是在不熟悉法国精神分析文献的临床医生和研究人员中。在这篇文章中,我们澄清了述情障碍概念的定义和元心理学概念化,回顾了一些相关实证研究的结果,并批评了最近提出的重新定义述情障碍结构的建议,该建议偏离了对pensée opératoire的最初理解。我们还讨论了这个概念的一些临床意义,以及心理治疗师在治疗这种思维模式的患者时可以采用的一些策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the Concept of Pensée Opératoire: Some Conceptual, Empirical, and Clinical Considerations.

The concept of pensée opératoire (operational thinking) was introduced by French psychoanalysts in 1963 and a decade later was included as an essential component of the alexithymia construct as formulated by the U.S. analysts John Nemiah and Peter Sifneos. Despite a large body of research on alexithymia, the pensée opératoire component is not well understood, especially among clinicians and researchers who are not familiar with French psychoanalytic literature. In this article we clarify the definition and metapsychological conceptualization of the concept, review findings from some relevant empirical studies, and critique a recent proposal for redefining the alexithymia construct that departs from the original understanding of pensée opératoire. We also discuss some clinical implications of the concept and some strategies that psychotherapists can employ in the treatment of patients with this mode of thinking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
A Primer on Human Birth Theory. Addressing At-the-Moment Defenses against Painful Affects: A Core Mechanism of Change in Psychodynamic Treatment. Could Knowledge of Borderline Personality Disorder Benefit College Campus Mental Health? Demystifying Jung's "Archetypes" with Embodied Cognition. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1