Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Daniela Coclite, Daniela D'Angelo, Alice Josephine Fauci, Ornella Punzo, Antonello Napoletano, Primiano Iannone, Silvia Gianola
{"title":"知识，态度和障碍的意大利国家指导系统的发展临床实践指南:注册科学技术协会的横断面调查。","authors":"Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Daniela Coclite, Daniela D'Angelo, Alice Josephine Fauci, Ornella Punzo, Antonello Napoletano, Primiano Iannone, Silvia Gianola","doi":"10.4415/ANN_22_04_07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore knowledge, attitude, and barriers of the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG) for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among scientific-technical societies (STS) of health care professional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the STS registered in the Italian Ministry of Health (n = 336). The questionnaire consisted of three sections: Respondent characteristics; Perception, knowledge, attitude, and use of CPGs; Knowledge of the SNLG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey sample was 194 (57.7%) STS: 69% STS members stated they \"often consulted CPGs\". Two out of three STS perceived scientific activities as extremely important. Additionally, 20.6% STS had submitted at least one CPG to the SNLG platform after the Gelli-Bianco Law went into effect (median 1 CPG; interquartile range, IQR, 1-4). The most often cited barrier (62.7%) to CPG submission was limited economic resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STS members hold a positive attitude towards CPGs despite barriers to CPG development.</p>","PeriodicalId":8246,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, attitude and barriers of the Italian National Guidelines System for the development of clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional survey of registered scientific-technical societies.\",\"authors\":\"Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Daniela Coclite, Daniela D'Angelo, Alice Josephine Fauci, Ornella Punzo, Antonello Napoletano, Primiano Iannone, Silvia Gianola\",\"doi\":\"10.4415/ANN_22_04_07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore knowledge, attitude, and barriers of the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG) for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among scientific-technical societies (STS) of health care professional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the STS registered in the Italian Ministry of Health (n = 336). The questionnaire consisted of three sections: Respondent characteristics; Perception, knowledge, attitude, and use of CPGs; Knowledge of the SNLG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey sample was 194 (57.7%) STS: 69% STS members stated they \\\"often consulted CPGs\\\". Two out of three STS perceived scientific activities as extremely important. Additionally, 20.6% STS had submitted at least one CPG to the SNLG platform after the Gelli-Bianco Law went into effect (median 1 CPG; interquartile range, IQR, 1-4). The most often cited barrier (62.7%) to CPG submission was limited economic resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STS members hold a positive attitude towards CPGs despite barriers to CPG development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_22_04_07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_22_04_07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge, attitude and barriers of the Italian National Guidelines System for the development of clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional survey of registered scientific-technical societies.
Background: To explore knowledge, attitude, and barriers of the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG) for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among scientific-technical societies (STS) of health care professional.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the STS registered in the Italian Ministry of Health (n = 336). The questionnaire consisted of three sections: Respondent characteristics; Perception, knowledge, attitude, and use of CPGs; Knowledge of the SNLG.
Results: The survey sample was 194 (57.7%) STS: 69% STS members stated they "often consulted CPGs". Two out of three STS perceived scientific activities as extremely important. Additionally, 20.6% STS had submitted at least one CPG to the SNLG platform after the Gelli-Bianco Law went into effect (median 1 CPG; interquartile range, IQR, 1-4). The most often cited barrier (62.7%) to CPG submission was limited economic resources.
Conclusions: STS members hold a positive attitude towards CPGs despite barriers to CPG development.
期刊介绍：
Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità is a peer reviewed quarterly science journal which publishes research articles in biomedicine, translational research and in many other disciplines of the health sciences. The journal includes the following material: original articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials, brief and technical notes, book reviews.
The publication of Monographic Sections has been discontinued. In case you wish to present a small number of coordinated contributions on specific themes concerning priorities in public health, please contact the Editorial office.
The journal is in English.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
