接触性荨麻疹综合征:全面回顾。

IF 2.4 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Current Dermatology Reports Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0
Ana M Giménez-Arnau, David Pesqué, Howard I Maibach
{"title":"接触性荨麻疹综合征:全面回顾。","authors":"Ana M Giménez-Arnau, David Pesqué, Howard I Maibach","doi":"10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Contact urticaria syndrome includes contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Underreport, underdiagnosis, or misdiagnosis of entities within the contact urticaria syndrome is believed to be common, especially in the occupational setting. This review provides a structured overview of the entities comprised in this syndrome as well as the diagnostic work-up and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Contact urticaria syndrome has been increasingly described due to personal protective equipment and hand sanitizers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of legal cannabis products has led to a rise in occupational cases of contact urticaria to cannabis. A declining trend in the evolution of contact urticaria has been described for natural rubber latex allergy due to the use of synthetic gloves. Prick test has been proposed as a screening method, particularly if multiple products are to be tested, instead of the classical sequential scheme.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Physicians should be aware of the growing number of culprit agents leading to contact urticaria syndrome. Clinical presentation may be challenging since it includes immediate urticaria and/or eczema and even more generalized reactions. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, detailed occupational history, and complementary tests, including skin testing. The best treatment is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and to implement preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10838,"journal":{"name":"Current Dermatology Reports","volume":"11 4","pages":"194-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ana M Giménez-Arnau, David Pesqué, Howard I Maibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Contact urticaria syndrome includes contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Underreport, underdiagnosis, or misdiagnosis of entities within the contact urticaria syndrome is believed to be common, especially in the occupational setting. This review provides a structured overview of the entities comprised in this syndrome as well as the diagnostic work-up and management strategies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Contact urticaria syndrome has been increasingly described due to personal protective equipment and hand sanitizers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of legal cannabis products has led to a rise in occupational cases of contact urticaria to cannabis. A declining trend in the evolution of contact urticaria has been described for natural rubber latex allergy due to the use of synthetic gloves. Prick test has been proposed as a screening method, particularly if multiple products are to be tested, instead of the classical sequential scheme.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Physicians should be aware of the growing number of culprit agents leading to contact urticaria syndrome. Clinical presentation may be challenging since it includes immediate urticaria and/or eczema and even more generalized reactions. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, detailed occupational history, and complementary tests, including skin testing. The best treatment is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and to implement preventive measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Dermatology Reports\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"194-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Dermatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Dermatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:接触性荨麻疹综合征包括接触性荨麻疹和蛋白接触性皮炎。据信,接触性荨麻疹综合征中的实体报告不足、诊断不足或误诊的情况很常见,尤其是在职业环境中。本综述对接触性荨麻疹综合征所包含的实体以及诊断工作和管理策略进行了结构化概述:在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,接触性荨麻疹综合症的病因越来越多地归咎于个人防护设备和洗手液。合法大麻产品的使用导致了大麻接触性荨麻疹职业病例的增加。由于合成手套的使用,对天然橡胶乳胶过敏的接触性荨麻疹病例呈下降趋势。总结:医生应意识到导致接触性荨麻疹综合征的致病因子越来越多。临床表现可能具有挑战性,因为它包括即时性荨麻疹和/或湿疹,甚至更广泛的反应。诊断需要高度怀疑、详细的职业史和辅助检查,包括皮肤测试。最好的治疗方法是避免接触致病因子并采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.

Purpose of review: Contact urticaria syndrome includes contact urticaria and protein contact dermatitis. Underreport, underdiagnosis, or misdiagnosis of entities within the contact urticaria syndrome is believed to be common, especially in the occupational setting. This review provides a structured overview of the entities comprised in this syndrome as well as the diagnostic work-up and management strategies.

Recent findings: Contact urticaria syndrome has been increasingly described due to personal protective equipment and hand sanitizers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of legal cannabis products has led to a rise in occupational cases of contact urticaria to cannabis. A declining trend in the evolution of contact urticaria has been described for natural rubber latex allergy due to the use of synthetic gloves. Prick test has been proposed as a screening method, particularly if multiple products are to be tested, instead of the classical sequential scheme.

Summary: Physicians should be aware of the growing number of culprit agents leading to contact urticaria syndrome. Clinical presentation may be challenging since it includes immediate urticaria and/or eczema and even more generalized reactions. Diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion, detailed occupational history, and complementary tests, including skin testing. The best treatment is to avoid contact with the culprit agent and to implement preventive measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most significant recent developments in the field of dermatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by expert international authors, the journal aims to serve all those involved in the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of dermatologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field, such as epidemiology, surgery, pharmacology, clinical trial design, and pediatrics. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 20 internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
期刊最新文献
Skin Type Diversity in Skin Lesion Datasets: A Review. Teledermatology Lessons During the COVID-19 Pandemic Mpox: Diagnosis and Management for the Inpatient Dermatologist Inpatient Evaluation and Management of Generalized Pustular Dermatoses Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Systemic Side Effects: Overview for the Inpatient Dermatologist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1