改进急诊医学快速评分在颅脑外伤患者和非颅脑外伤患者中的应用

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000645
Genesis de Souza Barbosa, Juliane de Oliveira Gaspar, Lilia de Souza Nogueira, Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira, Kézia Porto Lima, Regina Márcia Cardoso de Sousa
{"title":"改进急诊医学快速评分在颅脑外伤患者和非颅脑外伤患者中的应用","authors":"Genesis de Souza Barbosa,&nbsp;Juliane de Oliveira Gaspar,&nbsp;Lilia de Souza Nogueira,&nbsp;Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira,&nbsp;Kézia Porto Lima,&nbsp;Regina Márcia Cardoso de Sousa","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: The modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) is a recently published index to estimate the severity of trauma patients; however, little is known about its performance in patients with different types of trauma. This study verified the predictive capacity of mREMS in-hospital mortality in patients of blunt and penetrating trauma with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the performance of this index compared with the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score. METHODS: This is a retrospective, correlational study that analyzed trauma patients 18 years or older, who attended at a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied in the analyses. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 987 patients, 359 (36.4%) with TBI (225 blunt and 134 penetrating trauma). Regarding mREMS, the area under the ROC curve for TBI patients for in-hospital mortality was 0.506 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.404-0.609) for penetrating injuries and 0.486 (95% CI, 0.402-0.571) for blunt injuries; the values in patients without TBI were 0.629 (95% CI, 0.554-0.703) and 0.618 (95% CI, 0.552-0.684), respectively. In relation to the other indices the mREMS presented the lowest area under the curve/ROC for penetrating and blunt TBI, and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score for extracranial injuries. CONCLUSION: The mREMS showed no prognostic capacity for patients with TBI, and it presented the worst performance in relation to the Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score to discriminate cases of in-hospital mortality when considering trauma patients with and without TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 3","pages":"130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score in Patients With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Genesis de Souza Barbosa,&nbsp;Juliane de Oliveira Gaspar,&nbsp;Lilia de Souza Nogueira,&nbsp;Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira,&nbsp;Kézia Porto Lima,&nbsp;Regina Márcia Cardoso de Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: The modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) is a recently published index to estimate the severity of trauma patients; however, little is known about its performance in patients with different types of trauma. This study verified the predictive capacity of mREMS in-hospital mortality in patients of blunt and penetrating trauma with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the performance of this index compared with the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score. METHODS: This is a retrospective, correlational study that analyzed trauma patients 18 years or older, who attended at a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied in the analyses. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 987 patients, 359 (36.4%) with TBI (225 blunt and 134 penetrating trauma). Regarding mREMS, the area under the ROC curve for TBI patients for in-hospital mortality was 0.506 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.404-0.609) for penetrating injuries and 0.486 (95% CI, 0.402-0.571) for blunt injuries; the values in patients without TBI were 0.629 (95% CI, 0.554-0.703) and 0.618 (95% CI, 0.552-0.684), respectively. In relation to the other indices the mREMS presented the lowest area under the curve/ROC for penetrating and blunt TBI, and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score for extracranial injuries. CONCLUSION: The mREMS showed no prognostic capacity for patients with TBI, and it presented the worst performance in relation to the Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score to discriminate cases of in-hospital mortality when considering trauma patients with and without TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"130-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:修订后的快速急诊医学评分(mREMS)是最近发布的一项评估创伤患者严重程度的指标;然而,对其在不同类型创伤患者中的表现知之甚少。本研究验证了mREMS对伴有和不伴有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的钝性和穿透性创伤患者住院死亡率的预测能力,并将该指标与快速急诊医学评分、损伤严重程度评分、新发损伤严重程度评分、创伤和损伤严重程度评分进行了比较。方法:这是一项回顾性的相关研究,分析了在巴西里约热内卢一家医院就诊的18岁或以上的创伤患者。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行分析。结果:987例患者中359例(36.4%)为TBI,其中225例为钝性创伤,134例为穿透性创伤。在mREMS方面,TBI患者住院死亡率的ROC曲线下面积,穿透性损伤为0.506(95%可信区间[CI], 0.404-0.609),钝性损伤为0.486 (95% CI, 0.402-0.571);无TBI患者的值分别为0.629 (95% CI, 0.554-0.703)和0.618 (95% CI, 0.552-0.684)。与其他指标相比,穿透性和钝性脑损伤的mREMS曲线/ROC下面积最低,颅外损伤的快速急救医学评分最低。结论:mREMS对TBI患者无预后预测能力,在考虑合并和不合并TBI的创伤患者时,与损伤严重程度评分、新发损伤严重程度评分和创伤及损伤严重程度评分相比,在区分住院死亡率方面表现最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of the Modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score in Patients With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS) is a recently published index to estimate the severity of trauma patients; however, little is known about its performance in patients with different types of trauma. This study verified the predictive capacity of mREMS in-hospital mortality in patients of blunt and penetrating trauma with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the performance of this index compared with the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score. METHODS: This is a retrospective, correlational study that analyzed trauma patients 18 years or older, who attended at a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied in the analyses. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 987 patients, 359 (36.4%) with TBI (225 blunt and 134 penetrating trauma). Regarding mREMS, the area under the ROC curve for TBI patients for in-hospital mortality was 0.506 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.404-0.609) for penetrating injuries and 0.486 (95% CI, 0.402-0.571) for blunt injuries; the values in patients without TBI were 0.629 (95% CI, 0.554-0.703) and 0.618 (95% CI, 0.552-0.684), respectively. In relation to the other indices the mREMS presented the lowest area under the curve/ROC for penetrating and blunt TBI, and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score for extracranial injuries. CONCLUSION: The mREMS showed no prognostic capacity for patients with TBI, and it presented the worst performance in relation to the Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score to discriminate cases of in-hospital mortality when considering trauma patients with and without TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
期刊最新文献
Resilience of Patients With Brain Tumor While Awaiting Surgery Fever, Hyperglycemia, and Swallowing Management in Stroke Unit and Non–Stroke-Unit European Hospitals: A Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) Europe Substudy Peer Review Should Be a Partnership to Help the Author Get Published Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients. Illness Uncertainty of the Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Coil Embolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1