气管插管患者鼻胃管置入三种不同体位的比较标准嗅探体位,颈部额外弯曲,标准嗅探体位,颈部侧压。

Shyam Mohanan, Madhu Gupta, Manisha Dabas
{"title":"气管插管患者鼻胃管置入三种不同体位的比较标准嗅探体位,颈部额外弯曲,标准嗅探体位,颈部侧压。","authors":"Shyam Mohanan,&nbsp;Madhu Gupta,&nbsp;Manisha Dabas","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2023.221133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate two modified nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion techniques in intubated patients compared to the conventional method in respect of first attempt success rate, time taken for insertion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective interventional study, patients with orotracheal intubation requiring NGT insertion were randomly allocated into three groups by SNOS Group A (control group- standard sniffing position, n = 40), Group B (additional flexion of the neck, n = 40), Group C (standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure, n = 40). The number of attempts for successful NGT insertion, time for insertion, and complications were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modified positions showed a high first-attempt success rate in Group B (55%) and Group C (85%) as compared to conventional Group A (32.50%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). On intergroup analysis of modified groups (B and C), Group C was superior to Group B in 1<sup>st</sup> attempt success rate with a significant <i>P</i> value of 0.003.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In intubated patients, NGT insertion in standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure has the highest first attempt success rate followed by additional flexion of neck position. Both the modified positions are better positions for NGT insertion in intubated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"51 4","pages":"318-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Intubated Patients: Comparison of Three Different Positions; Standard Sniffing Position, Additional Flexion of the Neck, and Standard Sniffing Position with Lateral Neck Pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Shyam Mohanan,&nbsp;Madhu Gupta,&nbsp;Manisha Dabas\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2023.221133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate two modified nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion techniques in intubated patients compared to the conventional method in respect of first attempt success rate, time taken for insertion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective interventional study, patients with orotracheal intubation requiring NGT insertion were randomly allocated into three groups by SNOS Group A (control group- standard sniffing position, n = 40), Group B (additional flexion of the neck, n = 40), Group C (standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure, n = 40). The number of attempts for successful NGT insertion, time for insertion, and complications were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modified positions showed a high first-attempt success rate in Group B (55%) and Group C (85%) as compared to conventional Group A (32.50%) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). On intergroup analysis of modified groups (B and C), Group C was superior to Group B in 1<sup>st</sup> attempt success rate with a significant <i>P</i> value of 0.003.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In intubated patients, NGT insertion in standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure has the highest first attempt success rate followed by additional flexion of neck position. Both the modified positions are better positions for NGT insertion in intubated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"318-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.221133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.221133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究旨在评估两种改良的鼻胃管(NGT)插入技术在首次尝试成功率、插入时间和并发症方面与传统方法的比较。方法:在本前瞻性介入研究中,将需要插入NGT的经气管插管患者随机分为三组:SNOS A组(对照组-标准嗅探体位,n = 40)、B组(额外颈部屈曲,n = 40)、C组(标准嗅探体位,颈侧压,n = 40)。比较NGT置入成功次数、置入时间及并发症。结果:B组改良体位的首次尝试成功率(55%)和C组改良体位的首次尝试成功率(85%)均高于常规a组(32.50%)(P < 0.001)。改良组(B组和C组)组间分析,C组第一次尝试成功率优于B组,P值为0.003。结论:在气管插管患者中,颈侧压标准嗅位插入NGT的第一次尝试成功率最高,随后再屈伸颈位。这两种改良体位都是插管患者更好的NGT插入体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Intubated Patients: Comparison of Three Different Positions; Standard Sniffing Position, Additional Flexion of the Neck, and Standard Sniffing Position with Lateral Neck Pressure.

Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate two modified nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion techniques in intubated patients compared to the conventional method in respect of first attempt success rate, time taken for insertion, and complications.

Methods: In this prospective interventional study, patients with orotracheal intubation requiring NGT insertion were randomly allocated into three groups by SNOS Group A (control group- standard sniffing position, n = 40), Group B (additional flexion of the neck, n = 40), Group C (standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure, n = 40). The number of attempts for successful NGT insertion, time for insertion, and complications were compared.

Results: Modified positions showed a high first-attempt success rate in Group B (55%) and Group C (85%) as compared to conventional Group A (32.50%) (P < 0.001). On intergroup analysis of modified groups (B and C), Group C was superior to Group B in 1st attempt success rate with a significant P value of 0.003.

Conclusion: In intubated patients, NGT insertion in standard sniffing position with lateral neck pressure has the highest first attempt success rate followed by additional flexion of neck position. Both the modified positions are better positions for NGT insertion in intubated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Anaesthesia Management of A Patient with Airway Obstruction Caused by Prosthetic Vascular Graft Invasion into the Tracheal Lumen. Bispectral Index Guidance Reduced Target Plasma Propofol Concentration During ERCP in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl in Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring Using A Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Regimen in Spine Surgeries. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1