面部皮肤分析新设备的初步验证。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2127305
Madison K Cook, Margaret A Kaszycki, Irma Richardson, Sarah L Taylor, Steven R Feldman
{"title":"面部皮肤分析新设备的初步验证。","authors":"Madison K Cook,&nbsp;Margaret A Kaszycki,&nbsp;Irma Richardson,&nbsp;Sarah L Taylor,&nbsp;Steven R Feldman","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2127305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of dermatology is met with many subjective analysis methods. Due to the relative nature of subjective analysis methods, objective analysis methods with greater accuracy and reliability were developed. Many of these devices are either inaccessible to patients without being a part of a clinical trial, bulky, or costly. However, with the advances in artificial intelligence and handheld devices, measurement methods have become simplified. The purpose of our study was to validate an objective skin analysis software available on a handheld device by comparing it to a board-certified dermatologist's assessment. Participants of various ages and skin types were analyzed with the facial analysis system on an iPad Pro. The same photographs were ranked by a physician based on 14 common skin characteristics. The facial analysis system and the physician's rankings had a good agreement rate of 69%. The greatest agreement rates were with the assessment of erythema (83.7%) and wrinkles (81.6%) and the lowest with oiliness (53.1%). The analysis system's high re-test reliability and good agreement rates with physician assessment support its potential use in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":"33 8","pages":"3150-3153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial validation of a new device for facial skin analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Madison K Cook,&nbsp;Margaret A Kaszycki,&nbsp;Irma Richardson,&nbsp;Sarah L Taylor,&nbsp;Steven R Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2022.2127305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The field of dermatology is met with many subjective analysis methods. Due to the relative nature of subjective analysis methods, objective analysis methods with greater accuracy and reliability were developed. Many of these devices are either inaccessible to patients without being a part of a clinical trial, bulky, or costly. However, with the advances in artificial intelligence and handheld devices, measurement methods have become simplified. The purpose of our study was to validate an objective skin analysis software available on a handheld device by comparing it to a board-certified dermatologist's assessment. Participants of various ages and skin types were analyzed with the facial analysis system on an iPad Pro. The same photographs were ranked by a physician based on 14 common skin characteristics. The facial analysis system and the physician's rankings had a good agreement rate of 69%. The greatest agreement rates were with the assessment of erythema (83.7%) and wrinkles (81.6%) and the lowest with oiliness (53.1%). The analysis system's high re-test reliability and good agreement rates with physician assessment support its potential use in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":\"33 8\",\"pages\":\"3150-3153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2127305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2127305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

皮肤病学领域有许多主观分析方法。由于主观分析方法的相对性质,人们开发了准确性和可靠性更高的客观分析方法。许多这样的设备要么是患者在没有临床试验的情况下无法使用,要么体积庞大,要么价格昂贵。然而,随着人工智能和手持设备的进步,测量方法变得简化了。我们研究的目的是通过将其与委员会认证的皮肤科医生的评估进行比较,验证手持设备上可用的客观皮肤分析软件。使用iPad Pro上的面部分析系统对不同年龄和皮肤类型的参与者进行分析。医生根据14种常见的皮肤特征对这些照片进行排名。面部分析系统与医生排名的符合率为69%。一致性最高的是红斑(83.7%)和皱纹(81.6%),最低的是油腻(53.1%)。该分析系统的高重测可靠性和与医生评估的良好一致性支持其在临床环境中的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Initial validation of a new device for facial skin analysis.

The field of dermatology is met with many subjective analysis methods. Due to the relative nature of subjective analysis methods, objective analysis methods with greater accuracy and reliability were developed. Many of these devices are either inaccessible to patients without being a part of a clinical trial, bulky, or costly. However, with the advances in artificial intelligence and handheld devices, measurement methods have become simplified. The purpose of our study was to validate an objective skin analysis software available on a handheld device by comparing it to a board-certified dermatologist's assessment. Participants of various ages and skin types were analyzed with the facial analysis system on an iPad Pro. The same photographs were ranked by a physician based on 14 common skin characteristics. The facial analysis system and the physician's rankings had a good agreement rate of 69%. The greatest agreement rates were with the assessment of erythema (83.7%) and wrinkles (81.6%) and the lowest with oiliness (53.1%). The analysis system's high re-test reliability and good agreement rates with physician assessment support its potential use in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
期刊最新文献
Boxed warnings for dermatologic JAK inhibitors: are they standardized worldwide? A review of biosimilars in psoriasis: impacts on efficacy, safety, access, and a first-hand look at biosimilar cost savings within the department of veterans affairs Postoperative risk assessment of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and the efficacy of delayed prevention following 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized controlled study. Biodegradable polymers and platelet-rich plasma causing visual impairment: a literature review. Exploring the effect of deucravacitinib in patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1