围生期应用修改后的COVID-19恐惧量表的验证

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210
Alejandro Irvin Soto Briseño, Rita A Gomez-Diaz, Ricardo Cesar Saldaña Espinoza, Pilar Lavielle, Adriana Leticia Valdez González, Niels H Wacher
{"title":"围生期应用修改后的COVID-19恐惧量表的验证","authors":"Alejandro Irvin Soto Briseño,&nbsp;Rita A Gomez-Diaz,&nbsp;Ricardo Cesar Saldaña Espinoza,&nbsp;Pilar Lavielle,&nbsp;Adriana Leticia Valdez González,&nbsp;Niels H Wacher","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 Fear Scale (FCV-19S) allows screening in general population; however, there is no specific instrument in our population for screening in the perinatal period that considers fear related with COVID-19 and offspring well-being. We aimed to validate the FCV-19S modified for application during the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Analytical, cross-sectional design. After signing consent, women 18-45 years were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha, external validity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), factorial analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient for re-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 178 women, mean age 31.04 ± 5.9. We obtained internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899). Spearman's Rho coefficient was 0.207 (<i>p</i>= .013). All the elements were statistically significant for the polychoric correlation (<i>p</i><.001). Reliability test-retest with intraclass correlation was 0.873.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The version of FCV-19S modified with eight items is a valid measurement instrument for application during the perinatal period, showing adequate internal consistency and external validity with HADS as measure of concurrence to identify anxiety related with COVID-19 during the perinatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 4","pages":"447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the COVID-19 Fear Scale modified for application during the perinatal period.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Irvin Soto Briseño,&nbsp;Rita A Gomez-Diaz,&nbsp;Ricardo Cesar Saldaña Espinoza,&nbsp;Pilar Lavielle,&nbsp;Adriana Leticia Valdez González,&nbsp;Niels H Wacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 Fear Scale (FCV-19S) allows screening in general population; however, there is no specific instrument in our population for screening in the perinatal period that considers fear related with COVID-19 and offspring well-being. We aimed to validate the FCV-19S modified for application during the perinatal period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Analytical, cross-sectional design. After signing consent, women 18-45 years were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha, external validity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), factorial analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient for re-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 178 women, mean age 31.04 ± 5.9. We obtained internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899). Spearman's Rho coefficient was 0.207 (<i>p</i>= .013). All the elements were statistically significant for the polychoric correlation (<i>p</i><.001). Reliability test-retest with intraclass correlation was 0.873.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The version of FCV-19S modified with eight items is a valid measurement instrument for application during the perinatal period, showing adequate internal consistency and external validity with HADS as measure of concurrence to identify anxiety related with COVID-19 during the perinatal period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"447-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2050210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:COVID-19恐惧量表(FCV-19S)允许在普通人群中进行筛查;然而,在我们的人群中,没有特定的工具用于围产期筛查,考虑到与COVID-19和后代福祉相关的恐惧。我们的目的是验证改良后的FCV-19S在围产期的应用。材料和方法:分析,横断面设计。在签署同意书后,18-45岁的女性被纳入研究范围。内部一致性采用Cronbach's alpha计算,外部效度采用医院焦虑与抑郁量表(HADS),因子分析和类内相关系数进行重测。结果:女性178例,平均年龄31.04±5.9岁。Cronbach’s alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899),获得内部一致性。Spearman’s Rho系数为0.207 (p= 0.013)。结论:经8项修改的FCV-19S版本是围产期应用的有效测量工具,与HADS作为识别围产期新冠肺炎相关焦虑的一致性测量指标具有足够的内部一致性和外部效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the COVID-19 Fear Scale modified for application during the perinatal period.

Purpose: The COVID-19 Fear Scale (FCV-19S) allows screening in general population; however, there is no specific instrument in our population for screening in the perinatal period that considers fear related with COVID-19 and offspring well-being. We aimed to validate the FCV-19S modified for application during the perinatal period.

Materials and methods: Analytical, cross-sectional design. After signing consent, women 18-45 years were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's alpha, external validity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), factorial analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient for re-test.

Results: The sample included 178 women, mean age 31.04 ± 5.9. We obtained internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.842-0.899). Spearman's Rho coefficient was 0.207 (p= .013). All the elements were statistically significant for the polychoric correlation (p<.001). Reliability test-retest with intraclass correlation was 0.873.

Conclusions: The version of FCV-19S modified with eight items is a valid measurement instrument for application during the perinatal period, showing adequate internal consistency and external validity with HADS as measure of concurrence to identify anxiety related with COVID-19 during the perinatal period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1