成人1型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测(CGM)满意度及其对心理健康和血糖控制的影响

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology international Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1556/2060.2022.00125
Andrea Lukács, Laura Brigitta Szerencsi, László Barkai
{"title":"成人1型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测(CGM)满意度及其对心理健康和血糖控制的影响","authors":"Andrea Lukács,&nbsp;Laura Brigitta Szerencsi,&nbsp;László Barkai","doi":"10.1556/2060.2022.00125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>A continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) helps the user stay continuously informed about blood glucose levels and reach the right target range. This study aimed to compare glycemic control and mental health of adults with type 1 diabetes with or without CGM and to examine their experiences using it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were included in the survey, whether or not they had used a CGM. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess mental health, problems with disease management, hypoglycemia attitudes and behavior, as well as glucose monitoring satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>277 people participated in the study. CGM users (61.3%) had a more favorable glycemic control than those who were not. No differences were observed between the 2 groups in mental health and in response to hypoglycemic events; however, users reported more disease-related problems. CGM users reported they felt more open and free about diabetes, however, the pain and skin irritation caused by the device was disturbing and it was difficult to cope emotionally with the constant thought and worrying about diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM did not show clear satisfaction among users, however, less fear of hypoglycemia, fewer depression symptomology and improved glycemic control indicate better clinical status, which is one of the most important goals of disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":"109 4","pages":"501-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) satisfaction and its effect on mental health and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lukács,&nbsp;Laura Brigitta Szerencsi,&nbsp;László Barkai\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/2060.2022.00125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>A continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) helps the user stay continuously informed about blood glucose levels and reach the right target range. This study aimed to compare glycemic control and mental health of adults with type 1 diabetes with or without CGM and to examine their experiences using it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were included in the survey, whether or not they had used a CGM. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess mental health, problems with disease management, hypoglycemia attitudes and behavior, as well as glucose monitoring satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>277 people participated in the study. CGM users (61.3%) had a more favorable glycemic control than those who were not. No differences were observed between the 2 groups in mental health and in response to hypoglycemic events; however, users reported more disease-related problems. CGM users reported they felt more open and free about diabetes, however, the pain and skin irritation caused by the device was disturbing and it was difficult to cope emotionally with the constant thought and worrying about diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGM did not show clear satisfaction among users, however, less fear of hypoglycemia, fewer depression symptomology and improved glycemic control indicate better clinical status, which is one of the most important goals of disease management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology international\",\"volume\":\"109 4\",\"pages\":\"501-510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2022.00125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2022.00125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景和目的:连续血糖监测(CGM)可以帮助用户持续了解血糖水平并达到正确的目标范围。本研究旨在比较有或没有CGM的成人1型糖尿病患者的血糖控制和心理健康,并检查他们使用CGM的经历。方法:将患者纳入调查,无论他们是否使用过CGM。采用标准化问卷来评估心理健康、疾病管理问题、低血糖态度和行为以及血糖监测满意度。结果:277人参与了研究。CGM服用者(61.3%)的血糖控制比不服用者更好。两组在心理健康和对低血糖事件的反应方面无差异;然而,用户报告了更多与疾病相关的问题。CGM使用者报告说,他们对糖尿病感到更加开放和自由,然而,该设备引起的疼痛和皮肤刺激令人不安,并且难以在情感上应对持续的思考和对糖尿病的担忧。结论:CGM使用者满意度不明显,但对低血糖的恐惧减少,抑郁症状减少,血糖控制改善,表明临床状况较好,是疾病管理的重要目标之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) satisfaction and its effect on mental health and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Background and aim: A continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) helps the user stay continuously informed about blood glucose levels and reach the right target range. This study aimed to compare glycemic control and mental health of adults with type 1 diabetes with or without CGM and to examine their experiences using it.

Methods: Patients were included in the survey, whether or not they had used a CGM. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess mental health, problems with disease management, hypoglycemia attitudes and behavior, as well as glucose monitoring satisfaction.

Results: 277 people participated in the study. CGM users (61.3%) had a more favorable glycemic control than those who were not. No differences were observed between the 2 groups in mental health and in response to hypoglycemic events; however, users reported more disease-related problems. CGM users reported they felt more open and free about diabetes, however, the pain and skin irritation caused by the device was disturbing and it was difficult to cope emotionally with the constant thought and worrying about diabetes.

Conclusions: CGM did not show clear satisfaction among users, however, less fear of hypoglycemia, fewer depression symptomology and improved glycemic control indicate better clinical status, which is one of the most important goals of disease management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of results of radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Respiratory system mechanics during noninvasive proportional assist ventilation: A model study. Aerobic capacity of healthy young men associated with muscle oxygen extraction rate of the vastus lateralis muscle. Effects of aerobic exercise at different intensities on articular cartilage in mice. Physiological characterization of a simulated kettlebell routine in experienced kettlebell athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1