根据戒烟援助的类型估计未能报告不成功的戒烟尝试:英国吸烟者的人口调查。

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5572480
Olga Perski, Robert West, Jamie Brown
{"title":"根据戒烟援助的类型估计未能报告不成功的戒烟尝试:英国吸烟者的人口调查。","authors":"Olga Perski,&nbsp;Robert West,&nbsp;Jamie Brown","doi":"10.1155/2022/5572480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It has been estimated that smokers tend to fail to report unsuccessful quit attempts that lasted a short time and occurred a longer time ago. However, it is unclear whether the failure to report unsuccessful quit attempts varies by the type of cessation aid used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5,892 smokers aged 16+ years who had made 1+ quit attempts in the past year were surveyed between January 2014 and December 2020 as part of the Smoking Toolkit Study. Respondents indicated when their most recent quit attempt started, how long it lasted, and which cessation aid(s) were used (e.g., unaided, varenicline, and behavioural support). The percentage failure to report for each cessation aid and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with an established method. Test for equality of proportions was performed to examine whether quit attempts lasting between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago failed to be reported at a different rate depending on the cessation aid used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated that after three months, 97% (95% CI = 96%-98%) of unaided quit attempts lasting less than one day, 80% (95% CI = 79%-81%) of those lasting between one day and one week, and 60% (95% CI = 59%-61%) of those lasting between one week and one month fail to be reported. Compared with unaided attempts, the estimated percentage failure to report quit attempts that lasted between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago was significantly lower for attempts involving behavioural support (92% of unaided attempts vs. 75% of attempts involving behavioural support, <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>(1) = 9.29, <i>p</i> = 0.002). No other significant differences were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smokers in England appear to fail to report a substantial proportion of unsuccessful quit attempts. This failure appears particularly prominent for attempts that last a short time or occurred longer ago and appears lower for attempts involving behavioural support compared with unaided attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"2022 ","pages":"5572480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762728/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated Failure to Report Unsuccessful Quit Attempts by Type of Cessation Aid: A Population Survey of Smokers in England.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Perski,&nbsp;Robert West,&nbsp;Jamie Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/5572480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It has been estimated that smokers tend to fail to report unsuccessful quit attempts that lasted a short time and occurred a longer time ago. However, it is unclear whether the failure to report unsuccessful quit attempts varies by the type of cessation aid used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5,892 smokers aged 16+ years who had made 1+ quit attempts in the past year were surveyed between January 2014 and December 2020 as part of the Smoking Toolkit Study. Respondents indicated when their most recent quit attempt started, how long it lasted, and which cessation aid(s) were used (e.g., unaided, varenicline, and behavioural support). The percentage failure to report for each cessation aid and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with an established method. Test for equality of proportions was performed to examine whether quit attempts lasting between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago failed to be reported at a different rate depending on the cessation aid used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated that after three months, 97% (95% CI = 96%-98%) of unaided quit attempts lasting less than one day, 80% (95% CI = 79%-81%) of those lasting between one day and one week, and 60% (95% CI = 59%-61%) of those lasting between one week and one month fail to be reported. Compared with unaided attempts, the estimated percentage failure to report quit attempts that lasted between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago was significantly lower for attempts involving behavioural support (92% of unaided attempts vs. 75% of attempts involving behavioural support, <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>(1) = 9.29, <i>p</i> = 0.002). No other significant differences were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smokers in England appear to fail to report a substantial proportion of unsuccessful quit attempts. This failure appears particularly prominent for attempts that last a short time or occurred longer ago and appears lower for attempts involving behavioural support compared with unaided attempts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"5572480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5572480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5572480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:据估计,吸烟者倾向于不报告持续时间较短且发生在较长时间以前的不成功戒烟尝试。然而,目前尚不清楚是否不报告不成功的戒烟尝试因所使用的戒烟援助类型而异。方法:2014年1月至2020年12月,作为吸烟工具包研究的一部分,共有5892名16岁以上的吸烟者在过去一年中进行了1次以上的戒烟尝试。答复者指出他们最近一次戒烟尝试是何时开始的,持续了多长时间,以及使用了哪些戒烟辅助工具(例如,无辅助、伐尼克兰和行为支持)。每个戒烟援助报告失败的百分比和95%的自举置信区间(ci)用既定的方法估计。进行了比例相等检验,以检查持续1天至1周的戒烟尝试和6个月以上开始的戒烟尝试是否未能以不同的比率报告,这取决于所使用的戒烟援助。结果:我们估计三个月后,97% (95% CI = 96%-98%)持续不到一天的独立戒烟尝试,80% (95% CI = 79%-81%)持续一天到一周的戒烟尝试,60% (95% CI = 59%-61%)持续一周到一个月的戒烟尝试没有报告。与独立尝试相比,涉及行为支持的尝试中,持续1天至1周且开始时间>6个月的戒烟尝试失败的估计百分比显着降低(92%的独立尝试vs 75%的涉及行为支持的尝试,χ 2(1) = 9.29, p = 0.002)。未发现其他显著差异。结论:英国的吸烟者似乎没有报告大量不成功的戒烟尝试。这种失败在持续时间较短或发生时间较长的尝试中表现得尤为突出,在有行为支持的尝试中表现得比没有帮助的尝试更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimated Failure to Report Unsuccessful Quit Attempts by Type of Cessation Aid: A Population Survey of Smokers in England.

Introduction: It has been estimated that smokers tend to fail to report unsuccessful quit attempts that lasted a short time and occurred a longer time ago. However, it is unclear whether the failure to report unsuccessful quit attempts varies by the type of cessation aid used.

Methods: A total of 5,892 smokers aged 16+ years who had made 1+ quit attempts in the past year were surveyed between January 2014 and December 2020 as part of the Smoking Toolkit Study. Respondents indicated when their most recent quit attempt started, how long it lasted, and which cessation aid(s) were used (e.g., unaided, varenicline, and behavioural support). The percentage failure to report for each cessation aid and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with an established method. Test for equality of proportions was performed to examine whether quit attempts lasting between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago failed to be reported at a different rate depending on the cessation aid used.

Results: We estimated that after three months, 97% (95% CI = 96%-98%) of unaided quit attempts lasting less than one day, 80% (95% CI = 79%-81%) of those lasting between one day and one week, and 60% (95% CI = 59%-61%) of those lasting between one week and one month fail to be reported. Compared with unaided attempts, the estimated percentage failure to report quit attempts that lasted between one day and one week and that started >6 months ago was significantly lower for attempts involving behavioural support (92% of unaided attempts vs. 75% of attempts involving behavioural support, χ 2(1) = 9.29, p = 0.002). No other significant differences were detected.

Conclusions: Smokers in England appear to fail to report a substantial proportion of unsuccessful quit attempts. This failure appears particularly prominent for attempts that last a short time or occurred longer ago and appears lower for attempts involving behavioural support compared with unaided attempts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1