针对有自杀倾向者的远程混合治疗:单臂概念验证试验

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2905
Rebekka Büscher, Tobias Teismann, Paula Hartleitner, Jan Philipp Klein, Harald Baumeister, Lasse B. Sander
{"title":"针对有自杀倾向者的远程混合治疗:单臂概念验证试验","authors":"Rebekka Büscher,&nbsp;Tobias Teismann,&nbsp;Paula Hartleitner,&nbsp;Jan Philipp Klein,&nbsp;Harald Baumeister,&nbsp;Lasse B. Sander","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>New digital treatment formats may reduce barriers to treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a remote blended care programme for this population, defined as acceptability, demand, practicality, adaptation, indications of efficacy and safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a mixed-methods single-arm trial for proof-of-concept. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, had sufficient German proficiency, a Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation score ≥2, internet access and lived near the outpatient clinic. The treatment consisted of 12 sessions of cognitive-behavioural videotherapy combined with online modules over 6 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 10 participants. All patients were satisfied with the treatment; most patients (80%) reported unpleasant memories resurfacing. All patients completed all therapy sessions and a mean of 13.7 modules (SD = 5.7); three patients switched to face-to-face treatment, in one case due to safety concerns. All patients and most therapists (83.3%) found the treatment overall practicable. Most patients (66.7%) and therapists (66.7%) considered remote treatment equivalent to face-to-face therapy. There were no serious adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While promising, the results suggest changes to the programme might be needed, particularly for patients' safety. A controlled feasibility trial should investigate temporary deteriorations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote blended treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation: A single-arm proof-of-concept trial\",\"authors\":\"Rebekka Büscher,&nbsp;Tobias Teismann,&nbsp;Paula Hartleitner,&nbsp;Jan Philipp Klein,&nbsp;Harald Baumeister,&nbsp;Lasse B. Sander\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.2905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>New digital treatment formats may reduce barriers to treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a remote blended care programme for this population, defined as acceptability, demand, practicality, adaptation, indications of efficacy and safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a mixed-methods single-arm trial for proof-of-concept. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, had sufficient German proficiency, a Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation score ≥2, internet access and lived near the outpatient clinic. The treatment consisted of 12 sessions of cognitive-behavioural videotherapy combined with online modules over 6 weeks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 10 participants. All patients were satisfied with the treatment; most patients (80%) reported unpleasant memories resurfacing. All patients completed all therapy sessions and a mean of 13.7 modules (SD = 5.7); three patients switched to face-to-face treatment, in one case due to safety concerns. All patients and most therapists (83.3%) found the treatment overall practicable. Most patients (66.7%) and therapists (66.7%) considered remote treatment equivalent to face-to-face therapy. There were no serious adverse events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While promising, the results suggest changes to the programme might be needed, particularly for patients' safety. A controlled feasibility trial should investigate temporary deteriorations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2905\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2905\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:新的数字化治疗模式可以减少有自杀倾向者接受治疗的障碍。本研究旨在调查针对这一人群的远程混合治疗方案的可行性,包括可接受性、需求、实用性、适应性、疗效和安全性指标。 方法 我们进行了一项混合方法单臂试验,以验证概念。参与者需年满 18 周岁、德语水平良好、贝克自杀意念量表评分≥2 分、能上网且住在门诊附近。治疗包括 12 个疗程的认知行为视频疗法和在线模块,为期 6 周。 结果 我们纳入了 10 名参与者。所有患者都对治疗感到满意;大多数患者(80%)表示不愉快的记忆再次浮现。所有患者都完成了所有治疗疗程和平均 13.7 个模块(SD = 5.7);有三名患者转为面对面治疗,其中一名患者是出于安全考虑。所有患者和大多数治疗师(83.3%)都认为治疗总体上切实可行。大多数患者(66.7%)和治疗师(66.7%)认为远程治疗等同于面对面治疗。没有出现严重的不良事件。 结论 虽然前景看好,但结果表明可能需要对该计划进行修改,特别是为了患者的安全。应开展一项受控可行性试验,对暂时性的病情恶化进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote blended treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation: A single-arm proof-of-concept trial

Introduction

New digital treatment formats may reduce barriers to treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a remote blended care programme for this population, defined as acceptability, demand, practicality, adaptation, indications of efficacy and safety.

Methods

We conducted a mixed-methods single-arm trial for proof-of-concept. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, had sufficient German proficiency, a Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation score ≥2, internet access and lived near the outpatient clinic. The treatment consisted of 12 sessions of cognitive-behavioural videotherapy combined with online modules over 6 weeks.

Results

We included 10 participants. All patients were satisfied with the treatment; most patients (80%) reported unpleasant memories resurfacing. All patients completed all therapy sessions and a mean of 13.7 modules (SD = 5.7); three patients switched to face-to-face treatment, in one case due to safety concerns. All patients and most therapists (83.3%) found the treatment overall practicable. Most patients (66.7%) and therapists (66.7%) considered remote treatment equivalent to face-to-face therapy. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusion

While promising, the results suggest changes to the programme might be needed, particularly for patients' safety. A controlled feasibility trial should investigate temporary deteriorations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1