全国上颈椎捏脊协会的检查人员之间的一致意见:三视图上颈椎x线片系列中寰椎半脱位复合体的分析

Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP , D. Gordon Hasick DC , Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD , John F. Hart DC, MHSc , Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC , Craig P. Lapenski DC
{"title":"全国上颈椎捏脊协会的检查人员之间的一致意见:三视图上颈椎x线片系列中寰椎半脱位复合体的分析","authors":"Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP ,&nbsp;D. Gordon Hasick DC ,&nbsp;Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John F. Hart DC, MHSc ,&nbsp;Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC ,&nbsp;Craig P. Lapenski DC","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, <em>P</em> = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, <em>P</em> = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-Examiner Agreement of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association Analysis of the Atlas Subluxation Complex in a 3-View Upper Cervical Radiographic Series\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP ,&nbsp;D. Gordon Hasick DC ,&nbsp;Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John F. Hart DC, MHSc ,&nbsp;Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC ,&nbsp;Craig P. Lapenski DC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, <em>P</em> = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, <em>P</em> = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是测量2名全国上颈按摩协会认证的按摩师的x线片标记之间的一致性。方法2名接受过标准化训练的捏脊检查员对254组常规正交x线片进行评分分析。使用绝对一致性的类内相关系数和Bland-Altman图分析来评估其测量中的一致性水平和潜在偏差。结果检查者对寰椎侧边测量的一致性为96.1%,对寰椎旋转测量的一致性为94.5%。寰椎侧侧的类内相关系数为0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96),寰椎旋转的类内相关系数为0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94)。两名检查者测量结果的平均差异为- 0.11,寰椎侧侧P = 0.12,寰椎旋转P = 0.05, P = 0.55。寰椎横向和寰椎旋转测量值均与零无显著差异。Bland-Altman图在两次测量中没有提示任何比例偏差。结论两名训练有素的捏脊检查人员的研究结果几乎完全一致,在传统的正交x线片组分析中没有明显的比例偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-Examiner Agreement of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association Analysis of the Atlas Subluxation Complex in a 3-View Upper Cervical Radiographic Series

Objective

The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.

Methods

Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.

Results

There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, P = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, P = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.

Conclusion

Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1