在新冠肺炎大流行期间促进社会复原力:对公共卫生战略的多国分析。

Anna Carole D'Amelio, Sarah Cataldi, Giulia Dallagiacoma, Leandro Gentile, Anna Odone, Carlo Signorelli
{"title":"在新冠肺炎大流行期间促进社会复原力:对公共卫生战略的多国分析。","authors":"Anna Carole D'Amelio,&nbsp;Sarah Cataldi,&nbsp;Giulia Dallagiacoma,&nbsp;Leandro Gentile,&nbsp;Anna Odone,&nbsp;Carlo Signorelli","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Enhancing public health communication during a global crisis is crucial to promote resilience. This study examines the influence of health communication in ten countries, analysing its positive and negative impact on society's behavior regarding the origin, symptoms, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive narrative analysis of available data was conducted to evaluate societal and resilience responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consulted academic and grey literature, from February 1, 2020, to March 1, 2022, focusing on ten countries that exhibited heterogenous responses to pandemic, including EU (Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Romania, France, and Germany) and non-EU (United Kingdom and Israel) countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stringency of policy responses varied between countries and over time, with some countries implementing strict lockdowns while others only issued recommendations. Vaccination campaign and the spread of less virulent variants of the virus has led most countries to lift most restrictions by April 2022. However, vaccine uptake and refusal remain complex issues influenced by social norms, cultural beliefs, access to information, and trust in government authorities. Social media played a significant role during the pandemic, but healthcare professionals' active participation in addressing misinformation was lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of Public Health in developing proper strategies and utilizing digitals tools to counteract infodemic and spread relevant information. Healthcare workers should improve their communication skills to face future epidemics and be trusted by the population. Social media and digital platforms should be studied and used effectively in times of emergency.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting societal resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country analysis of public health strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Carole D'Amelio,&nbsp;Sarah Cataldi,&nbsp;Giulia Dallagiacoma,&nbsp;Leandro Gentile,&nbsp;Anna Odone,&nbsp;Carlo Signorelli\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Enhancing public health communication during a global crisis is crucial to promote resilience. This study examines the influence of health communication in ten countries, analysing its positive and negative impact on society's behavior regarding the origin, symptoms, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive narrative analysis of available data was conducted to evaluate societal and resilience responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consulted academic and grey literature, from February 1, 2020, to March 1, 2022, focusing on ten countries that exhibited heterogenous responses to pandemic, including EU (Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Romania, France, and Germany) and non-EU (United Kingdom and Israel) countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stringency of policy responses varied between countries and over time, with some countries implementing strict lockdowns while others only issued recommendations. Vaccination campaign and the spread of less virulent variants of the virus has led most countries to lift most restrictions by April 2022. However, vaccine uptake and refusal remain complex issues influenced by social norms, cultural beliefs, access to information, and trust in government authorities. Social media played a significant role during the pandemic, but healthcare professionals' active participation in addressing misinformation was lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of Public Health in developing proper strategies and utilizing digitals tools to counteract infodemic and spread relevant information. Healthcare workers should improve their communication skills to face future epidemics and be trusted by the population. Social media and digital platforms should be studied and used effectively in times of emergency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在全球危机期间加强公共卫生沟通对于提高复原力至关重要。本研究考察了10个国家健康传播的影响,分析了其对社会行为的积极和消极影响,包括SARS-CoV-2的起源、症状和预防。方法:对现有数据进行全面叙述性分析,以评估新冠肺炎大流行期间的社会和复原力应对措施。该研究查阅了2020年2月1日至2022年3月1日期间的学术和灰色文献,重点关注对疫情表现出异质性反应的十个国家,包括欧盟(意大利、丹麦、瑞典、西班牙、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、法国和德国)和非欧盟(英国和以色列)国家。结果:随着时间的推移,各国政策应对的严格程度各不相同,一些国家实施了严格的封锁,而另一些国家只发布了建议。疫苗接种运动和毒性较小的病毒变种的传播导致大多数国家在2022年4月前取消了大部分限制。然而,疫苗的接种和拒绝仍然是受社会规范、文化信仰、信息获取和对政府当局的信任影响的复杂问题。社交媒体在疫情期间发挥了重要作用,但医疗保健专业人员在解决错误信息方面缺乏积极参与。结论:新冠肺炎大流行突出了公共卫生在制定适当战略和利用数字工具应对信息传播和传播相关信息方面的重要性。医护人员应提高沟通技能,以应对未来的流行病,并得到民众的信任。应研究社交媒体和数字平台,并在紧急情况下有效使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promoting societal resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country analysis of public health strategies.

Background and aim: Enhancing public health communication during a global crisis is crucial to promote resilience. This study examines the influence of health communication in ten countries, analysing its positive and negative impact on society's behavior regarding the origin, symptoms, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: A comprehensive narrative analysis of available data was conducted to evaluate societal and resilience responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consulted academic and grey literature, from February 1, 2020, to March 1, 2022, focusing on ten countries that exhibited heterogenous responses to pandemic, including EU (Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Romania, France, and Germany) and non-EU (United Kingdom and Israel) countries.

Results: The stringency of policy responses varied between countries and over time, with some countries implementing strict lockdowns while others only issued recommendations. Vaccination campaign and the spread of less virulent variants of the virus has led most countries to lift most restrictions by April 2022. However, vaccine uptake and refusal remain complex issues influenced by social norms, cultural beliefs, access to information, and trust in government authorities. Social media played a significant role during the pandemic, but healthcare professionals' active participation in addressing misinformation was lacking.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of Public Health in developing proper strategies and utilizing digitals tools to counteract infodemic and spread relevant information. Healthcare workers should improve their communication skills to face future epidemics and be trusted by the population. Social media and digital platforms should be studied and used effectively in times of emergency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Covid-19 emergency management and preparedness in cross-border territories. Collection of experiences, needs and public health strategies in the framework of interreg GESTI.S.CO. project. Built environment impact on people with dementia (PwD) health and well-being outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Rolling e-learning: an educational model to support Italian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluation of stakeholder opinion about Long Term Care Facilities for People with Dementia perceived quality: a web-based survey in the Italian context. HB-HTA focus in a tertiary hospitals' network in Northern Italy: A three-years experience analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1