夹层贷款债权人间协议中的结构性保护

Andrew A. Lance
{"title":"夹层贷款债权人间协议中的结构性保护","authors":"Andrew A. Lance","doi":"10.1002/bref.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reviews a number of the important structural protections found in inter-creditor agreements, discusses the negotiated modifications to those protections which are common today and assesses whether the modifications reflect market-driven erosion of the structural protections. After reviewing the differences between market placements and asset types which can justify such modifications, and the legal rationale underlying many common variations, the author concludes that the variations typically found in inter-creditor agreements are the product of legitimate negotiation and justifiable differentiation, rather than the erosion of structural protections as a by-product of a highly competitive environment. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"4 1","pages":"21-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural protections in inter-creditor agreements for mezzanine loans\",\"authors\":\"Andrew A. Lance\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bref.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper reviews a number of the important structural protections found in inter-creditor agreements, discusses the negotiated modifications to those protections which are common today and assesses whether the modifications reflect market-driven erosion of the structural protections. After reviewing the differences between market placements and asset types which can justify such modifications, and the legal rationale underlying many common variations, the author concludes that the variations typically found in inter-creditor agreements are the product of legitimate negotiation and justifiable differentiation, rather than the erosion of structural protections as a by-product of a highly competitive environment. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"21-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了债权人间协议中发现的一些重要的结构性保护,讨论了今天常见的对这些保护的谈判修改,并评估了这些修改是否反映了市场驱动的结构性保护的侵蚀。在审查了市场配售和资产类型之间的差异,这些差异可以证明这种修改是合理的,以及许多常见变化背后的法律依据之后,作者得出结论,在债权人间协议中通常发现的变化是合法谈判和合理区分的产物,而不是作为高度竞争环境的副产品的结构性保护的侵蚀。版权所有©2004 Henry Stewart Publications
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structural protections in inter-creditor agreements for mezzanine loans

This paper reviews a number of the important structural protections found in inter-creditor agreements, discusses the negotiated modifications to those protections which are common today and assesses whether the modifications reflect market-driven erosion of the structural protections. After reviewing the differences between market placements and asset types which can justify such modifications, and the legal rationale underlying many common variations, the author concludes that the variations typically found in inter-creditor agreements are the product of legitimate negotiation and justifiable differentiation, rather than the erosion of structural protections as a by-product of a highly competitive environment. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in quantifying risk in commercial real estate lending Leverage in real estate investments: an optimization approach Holding period effect and home price indexes: a dynamic analysis Top 10 securitizable loan negotiations† Real estate loan delinquency, property prices and alternative income opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1