尿道周围注射自体肌源性干细胞和成纤维细胞与尿道中悬吊手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:一项随机临床试验。

IF 1.1 Q4 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.46582/jsrm.1802008
Azar Daneshpajooh, Alireza Farsinejad, Ali Derakhshani, Mahboubeh Mirzaei, Tania Dehesh, Atefe Eslami, Hamid Pakmanesh, Samira Sohbati
{"title":"尿道周围注射自体肌源性干细胞和成纤维细胞与尿道中悬吊手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Azar Daneshpajooh,&nbsp;Alireza Farsinejad,&nbsp;Ali Derakhshani,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Mirzaei,&nbsp;Tania Dehesh,&nbsp;Atefe Eslami,&nbsp;Hamid Pakmanesh,&nbsp;Samira Sohbati","doi":"10.46582/jsrm.1802008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effect of periurethral injection of autologous muscle-derived stem cell versus mid-urethral sling surgery at a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who had not responded to conservative treatments, after registering the participants and obtaining informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups of 15 each treated with periurethral injection of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) and mid-urethral sling surgery, respectively. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UISF) and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires, clinical examination, cough test, and 1-hour pad test. The results were analyzed within the groups and then compared between the two groups. Moreover, both groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 1-year follow-up, in the stem cell group, 10 patients (66.6%) experienced improvements after the periurethral injection of stem cells; half of these patients (33.3%) reported a full recovery. In the mid-urethral sling group, 13 patients (93.3%) experienced improvement, and 12 patients (80%) reported a full recovery. The analysis of ICIQ-UISF and I-QOL questionnaires indicated that the responses in both groups were significant, but the response in the stem cell group was significantly lower compared with the standard surgery group. No considerable complications were observed in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the periurethral injection of MDSCs considerably improves the symptoms with minimum complications in women with SUI, its therapeutic response is significantly lower compared with mid-urethral sling surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837696/pdf/jsrm_18_43.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Periurethral Injection of Autologous Muscle-Derived Stem Cell and Fibroblasts with Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Azar Daneshpajooh,&nbsp;Alireza Farsinejad,&nbsp;Ali Derakhshani,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Mirzaei,&nbsp;Tania Dehesh,&nbsp;Atefe Eslami,&nbsp;Hamid Pakmanesh,&nbsp;Samira Sohbati\",\"doi\":\"10.46582/jsrm.1802008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effect of periurethral injection of autologous muscle-derived stem cell versus mid-urethral sling surgery at a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who had not responded to conservative treatments, after registering the participants and obtaining informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups of 15 each treated with periurethral injection of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) and mid-urethral sling surgery, respectively. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UISF) and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires, clinical examination, cough test, and 1-hour pad test. The results were analyzed within the groups and then compared between the two groups. Moreover, both groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 1-year follow-up, in the stem cell group, 10 patients (66.6%) experienced improvements after the periurethral injection of stem cells; half of these patients (33.3%) reported a full recovery. In the mid-urethral sling group, 13 patients (93.3%) experienced improvement, and 12 patients (80%) reported a full recovery. The analysis of ICIQ-UISF and I-QOL questionnaires indicated that the responses in both groups were significant, but the response in the stem cell group was significantly lower compared with the standard surgery group. No considerable complications were observed in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the periurethral injection of MDSCs considerably improves the symptoms with minimum complications in women with SUI, its therapeutic response is significantly lower compared with mid-urethral sling surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837696/pdf/jsrm_18_43.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46582/jsrm.1802008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46582/jsrm.1802008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们在1年的随访中分析了尿道周围注射自体肌肉源性干细胞与尿道中悬吊手术的治疗效果。方法:本随机对照临床试验对30例保守治疗无效的压力性尿失禁(SUI)女性患者进行登记并获得知情同意。患者被分为两组,每组15人,分别接受尿道周围肌源性干细胞(MDSCs)注射和尿道中悬吊手术治疗。随访于治疗后1、3、6、12个月,采用国际尿失禁咨询问卷-尿失禁短表(iciq - usf)和尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)、临床检查、咳嗽试验和1小时尿垫试验。结果在组内进行分析,然后在两组之间进行比较。此外,比较两组患者的术后并发症。结果:1年随访中,干细胞组10例(66.6%)患者经尿道周围注射干细胞后出现改善;这些患者中有一半(33.3%)报告完全康复。在中尿道吊带组中,13例(93.3%)患者改善,12例(80%)患者完全恢复。iciq - usf和I-QOL问卷分析显示,两组疗效均显著,但干细胞组疗效明显低于标准手术组。两组均未见明显并发症。结论:虽然经尿道注射MDSCs可显著改善SUI患者的症状,并发症最少,但其治疗效果明显低于经尿道中悬吊手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Periurethral Injection of Autologous Muscle-Derived Stem Cell and Fibroblasts with Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective: In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effect of periurethral injection of autologous muscle-derived stem cell versus mid-urethral sling surgery at a 1-year follow-up.

Method: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who had not responded to conservative treatments, after registering the participants and obtaining informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups of 15 each treated with periurethral injection of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) and mid-urethral sling surgery, respectively. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UISF) and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires, clinical examination, cough test, and 1-hour pad test. The results were analyzed within the groups and then compared between the two groups. Moreover, both groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications.

Results: At the 1-year follow-up, in the stem cell group, 10 patients (66.6%) experienced improvements after the periurethral injection of stem cells; half of these patients (33.3%) reported a full recovery. In the mid-urethral sling group, 13 patients (93.3%) experienced improvement, and 12 patients (80%) reported a full recovery. The analysis of ICIQ-UISF and I-QOL questionnaires indicated that the responses in both groups were significant, but the response in the stem cell group was significantly lower compared with the standard surgery group. No considerable complications were observed in the two groups.

Conclusion: Although the periurethral injection of MDSCs considerably improves the symptoms with minimum complications in women with SUI, its therapeutic response is significantly lower compared with mid-urethral sling surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells and Their Secretomes as tools of regenerative medicine; Influence of Donor Characteristics on Standardization. MSC secretome from amniotic fluid halts IL-1β and TNF-α inflammation via the ERK/MAPK pathway, promoting cartilage regeneration in OA in vitro. The Therapeutic Potential of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived Exosomes for Wound Healing: Harnessing Exosomes as a Cell-free Therapy. Cues from evolving insights about Cancer stem cells to tackle cancer metastases. I. Biomaterials for reconstruction of bone and cartilage defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1