遏制饥饿,对抗不公正?探索新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间食品银行的跨国增长——以及应对措施。

Food ethics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y
Charlotte Spring, Kayleigh Garthwaite, Andy Fisher
{"title":"遏制饥饿,对抗不公正?探索新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间食品银行的跨国增长——以及应对措施。","authors":"Charlotte Spring, Kayleigh Garthwaite, Andy Fisher","doi":"10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 caused levels of household food insecurity to spike, but the precarity of so many people in wealthy countries is an outgrowth of decades of eroding public provisions and labour protections that once protected people from hunger, setting the stage for the virus' unevenly-distributed harms. The prominence of corporate-sponsored foodbanking as a containment response to pandemic-aggravated food insecurity follows decades of replacing rights with charity. We review structural drivers of charity's growth to prominence as a hunger solution in North America, and of its spread to countries including the UK. By highlighting pre-pandemic pressures shaping foodbanking, including charities' efforts to retool themselves as health providers, we ask whether anti-hunger efforts during the pandemic serve to <i>contain</i> ongoing socioeconomic crises and the unjust living conditions they cause, or <i>contest</i> them through transformative pathways to a just food system. We suggest that pandemic-driven philanthropic and state funding flows have bolstered foodbanking and the food system logics that support it. By contextualising the complex and variegated politics of foodbanking in broader movements, from community food security to food sovereignty, we reframe simplistic narratives of charity and highlight the need for justice-oriented structural changes in wealth redistribution and food system organisation if we are to prevent the kinds of emergency-within-emergency that we witnessed as COVID-19 revealed the proximity of many to hunger.</p>","PeriodicalId":73041,"journal":{"name":"Food ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Containing Hunger, Contesting Injustice? Exploring the Transnational Growth of Foodbanking- and Counter-responses- Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Spring, Kayleigh Garthwaite, Andy Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>COVID-19 caused levels of household food insecurity to spike, but the precarity of so many people in wealthy countries is an outgrowth of decades of eroding public provisions and labour protections that once protected people from hunger, setting the stage for the virus' unevenly-distributed harms. The prominence of corporate-sponsored foodbanking as a containment response to pandemic-aggravated food insecurity follows decades of replacing rights with charity. We review structural drivers of charity's growth to prominence as a hunger solution in North America, and of its spread to countries including the UK. By highlighting pre-pandemic pressures shaping foodbanking, including charities' efforts to retool themselves as health providers, we ask whether anti-hunger efforts during the pandemic serve to <i>contain</i> ongoing socioeconomic crises and the unjust living conditions they cause, or <i>contest</i> them through transformative pathways to a just food system. We suggest that pandemic-driven philanthropic and state funding flows have bolstered foodbanking and the food system logics that support it. By contextualising the complex and variegated politics of foodbanking in broader movements, from community food security to food sovereignty, we reframe simplistic narratives of charity and highlight the need for justice-oriented structural changes in wealth redistribution and food system organisation if we are to prevent the kinds of emergency-within-emergency that we witnessed as COVID-19 revealed the proximity of many to hunger.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00099-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 导致家庭粮食不安全水平飙升,但富裕国家中如此多的人处于不稳定状态,是几十年来曾经保护人们免受饥饿的公共供应和劳动保护被侵蚀的结果,这为病毒造成的分布不均的危害埋下了伏笔。在以慈善取代权利的数十年后,企业赞助的粮食银行作为遏制大流行病加剧的粮食不安全的应对措施,其重要性日益凸显。我们回顾了慈善作为一种解决饥饿问题的方法在北美日益突出的结构性驱动因素,以及其向包括英国在内的国家蔓延的结构性驱动因素。通过强调大流行前形成食物银行的压力,包括慈善机构努力将自身调整为健康提供者,我们提出了一个问题:大流行期间的反饥饿努力是为了遏制持续的社会经济危机及其造成的不公正生活条件,还是通过通往公正食物体系的转型途径与之抗衡。我们认为,大流行病驱动的慈善事业和国家资金流支持了粮食银行和支持粮食银行的粮食系统逻辑。通过对粮食银行在从社区粮食安全到粮食主权等更广泛运动中复杂多样的政治背景进行分析,我们重新构建了简单化的慈善叙事,并强调如果我们要防止出现我们在 COVID-19 事件中目睹的那种 "紧急中的紧急"(emergency-within-emergency),就必须在财富再分配和粮食系统组织方面进行以正义为导向的结构性变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Containing Hunger, Contesting Injustice? Exploring the Transnational Growth of Foodbanking- and Counter-responses- Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

COVID-19 caused levels of household food insecurity to spike, but the precarity of so many people in wealthy countries is an outgrowth of decades of eroding public provisions and labour protections that once protected people from hunger, setting the stage for the virus' unevenly-distributed harms. The prominence of corporate-sponsored foodbanking as a containment response to pandemic-aggravated food insecurity follows decades of replacing rights with charity. We review structural drivers of charity's growth to prominence as a hunger solution in North America, and of its spread to countries including the UK. By highlighting pre-pandemic pressures shaping foodbanking, including charities' efforts to retool themselves as health providers, we ask whether anti-hunger efforts during the pandemic serve to contain ongoing socioeconomic crises and the unjust living conditions they cause, or contest them through transformative pathways to a just food system. We suggest that pandemic-driven philanthropic and state funding flows have bolstered foodbanking and the food system logics that support it. By contextualising the complex and variegated politics of foodbanking in broader movements, from community food security to food sovereignty, we reframe simplistic narratives of charity and highlight the need for justice-oriented structural changes in wealth redistribution and food system organisation if we are to prevent the kinds of emergency-within-emergency that we witnessed as COVID-19 revealed the proximity of many to hunger.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identity and Culture Based on the Traditional Cuisine of Bello city, Antioquia, Colombia “Dear Dairy, It’s Not Me, It’s You”: Australian Public Attitudes to Dairy Expressed Through Love and Breakup Letters Expert Views on Communicating Genetic Technology Used in Agriculture When Tradition Meets Innovation: A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Factors Influencing Chinese Consumers' Purchase Intentions for Meat Substitutes Are Animals Needed for Food Supply, Efficient Resource Use, and Sustainable Cropping Systems? An Argumentation Analysis Regarding Livestock Farming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1