外科医生对骨延长钉并发症的严重程度和来源达成一致吗?评分者间和评分者内的可靠性研究。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1571
Markus Winther Frost, Ole Rahbek, Marie Fridberg, Mindaugas Mikužis, Søren Kold
{"title":"外科医生对骨延长钉并发症的严重程度和来源达成一致吗?评分者间和评分者内的可靠性研究。","authors":"Markus Winther Frost,&nbsp;Ole Rahbek,&nbsp;Marie Fridberg,&nbsp;Mindaugas Mikužis,&nbsp;Søren Kold","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone-lengthening nails result in various complications with different severity and origin. However, no universal reporting system for complications has been agreed upon, making it difficult to compare different nail designs and patient populations. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater agreement of a classification system of complications according to severity and origin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four orthopaedic surgeons assessed 48 complications retrieved from patient charts in a single-centre cohort and 49 literature complications cases. Complications were classified according to severity grading (I, II, IIIA and IIIB) from Black et al. and origin with eight main types and 33 subtypes. A blinded independent assessment was performed twice at least six weeks apart. Cohen/Congers kappa estimated for the inter- and intra-rater agreement was interpreted after Svanholm et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgeons had a good inter-rater agreement for complication severity with a kappa value of 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.79] and complication origin with a kappa value of 0.63 (CI: 0.53-0.73), respectively, on the cohort cases. In literature cases, a good agreement on complication severity and origin grading was shown by kappa values of 0.64 (CI: 0.53-0.75) and 0.74 (CI: 0.65-0.83). The intra-rater assessment of complication severity and origin grading had good to excellent agreement with kappa values ranging from 0.51 to 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical significance: </strong>The study presents the first structured complication classification on severity and origin in intramedullary bone-lengthening nails. A good reproducibility agreement in both severity and origin was found between four orthopaedic surgeons for both cohort and literature complication cases. For clinical and research purposes, a shared language for communicating complications is essential. We encourage future studies to use a structured and validated complication classification.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Frost MW, Rahbek O, Fridberg M, <i>et al</i>. Do Surgeons Agree on Severity and Origin of Complications in Bone-lengthening Nails? An Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):153-158.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/0f/stlr-17-153.PMC9886029.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Surgeons Agree on Severity and Origin of Complications in Bone-lengthening Nails? An Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Winther Frost,&nbsp;Ole Rahbek,&nbsp;Marie Fridberg,&nbsp;Mindaugas Mikužis,&nbsp;Søren Kold\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone-lengthening nails result in various complications with different severity and origin. However, no universal reporting system for complications has been agreed upon, making it difficult to compare different nail designs and patient populations. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater agreement of a classification system of complications according to severity and origin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four orthopaedic surgeons assessed 48 complications retrieved from patient charts in a single-centre cohort and 49 literature complications cases. Complications were classified according to severity grading (I, II, IIIA and IIIB) from Black et al. and origin with eight main types and 33 subtypes. A blinded independent assessment was performed twice at least six weeks apart. Cohen/Congers kappa estimated for the inter- and intra-rater agreement was interpreted after Svanholm et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgeons had a good inter-rater agreement for complication severity with a kappa value of 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.79] and complication origin with a kappa value of 0.63 (CI: 0.53-0.73), respectively, on the cohort cases. In literature cases, a good agreement on complication severity and origin grading was shown by kappa values of 0.64 (CI: 0.53-0.75) and 0.74 (CI: 0.65-0.83). The intra-rater assessment of complication severity and origin grading had good to excellent agreement with kappa values ranging from 0.51 to 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical significance: </strong>The study presents the first structured complication classification on severity and origin in intramedullary bone-lengthening nails. A good reproducibility agreement in both severity and origin was found between four orthopaedic surgeons for both cohort and literature complication cases. For clinical and research purposes, a shared language for communicating complications is essential. We encourage future studies to use a structured and validated complication classification.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Frost MW, Rahbek O, Fridberg M, <i>et al</i>. Do Surgeons Agree on Severity and Origin of Complications in Bone-lengthening Nails? An Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):153-158.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/0f/stlr-17-153.PMC9886029.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1571\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨延长钉会导致不同严重程度和来源的各种并发症。然而,尚未就并发症的通用报告系统达成一致,因此很难比较不同的指甲设计和患者群体。本研究旨在评估根据严重程度和起源的并发症分类系统的评分者之间和评分者内部的一致性。材料和方法:四名整形外科医生评估了从单中心队列的患者图表中检索到的48例并发症和49例文献并发症病例。并发症根据Black等人的严重程度分级(I、II、IIIA和IIIB)和起源进行分类,分为8种主要类型和33种亚型。至少间隔六周进行两次盲法独立评估。在Svanholm等人之后,对Cohen/Congers评估的评分者间和评分者内一致性进行了解释。结果:在队列病例中,外科医生对并发症严重程度的评分者之间一致性良好,分别为0.68[95%置信区间(CI):0.56-0.79]和0.63(CI:0.53-0.73)的并发症起源。在文献案例中,并发症严重程度和起源分级的kappa值分别为0.64(CI:0.53-0.75)和0.74(CI=0.65-0.83)。评分者内部对并发症严重程度的评估和起源分级有良好到极好的一致性,kappa值范围为0.51到0.97。结论和临床意义:本研究首次对髓内骨延长钉的严重程度和起源。在队列和文献并发症病例中,四名整形外科医生在严重程度和起源方面都发现了良好的再现性一致性。出于临床和研究目的,交流并发症的共享语言至关重要。我们鼓励未来的研究使用结构化和经过验证的并发症分类。如何引用这篇文章:Frost MW,Rahbek O,Fridberg M等人。外科医生对骨延长钉并发症的严重程度和起源达成一致吗?评分者间和评分者内的可靠性研究。创伤肢体康复策略2022;17(3):153-158。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Surgeons Agree on Severity and Origin of Complications in Bone-lengthening Nails? An Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability Study.

Background: Bone-lengthening nails result in various complications with different severity and origin. However, no universal reporting system for complications has been agreed upon, making it difficult to compare different nail designs and patient populations. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater agreement of a classification system of complications according to severity and origin.

Materials and methods: Four orthopaedic surgeons assessed 48 complications retrieved from patient charts in a single-centre cohort and 49 literature complications cases. Complications were classified according to severity grading (I, II, IIIA and IIIB) from Black et al. and origin with eight main types and 33 subtypes. A blinded independent assessment was performed twice at least six weeks apart. Cohen/Congers kappa estimated for the inter- and intra-rater agreement was interpreted after Svanholm et al.

Results: The surgeons had a good inter-rater agreement for complication severity with a kappa value of 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.79] and complication origin with a kappa value of 0.63 (CI: 0.53-0.73), respectively, on the cohort cases. In literature cases, a good agreement on complication severity and origin grading was shown by kappa values of 0.64 (CI: 0.53-0.75) and 0.74 (CI: 0.65-0.83). The intra-rater assessment of complication severity and origin grading had good to excellent agreement with kappa values ranging from 0.51 to 0.97.

Conclusion and clinical significance: The study presents the first structured complication classification on severity and origin in intramedullary bone-lengthening nails. A good reproducibility agreement in both severity and origin was found between four orthopaedic surgeons for both cohort and literature complication cases. For clinical and research purposes, a shared language for communicating complications is essential. We encourage future studies to use a structured and validated complication classification.

How to cite this article: Frost MW, Rahbek O, Fridberg M, et al. Do Surgeons Agree on Severity and Origin of Complications in Bone-lengthening Nails? An Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):153-158.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation. Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1