放射蓝光:比较职业蓝光照射与推荐安全标准。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522
Mari Wentzel, Jacques Janse van Rensburg, Jacobus J Terblans
{"title":"放射蓝光:比较职业蓝光照射与推荐安全标准。","authors":"Mari Wentzel,&nbsp;Jacques Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;Jacobus J Terblans","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The blue-light hazard is a well-documented entity addressing the detrimental health effects of high-energy visible light photons in the range of 305 nm - 450 nm. Radiologists spend long hours in front of multiple light-emitting diode (LED)-based diagnostic monitors emitting blue light, predisposing them to potentially higher blue-light dosages than other health professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to quantify the blue light that radiology registrars are exposed to in daily viewing of diagnostic monitors and compared this with international occupational safety standards.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A limited cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Four radiology registrars at two academic hospitals in Bloemfontein from 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2021 participated. Diagnostic monitor viewing times on a standard workday were determined. Different image modalities obtained from 01 June 2019 to 30 November 2019 were assessed, and blue-light radiance was determined using a spectroscope and image analysis software. Blue-light radiance values were compared with international safety standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiology registrars spent on average 380 min in front of a diagnostic display unit daily. Blue-light radiance from diagnostic monitors was elevated in higher-intensity images such as chest radiographs and lower for darker images like MRI brain studies. The total blue-light radiance from diagnostic display units was more than 10 000 times below the recommended threshold value for blue-light exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blue-light radiance from diagnostic displays measured well below the recommended values for occupational safety. Hence, blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not significantly add to the occupational health burden of radiologists.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Despite spending long hours in front of diagnostic monitors, radiologists' exposure to effective blue-light radiance from monitors was far below hazardous values. This suggests that blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not increase the occupational health burden of radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiology blues: Comparing occupational blue-light exposure to recommended safety standards.\",\"authors\":\"Mari Wentzel,&nbsp;Jacques Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;Jacobus J Terblans\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The blue-light hazard is a well-documented entity addressing the detrimental health effects of high-energy visible light photons in the range of 305 nm - 450 nm. Radiologists spend long hours in front of multiple light-emitting diode (LED)-based diagnostic monitors emitting blue light, predisposing them to potentially higher blue-light dosages than other health professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to quantify the blue light that radiology registrars are exposed to in daily viewing of diagnostic monitors and compared this with international occupational safety standards.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A limited cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Four radiology registrars at two academic hospitals in Bloemfontein from 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2021 participated. Diagnostic monitor viewing times on a standard workday were determined. Different image modalities obtained from 01 June 2019 to 30 November 2019 were assessed, and blue-light radiance was determined using a spectroscope and image analysis software. Blue-light radiance values were compared with international safety standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiology registrars spent on average 380 min in front of a diagnostic display unit daily. Blue-light radiance from diagnostic monitors was elevated in higher-intensity images such as chest radiographs and lower for darker images like MRI brain studies. The total blue-light radiance from diagnostic display units was more than 10 000 times below the recommended threshold value for blue-light exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blue-light radiance from diagnostic displays measured well below the recommended values for occupational safety. Hence, blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not significantly add to the occupational health burden of radiologists.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Despite spending long hours in front of diagnostic monitors, radiologists' exposure to effective blue-light radiance from monitors was far below hazardous values. This suggests that blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not increase the occupational health burden of radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蓝光危害是一个有充分记录的实体,涉及305 nm - 450 nm范围内的高能可见光光子对健康的有害影响。放射科医生长时间在多个发光二极管(LED)诊断监视器前,这些监视器发出蓝光,使他们比其他健康专业人员更容易受到蓝光剂量的影响。目的:作者旨在量化放射学登记员在日常观察诊断监视器时暴露的蓝光,并将其与国际职业安全标准进行比较。方法:采用有限的横断面观察研究。2021年10月1日至2021年11月30日,布隆方丹两家学术医院的四名放射学登记员参加了会议。确定诊断监视器在标准工作日的观看时间。评估了2019年6月1日至2019年11月30日获得的不同图像模式,并使用分光镜和图像分析软件确定了蓝光辐射。将蓝光辐射值与国际安全标准进行比较。结果:放射科登记员平均每天在诊断显示器前花费380分钟。诊断监视器的蓝光辐射在胸部x光片等高强度图像中升高,在MRI脑部研究等较暗图像中降低。诊断显示装置的总蓝光辐射比建议的蓝光照射阈值低1万多倍。结论:诊断显示器的蓝光辐射远低于职业安全的推荐值。因此,来自诊断监视器的蓝光暴露不会显著增加放射科医生的职业健康负担。贡献:尽管在诊断监视器前花了很长时间,放射科医生暴露在监视器的有效蓝光辐射下远低于危险值。这表明,来自诊断监视器的蓝光照射不会增加放射科医生的职业健康负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiology blues: Comparing occupational blue-light exposure to recommended safety standards.

Background: The blue-light hazard is a well-documented entity addressing the detrimental health effects of high-energy visible light photons in the range of 305 nm - 450 nm. Radiologists spend long hours in front of multiple light-emitting diode (LED)-based diagnostic monitors emitting blue light, predisposing them to potentially higher blue-light dosages than other health professionals.

Objectives: The authors aimed to quantify the blue light that radiology registrars are exposed to in daily viewing of diagnostic monitors and compared this with international occupational safety standards.

Method: A limited cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Four radiology registrars at two academic hospitals in Bloemfontein from 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2021 participated. Diagnostic monitor viewing times on a standard workday were determined. Different image modalities obtained from 01 June 2019 to 30 November 2019 were assessed, and blue-light radiance was determined using a spectroscope and image analysis software. Blue-light radiance values were compared with international safety standards.

Results: Radiology registrars spent on average 380 min in front of a diagnostic display unit daily. Blue-light radiance from diagnostic monitors was elevated in higher-intensity images such as chest radiographs and lower for darker images like MRI brain studies. The total blue-light radiance from diagnostic display units was more than 10 000 times below the recommended threshold value for blue-light exposure.

Conclusion: Blue-light radiance from diagnostic displays measured well below the recommended values for occupational safety. Hence, blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not significantly add to the occupational health burden of radiologists.

Contribution: Despite spending long hours in front of diagnostic monitors, radiologists' exposure to effective blue-light radiance from monitors was far below hazardous values. This suggests that blue-light exposure from diagnostic monitors does not increase the occupational health burden of radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
期刊最新文献
Advanced tumour-induced osteomalacia secondary to sinonasal phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. Imaging of pelvic floor disorders involving the posterior compartment on dynamic MR defaecography. Survey on the radiology report at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: Clinician and radiologist perspectives. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Retrospective study of detecting oesophageal injuries post neck trauma: CTA versus fluoroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1