哥伦比亚的透皮贴剂处方:真实世界证据研究。

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-220027
Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, María José Londoño-Serna, Juan Alberto Ospina-Cano, Claudia Giraldo-Giraldo, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
{"title":"哥伦比亚的透皮贴剂处方:真实世界证据研究。","authors":"Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, María José Londoño-Serna, Juan Alberto Ospina-Cano, Claudia Giraldo-Giraldo, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba","doi":"10.3233/JRS-220027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transdermal drug delivery has contributed positively to medical practice. However, prescriptions that do not meet minimum quality criteria and medication errors are common.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine how transdermal patches are being prescribed to a group of patients in Colombia, the compliance with established requirements of such prescriptions and the comparisons between correct and incorrect prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of prescriptions for transdermal patches using data from a population-based drug dispensing database between December 1 and 31, 2019. Medical prescriptions were randomly reviewed, establishing whether the drugs were appropriately prescribed by the manufacturer's indications or national regulations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 415 prescriptions were reviewed; the prescription was provided to 412 patients with a median age of 76.9 years, and 63.3% were women. Rivastigmine was the most prescribed transdermal patch (57.8%). 66.3% of all prescriptions did not meet the minimum appropriate prescribing standards, especially those for rivastigmine (97.1%). The 7.0% of all prescriptions had posology errors, especially prescriptions for buprenorphine (43.8%). Older patients (84.4% vs 52.5%), from the Pacific region (34.4% vs 23.7%), with manual formulations (22.1% vs 0.8%), dementia (49.0% vs 6.8%), and in management with lipid-lowering drugs (41.8% vs 30.5%), presented incorrect transdermal patch formulations more frequently (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high proportion of inappropriately prescribed transdermal patches should draw the attention of those responsible for health care to improve the training of physicians and create prescription quality verification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription of transdermal patches in Colombia: A real-world evidence study.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, María José Londoño-Serna, Juan Alberto Ospina-Cano, Claudia Giraldo-Giraldo, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JRS-220027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transdermal drug delivery has contributed positively to medical practice. However, prescriptions that do not meet minimum quality criteria and medication errors are common.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to determine how transdermal patches are being prescribed to a group of patients in Colombia, the compliance with established requirements of such prescriptions and the comparisons between correct and incorrect prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of prescriptions for transdermal patches using data from a population-based drug dispensing database between December 1 and 31, 2019. Medical prescriptions were randomly reviewed, establishing whether the drugs were appropriately prescribed by the manufacturer's indications or national regulations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 415 prescriptions were reviewed; the prescription was provided to 412 patients with a median age of 76.9 years, and 63.3% were women. Rivastigmine was the most prescribed transdermal patch (57.8%). 66.3% of all prescriptions did not meet the minimum appropriate prescribing standards, especially those for rivastigmine (97.1%). The 7.0% of all prescriptions had posology errors, especially prescriptions for buprenorphine (43.8%). Older patients (84.4% vs 52.5%), from the Pacific region (34.4% vs 23.7%), with manual formulations (22.1% vs 0.8%), dementia (49.0% vs 6.8%), and in management with lipid-lowering drugs (41.8% vs 30.5%), presented incorrect transdermal patch formulations more frequently (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high proportion of inappropriately prescribed transdermal patches should draw the attention of those responsible for health care to improve the training of physicians and create prescription quality verification systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-220027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-220027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:透皮给药对医疗实践做出了积极贡献。然而,不符合最低质量标准的处方和用药错误屡见不鲜:目的:旨在确定哥伦比亚一组患者的透皮贴剂处方情况、此类处方是否符合既定要求以及正确处方与错误处方之间的比较:这是一项关于透皮贴剂处方的横断面研究,使用的数据来自 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 31 日期间基于人口的配药数据库。对医疗处方进行随机审查,确定药物是否符合制造商的适应症或国家法规。对结果进行了描述性分析和双变量分析:共审查了 415 份处方;处方提供给 412 名患者,中位年龄为 76.9 岁,63.3% 为女性。利伐斯的明是处方量最大的透皮贴剂(57.8%)。66.3%的处方不符合最低适当处方标准,尤其是利伐斯的明(97.1%)。在所有处方中,有 7.0% 的处方存在姿势错误,尤其是丁丙诺啡的处方(43.8%)。年龄较大(84.4% 对 52.5%)、来自太平洋地区(34.4% 对 23.7%)、使用手动配方(22.1% 对 0.8%)、患有痴呆症(49.0% 对 6.8%)以及正在使用降脂药物(41.8% 对 30.5%)的患者更经常出现错误的透皮贴剂配方(p 结论:在所有处方中,有 7.0%的处方存在姿势学错误,尤其是丁丙诺啡的处方(43.8%):处方不当的透皮贴剂比例较高,应引起医疗保健负责人的注意,以加强对医生的培训并建立处方质量核查系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Prescription of transdermal patches in Colombia: A real-world evidence study.

Background: Transdermal drug delivery has contributed positively to medical practice. However, prescriptions that do not meet minimum quality criteria and medication errors are common.

Objective: The objective was to determine how transdermal patches are being prescribed to a group of patients in Colombia, the compliance with established requirements of such prescriptions and the comparisons between correct and incorrect prescriptions.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of prescriptions for transdermal patches using data from a population-based drug dispensing database between December 1 and 31, 2019. Medical prescriptions were randomly reviewed, establishing whether the drugs were appropriately prescribed by the manufacturer's indications or national regulations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 415 prescriptions were reviewed; the prescription was provided to 412 patients with a median age of 76.9 years, and 63.3% were women. Rivastigmine was the most prescribed transdermal patch (57.8%). 66.3% of all prescriptions did not meet the minimum appropriate prescribing standards, especially those for rivastigmine (97.1%). The 7.0% of all prescriptions had posology errors, especially prescriptions for buprenorphine (43.8%). Older patients (84.4% vs 52.5%), from the Pacific region (34.4% vs 23.7%), with manual formulations (22.1% vs 0.8%), dementia (49.0% vs 6.8%), and in management with lipid-lowering drugs (41.8% vs 30.5%), presented incorrect transdermal patch formulations more frequently (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The high proportion of inappropriately prescribed transdermal patches should draw the attention of those responsible for health care to improve the training of physicians and create prescription quality verification systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1