左心房重塑对心脏再同步化疗法反应的预测价值

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.15557/jou.2022.0027
Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Thomas Mast, Frits Prinzen, Lukas Dekker, Patrick Houthuizen
{"title":"左心房重塑对心脏再同步化疗法反应的预测价值","authors":"Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Thomas Mast, Frits Prinzen, Lukas Dekker, Patrick Houthuizen","doi":"10.15557/jou.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy varies significantly among patients, with one third of them failing to demonstrate left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left atrial size and function is increasingly recognized as a marker of disease severity in the heart failure population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether echocardiographic left atrial indices predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-nine cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates were prospectively included in the study and underwent echocardiography before and 3-months after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response was defined as a 15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Indexed left atrial volume, left atrial reservoir strain, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction along with other known predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy response (gender, etiology of heart failure, presence of typical left bundle branch block pattern, QRS duration >150 ms) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cardiac resynchronization therapy response occurred in <i>n</i> = 63 (64%) patients. The presence of a typical left bundle branch block (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-12.1, <i>p</i> = 0.009), QRS duration >150 ms (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-11.0, <i>p</i> = 0.029), and left atrial volume index (OR: 0.6, 95 CI: 0.4-0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.012) remained the only significant predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response after three months. None of the baseline left ventricular parameters showed an independent predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Left atrial size at baseline is an independent predictor and is inversely proportional to left ventricular volumetric reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/1d/jou-22-e168.PMC9714286.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of Left Atrial Remodeling for Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Thomas Mast, Frits Prinzen, Lukas Dekker, Patrick Houthuizen\",\"doi\":\"10.15557/jou.2022.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy varies significantly among patients, with one third of them failing to demonstrate left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left atrial size and function is increasingly recognized as a marker of disease severity in the heart failure population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether echocardiographic left atrial indices predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety-nine cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates were prospectively included in the study and underwent echocardiography before and 3-months after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response was defined as a 15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Indexed left atrial volume, left atrial reservoir strain, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction along with other known predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy response (gender, etiology of heart failure, presence of typical left bundle branch block pattern, QRS duration >150 ms) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cardiac resynchronization therapy response occurred in <i>n</i> = 63 (64%) patients. The presence of a typical left bundle branch block (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-12.1, <i>p</i> = 0.009), QRS duration >150 ms (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-11.0, <i>p</i> = 0.029), and left atrial volume index (OR: 0.6, 95 CI: 0.4-0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.012) remained the only significant predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response after three months. None of the baseline left ventricular parameters showed an independent predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Left atrial size at baseline is an independent predictor and is inversely proportional to left ventricular volumetric reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f3/1d/jou-22-e168.PMC9714286.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2022.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2022.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不同患者对心脏再同步化治疗的反应差异很大,其中三分之一的患者在接受心脏再同步化治疗后未能表现出左心室反向重塑。左心房的大小和功能越来越被认为是心衰人群疾病严重程度的标志。本研究旨在评估超声心动图左心房指数是否能预测心脏再同步化治疗后左心室反向重构的情况:该研究前瞻性地纳入了 99 名心脏再同步化治疗候选者,他们在心脏再同步化治疗植入前和植入后 3 个月接受了超声心动图检查。心脏再同步治疗反应定义为左心室收缩末期容积相对减少 15%。指数化左房容积、左房储血室应变、左室舒张末期容积、左室射血分数以及其他已知的心脏再同步化治疗反应预测因素(性别、心衰病因、是否存在典型的左束支传导阻滞模式、QRS时程是否大于150毫秒)被纳入多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定心脏再同步化治疗反应的预测因素:n=63(64%)名患者出现了心脏再同步化治疗反应。典型左束支传导阻滞(OR 4.2,95 CI:1.4-12.1,p = 0.009)、QRS 持续时间大于 150 ms(OR 4.2,95 CI:1.4-11.0,p = 0.029)和左房容积指数(OR:0.6,95 CI:0.4-0.9,p = 0.012)仍然是三个月后心脏再同步化治疗反应的唯一显著预测因素。没有一个基线左心室参数显示出独立的预测价值:结论:基线左房大小是一个独立的预测因素,并且与心脏再同步化治疗患者的左心室容积反向重塑成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Value of Left Atrial Remodeling for Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Aim: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy varies significantly among patients, with one third of them failing to demonstrate left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left atrial size and function is increasingly recognized as a marker of disease severity in the heart failure population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether echocardiographic left atrial indices predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Materials and methods: Ninety-nine cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates were prospectively included in the study and underwent echocardiography before and 3-months after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response was defined as a 15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Indexed left atrial volume, left atrial reservoir strain, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction along with other known predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy response (gender, etiology of heart failure, presence of typical left bundle branch block pattern, QRS duration >150 ms) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

Results: Cardiac resynchronization therapy response occurred in n = 63 (64%) patients. The presence of a typical left bundle branch block (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-12.1, p = 0.009), QRS duration >150 ms (OR 4.2, 95 CI: 1.4-11.0, p = 0.029), and left atrial volume index (OR: 0.6, 95 CI: 0.4-0.9, p = 0.012) remained the only significant predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response after three months. None of the baseline left ventricular parameters showed an independent predictive value.

Conclusion: Left atrial size at baseline is an independent predictor and is inversely proportional to left ventricular volumetric reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasonography
Journal of Ultrasonography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The ileocecal valve in transabdominal ultrasound Part 1: Sonographic anatomy and technique Overview for developing Delphi-based interdisciplinary consensus statements on imaging: pros and cons The pattern of renal artery Doppler indices in patients with sickle cell disease Advantages of UltrafastTM ultrasound in the screening for renal artery disease Uterine vascular abnormalities linked to pregnancy complications: color and power Doppler-assisted transvaginal ultrasound evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1