生殖权利,生殖正义:重新定义挑战,为所有妇女创造最佳健康。

Chukwudi Onwuachi-Saunders, Que P Dang, Jedidah Murray
{"title":"生殖权利,生殖正义:重新定义挑战,为所有妇女创造最佳健康。","authors":"Chukwudi Onwuachi-Saunders,&nbsp;Que P Dang,&nbsp;Jedidah Murray","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) defines reproductive health as the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive Justice is the complete physical, mental, spiritual, political, social, and economic wellbeing of women and girls, based on the full achievement and protection of women's human rights. While these concepts are similar, the latter was an approach that grew out of the need to better articulate the language and realities of women of color as it related to sexual and reproductive health issues. The current U.S. reproductive health agenda is polarized to a choice or abortion issue without any alignment to other issues that predominantly impact women of color within the reproductive health framework. This article acknowledges the history and challenges of reproductive health and rights, while offering a non-polarized, more inclusive ethical course of action, using an optimal health approach with new alliances for the reproductive justice movement today.</p>","PeriodicalId":73773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930478/pdf/jhsh-9-19.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Justice: Redefining Challenges to Create Optimal Health for All Women.\",\"authors\":\"Chukwudi Onwuachi-Saunders,&nbsp;Que P Dang,&nbsp;Jedidah Murray\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) defines reproductive health as the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive Justice is the complete physical, mental, spiritual, political, social, and economic wellbeing of women and girls, based on the full achievement and protection of women's human rights. While these concepts are similar, the latter was an approach that grew out of the need to better articulate the language and realities of women of color as it related to sexual and reproductive health issues. The current U.S. reproductive health agenda is polarized to a choice or abortion issue without any alignment to other issues that predominantly impact women of color within the reproductive health framework. This article acknowledges the history and challenges of reproductive health and rights, while offering a non-polarized, more inclusive ethical course of action, using an optimal health approach with new alliances for the reproductive justice movement today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930478/pdf/jhsh-9-19.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(卫生组织)将生殖健康定义为:在与生殖系统及其功能和过程有关的一切事项上,身体、精神和社会健康的完全状态,而不仅仅是没有疾病或虚弱。生殖正义是妇女和女童在充分实现和保护妇女人权的基础上,在身体、心理、精神、政治、社会和经济方面的全面福祉。虽然这些概念是相似的,但后者是一种方法,因为需要更好地阐明与性和生殖健康问题有关的有色人种妇女的语言和现实。目前美国的生殖健康议程在选择或堕胎问题上两极分化,而没有与生殖健康框架内主要影响有色人种妇女的其他问题保持一致。本文承认生殖健康和权利的历史和挑战,同时提供一种非两极分化、更具包容性的道德行动方针,采用最佳健康方法,为今天的生殖正义运动建立新的联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Justice: Redefining Challenges to Create Optimal Health for All Women.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines reproductive health as the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive Justice is the complete physical, mental, spiritual, political, social, and economic wellbeing of women and girls, based on the full achievement and protection of women's human rights. While these concepts are similar, the latter was an approach that grew out of the need to better articulate the language and realities of women of color as it related to sexual and reproductive health issues. The current U.S. reproductive health agenda is polarized to a choice or abortion issue without any alignment to other issues that predominantly impact women of color within the reproductive health framework. This article acknowledges the history and challenges of reproductive health and rights, while offering a non-polarized, more inclusive ethical course of action, using an optimal health approach with new alliances for the reproductive justice movement today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The United States Constitution and The Hypocrisy of the American Oath: January 6th Raid on The Capital. HIV-Related Mistrust (or HIV Genocidal Conspiracy Theories) among African Americans Living with HIV in Rural Alabama. White Reprieves and Black Rage: The Augmentation of Educational Policy and Racial Protests in the Era of COVID-19. Rural Hospital Closures in Tennessee: Centering Community Residents' Voices to Identify Public Health Ethical Issues and Inform Policy Strategies. Examining the Frequency of Religious Practices among Hypertensive and Non-Hypertensive Black Men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1