机器人辅助移植肾切除术:案例系列和提高采用率的培训模式。

Michael McCabe, Thomas Osinski, Randeep Kashyap, Jeremy Taylor, Nathan Schuler, Lauren Shepard, Ahmed Ghazi, Katie Helbig, M Katherine Dokus, Amit Nair, Karen Pineda-Solis, Mark Orloff, Guan Wu
{"title":"机器人辅助移植肾切除术:案例系列和提高采用率的培训模式。","authors":"Michael McCabe,&nbsp;Thomas Osinski,&nbsp;Randeep Kashyap,&nbsp;Jeremy Taylor,&nbsp;Nathan Schuler,&nbsp;Lauren Shepard,&nbsp;Ahmed Ghazi,&nbsp;Katie Helbig,&nbsp;M Katherine Dokus,&nbsp;Amit Nair,&nbsp;Karen Pineda-Solis,&nbsp;Mark Orloff,&nbsp;Guan Wu","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open transplant nephrectomy for failed renal allograft is an invasive procedure associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive surgical approaches have improved a variety of patient outcomes for many surgeries. Thus, robotic assisted transplant nephrectomy (RATN) potentially offers significant patient benefit. Although previously reported, there remains a paucity of data on RATN outcomes and techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four perfused, high-fidelity hydrogel models were created using previously described techniques and used for simulated RATN. Subsequently performed institutional cases were included for analysis. Intra- and postoperative variables along with patient demographics were retrospectively obtained through parsing of patient records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated nephrectomy time was 67.33 minutes (35.75 - 98.91). Five patients underwent RATN. There were four male and one female patients. The average age was 47 years. The most common indication was abdominal pain secondary to rejection (3/5). Mean blood loss was 188 mL; mean operative time was 243 minutes, and mean length of stay was 4.5 days. Intraoperatively there were two incidences of small cystotomies. One patient was readmitted within 30 days for intraabdominal abscess.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds to the growing literature around RATN, demonstrating the feasibility of the technique and reporting good outcomes for this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913067/pdf/e2022.00079.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Assisted Transplant Nephrectomy: Case Series and Training Model for Improving Adoption.\",\"authors\":\"Michael McCabe,&nbsp;Thomas Osinski,&nbsp;Randeep Kashyap,&nbsp;Jeremy Taylor,&nbsp;Nathan Schuler,&nbsp;Lauren Shepard,&nbsp;Ahmed Ghazi,&nbsp;Katie Helbig,&nbsp;M Katherine Dokus,&nbsp;Amit Nair,&nbsp;Karen Pineda-Solis,&nbsp;Mark Orloff,&nbsp;Guan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open transplant nephrectomy for failed renal allograft is an invasive procedure associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive surgical approaches have improved a variety of patient outcomes for many surgeries. Thus, robotic assisted transplant nephrectomy (RATN) potentially offers significant patient benefit. Although previously reported, there remains a paucity of data on RATN outcomes and techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four perfused, high-fidelity hydrogel models were created using previously described techniques and used for simulated RATN. Subsequently performed institutional cases were included for analysis. Intra- and postoperative variables along with patient demographics were retrospectively obtained through parsing of patient records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated nephrectomy time was 67.33 minutes (35.75 - 98.91). Five patients underwent RATN. There were four male and one female patients. The average age was 47 years. The most common indication was abdominal pain secondary to rejection (3/5). Mean blood loss was 188 mL; mean operative time was 243 minutes, and mean length of stay was 4.5 days. Intraoperatively there were two incidences of small cystotomies. One patient was readmitted within 30 days for intraabdominal abscess.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds to the growing literature around RATN, demonstrating the feasibility of the technique and reporting good outcomes for this cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913067/pdf/e2022.00079.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

开放式移植肾切除术治疗同种异体肾移植失败是一种侵入性手术,其围手术期的发病率和死亡率都很高。微创手术方法改善了许多手术患者的各种预后。因此,机器人辅助移植肾切除术(RATN)可能会给患者带来显著的益处。虽然以前有报道,但关于RATN结果和技术的数据仍然缺乏。方法:使用先前描述的技术创建四个灌注的高保真水凝胶模型,并用于模拟RATN。随后进行的机构病例被纳入分析。通过对患者记录的分析,回顾性地获得了手术内和术后的变量以及患者的人口统计数据。结果:模拟肾切除术时间为67.33 min(35.75 ~ 98.91)。5例患者行RATN。患者男4名,女1名。平均年龄为47岁。最常见的适应症是排异反应引起的腹痛(3/5)。平均失血量188 mL;平均手术时间243分钟,平均住院时间4.5天。术中出现2例小膀胱切开术。1例患者因腹腔内脓肿在30天内再次入院。结论:本研究增加了关于RATN的文献,证明了该技术的可行性,并报告了该队列的良好结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic Assisted Transplant Nephrectomy: Case Series and Training Model for Improving Adoption.

Introduction: Open transplant nephrectomy for failed renal allograft is an invasive procedure associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive surgical approaches have improved a variety of patient outcomes for many surgeries. Thus, robotic assisted transplant nephrectomy (RATN) potentially offers significant patient benefit. Although previously reported, there remains a paucity of data on RATN outcomes and techniques.

Methods: Four perfused, high-fidelity hydrogel models were created using previously described techniques and used for simulated RATN. Subsequently performed institutional cases were included for analysis. Intra- and postoperative variables along with patient demographics were retrospectively obtained through parsing of patient records.

Results: Simulated nephrectomy time was 67.33 minutes (35.75 - 98.91). Five patients underwent RATN. There were four male and one female patients. The average age was 47 years. The most common indication was abdominal pain secondary to rejection (3/5). Mean blood loss was 188 mL; mean operative time was 243 minutes, and mean length of stay was 4.5 days. Intraoperatively there were two incidences of small cystotomies. One patient was readmitted within 30 days for intraabdominal abscess.

Conclusion: This study adds to the growing literature around RATN, demonstrating the feasibility of the technique and reporting good outcomes for this cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair. Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy. Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1