对成年住院病人自杀筛查问题的验证:一个适用于所有年龄段的简短工具

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Psychosomatics Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008
Lisa M. Horowitz Ph.D., M.P.H. , Deborah J. Snyder M.S.W. , Edwin D. Boudreaux Ph.D. , Jian-Ping He M.S. , Colin J. Harrington M.D. , June Cai M.D. , Cynthia A. Claassen Ph.D. , Joan E. Salhany M.B.A.H.C.M., R.N. , Tram Dao Psy.D. , John F. Chaves M.D. , David A. Jobes Ph.D. , Kathleen R. Merikangas Ph.D. , Jeffrey A. Bridge Ph.D. , Maryland Pao M.D.
{"title":"对成年住院病人自杀筛查问题的验证:一个适用于所有年龄段的简短工具","authors":"Lisa M. Horowitz Ph.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Deborah J. Snyder M.S.W. ,&nbsp;Edwin D. Boudreaux Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jian-Ping He M.S. ,&nbsp;Colin J. Harrington M.D. ,&nbsp;June Cai M.D. ,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Claassen Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joan E. Salhany M.B.A.H.C.M., R.N. ,&nbsp;Tram Dao Psy.D. ,&nbsp;John F. Chaves M.D. ,&nbsp;David A. Jobes Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Merikangas Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Bridge Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maryland Pao M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Few brief suicide risk screening instruments are validated for use in both adult and pediatric medical populations. Using the pediatric Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) development study as a model, this study aimed to determine whether the ASQ is a valid suicide risk–screening instrument for use among adults medical patients, as well as to evaluate a set of other potential screening questions for use in adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult patients hospitalized on inpatient medical/surgical units from 4 hospitals were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional instrument-validation study. The 4-item ASQ and other candidate items were compared against the 25-item, previously validated Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire as the criterion standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 727 adult medical inpatients completed the screening process. Compared with the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire, the ASQ performed best among the full set of candidate items, demonstrating strong psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval = 90%–100%), a specificity of 89% (95% confidence interval = 86%–91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval = 99%–100%). A total of 4.8% (35/727) of the participants screened positive for suicide risk based on the standard criterion Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ASQ is a valid and brief suicide risk–screening tool for use among adults. Screening medical/surgical inpatients for suicide risk can be performed effectively for both adult and pediatric patients using this brief, primary screener.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20746,"journal":{"name":"Psychosomatics","volume":"61 6","pages":"Pages 713-722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions for Adult Medical Inpatients: A Brief Tool for All Ages\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M. Horowitz Ph.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Deborah J. Snyder M.S.W. ,&nbsp;Edwin D. Boudreaux Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jian-Ping He M.S. ,&nbsp;Colin J. Harrington M.D. ,&nbsp;June Cai M.D. ,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Claassen Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Joan E. Salhany M.B.A.H.C.M., R.N. ,&nbsp;Tram Dao Psy.D. ,&nbsp;John F. Chaves M.D. ,&nbsp;David A. Jobes Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Kathleen R. Merikangas Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Bridge Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maryland Pao M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Few brief suicide risk screening instruments are validated for use in both adult and pediatric medical populations. Using the pediatric Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) development study as a model, this study aimed to determine whether the ASQ is a valid suicide risk–screening instrument for use among adults medical patients, as well as to evaluate a set of other potential screening questions for use in adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult patients hospitalized on inpatient medical/surgical units from 4 hospitals were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional instrument-validation study. The 4-item ASQ and other candidate items were compared against the 25-item, previously validated Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire as the criterion standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 727 adult medical inpatients completed the screening process. Compared with the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire, the ASQ performed best among the full set of candidate items, demonstrating strong psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval = 90%–100%), a specificity of 89% (95% confidence interval = 86%–91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval = 99%–100%). A total of 4.8% (35/727) of the participants screened positive for suicide risk based on the standard criterion Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ASQ is a valid and brief suicide risk–screening tool for use among adults. Screening medical/surgical inpatients for suicide risk can be performed effectively for both adult and pediatric patients using this brief, primary screener.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosomatics\",\"volume\":\"61 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 713-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318220301201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318220301201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

摘要

背景:很少有简短的自杀风险筛查工具被证实适用于成人和儿科医疗人群。本研究以儿科自杀筛查问题(ASQ)发展研究为模型,旨在确定ASQ是否是一种有效的成人医疗患者自杀风险筛查工具,并评估一组其他可能用于成人的筛查问题。方法选取4所医院内科/外科住院的成年患者进行横断面仪器验证研究。将4项ASQ和其他候选项目与先前验证的25项成人自杀意念问卷作为判定标准进行比较。结果共有727名成年住院患者完成了筛查。与成人自杀意念问卷相比,ASQ在所有候选项目中表现最好,表现出较强的心理测量特性,灵敏度为100%(95%置信区间= 90% ~ 100%),特异性为89%(95%置信区间= 86% ~ 91%),负预测值为100%(95%置信区间= 99% ~ 100%)。在成人自杀意念量表中,有4.8%(35/727)的被试有自杀倾向。结论ASQ是一种有效、简便的成人自杀风险筛查工具。筛选医疗/外科住院病人的自杀风险可以有效地为成人和儿童患者使用这个简短的,初级筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions for Adult Medical Inpatients: A Brief Tool for All Ages

Background

Few brief suicide risk screening instruments are validated for use in both adult and pediatric medical populations. Using the pediatric Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) development study as a model, this study aimed to determine whether the ASQ is a valid suicide risk–screening instrument for use among adults medical patients, as well as to evaluate a set of other potential screening questions for use in adults.

Methods

Adult patients hospitalized on inpatient medical/surgical units from 4 hospitals were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional instrument-validation study. The 4-item ASQ and other candidate items were compared against the 25-item, previously validated Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire as the criterion standard.

Results

A total of 727 adult medical inpatients completed the screening process. Compared with the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire, the ASQ performed best among the full set of candidate items, demonstrating strong psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval = 90%–100%), a specificity of 89% (95% confidence interval = 86%–91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval = 99%–100%). A total of 4.8% (35/727) of the participants screened positive for suicide risk based on the standard criterion Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.

Conclusions

The ASQ is a valid and brief suicide risk–screening tool for use among adults. Screening medical/surgical inpatients for suicide risk can be performed effectively for both adult and pediatric patients using this brief, primary screener.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychosomatics
Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Psychosomatics is to be the leading psychiatry journal focused on the care of patients with comorbid medical and psychiatric illnesses. The scope of Psychosomatics includes original research, review articles and clinical reports that address psychiatric aspects of medical illnesses and their management. Areas of particular interest include: the effect of co-morbid psychiatric conditions on the management of medical illness; the psychiatric management of patients with comorbid medical illness; educational content for physicians and others specializing in consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry; and, the provision of psychiatric services to medical populations, including integrated care.
期刊最新文献
Finerenone in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: The FIDELIO-DKD Subgroup from China. Trier Social Stress Test Elevates Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Anxiety, But a Singing Test or Unsolvable Anagrams Only Elevates Heart Rate, among Healthy Young Adults Cortisol and Testosterone in Leadership Practice Theory of Mind Ability and Socioeconomic Status, a Study of Street-Connected Children and Adolescents in Ecuador КОПІНГ-ЗАХИСНІ МЕХАНІЗМИ САМОРЕГУЛЯЦІЇ ПСИХОЛОГІВ У СТРЕСОВИХ СИТУАЦІЯХ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1