胶质瘤质子磁共振波谱两种后处理分析方法的评价。

Erfan Saatchian, Sina Ehsani, Alireza Montazerabadi
{"title":"胶质瘤质子磁共振波谱两种后处理分析方法的评价。","authors":"Erfan Saatchian,&nbsp;Sina Ehsani,&nbsp;Alireza Montazerabadi","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive diagnostic and the neuroimaging method of choice for the noninvasive monitoring of brain metabolism in patients with glioma tumors. <sup>1</sup>H-MRS is a reliable and non-invasive tool used to study glioma. However, the metabolite spectra obtained by <sup>1</sup>H-MRS requires a specific quantification procedure for post-processing. According to our knowledge, no comparisons have yet been made between spectrum analysis software for quantification of gliomas metabolites.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current study aims to evaluate the difference between this two common software in quantifying cerebral metabolites.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this analytical study, we evaluate two post-processing software packages, java-based graphical for MR user interface packages (jMRUI) and totally automatic robust quantitation in NMR (TARQUIN) software. <sup>1</sup>H-MRS spectrum from the brain of patients with gliomas tumors was collected for post-processing. AMARES algorithms were conducted to metabolite qualification on jMRUI software, and TARQUIN software were implemented with automated quantification algorithms. The study included a total of 30 subjects. For quantification, subjects were divided into a normal group (n=15) and group of gliomas (n=15).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When calculated by TARQUIN, the mean metabolites ratio was typically lower than by jMRUI. While, the mean ratio of metabolites varied when quantified by jMRUI vs. TARQUIN, both methods apparent clinical associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TARQUIN and jMRUI are feasible choices for the post-processing of cerebral MRS data obtained from glioma tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/b2/JBPE-13-39.PMC9923243.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Two Post-Processing Analysis Methods of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Glioma Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Saatchian,&nbsp;Sina Ehsani,&nbsp;Alireza Montazerabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive diagnostic and the neuroimaging method of choice for the noninvasive monitoring of brain metabolism in patients with glioma tumors. <sup>1</sup>H-MRS is a reliable and non-invasive tool used to study glioma. However, the metabolite spectra obtained by <sup>1</sup>H-MRS requires a specific quantification procedure for post-processing. According to our knowledge, no comparisons have yet been made between spectrum analysis software for quantification of gliomas metabolites.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current study aims to evaluate the difference between this two common software in quantifying cerebral metabolites.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this analytical study, we evaluate two post-processing software packages, java-based graphical for MR user interface packages (jMRUI) and totally automatic robust quantitation in NMR (TARQUIN) software. <sup>1</sup>H-MRS spectrum from the brain of patients with gliomas tumors was collected for post-processing. AMARES algorithms were conducted to metabolite qualification on jMRUI software, and TARQUIN software were implemented with automated quantification algorithms. The study included a total of 30 subjects. For quantification, subjects were divided into a normal group (n=15) and group of gliomas (n=15).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When calculated by TARQUIN, the mean metabolites ratio was typically lower than by jMRUI. While, the mean ratio of metabolites varied when quantified by jMRUI vs. TARQUIN, both methods apparent clinical associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TARQUIN and jMRUI are feasible choices for the post-processing of cerebral MRS data obtained from glioma tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/b2/JBPE-13-39.PMC9923243.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:磁共振波谱(MRS)是神经胶质瘤患者无创脑代谢监测的一种非侵入性诊断和神经影像学方法。1H-MRS是一种可靠的、无创的神经胶质瘤研究工具。然而,通过1H-MRS获得的代谢物光谱需要一个特定的定量程序进行后处理。据我们所知,还没有比较频谱分析软件定量胶质瘤代谢物。目的:本研究旨在评价这两种常用软件在量化脑代谢物方面的差异。材料和方法:在本分析研究中,我们评估了两个后处理软件包,基于java的图形化磁共振用户界面软件包(jMRUI)和全自动核磁共振鲁棒定量软件(TARQUIN)。采集脑胶质瘤患者的1H-MRS谱进行后处理。在jMRUI软件上使用AMARES算法进行代谢物鉴定,在TARQUIN软件上使用自动定量算法进行鉴定。该研究共包括30名受试者。为了量化,将受试者分为正常组(n=15)和胶质瘤组(n=15)。结果:TARQUIN计算的平均代谢物比值明显低于jMRUI。然而,当jMRUI和TARQUIN量化代谢物的平均比率时,两种方法都有明显的临床相关性。结论:TARQUIN和jMRUI是脑胶质瘤MRS数据后处理的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Two Post-Processing Analysis Methods of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Glioma Tumors.

Background: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive diagnostic and the neuroimaging method of choice for the noninvasive monitoring of brain metabolism in patients with glioma tumors. 1H-MRS is a reliable and non-invasive tool used to study glioma. However, the metabolite spectra obtained by 1H-MRS requires a specific quantification procedure for post-processing. According to our knowledge, no comparisons have yet been made between spectrum analysis software for quantification of gliomas metabolites.

Objective: Current study aims to evaluate the difference between this two common software in quantifying cerebral metabolites.

Material and methods: In this analytical study, we evaluate two post-processing software packages, java-based graphical for MR user interface packages (jMRUI) and totally automatic robust quantitation in NMR (TARQUIN) software. 1H-MRS spectrum from the brain of patients with gliomas tumors was collected for post-processing. AMARES algorithms were conducted to metabolite qualification on jMRUI software, and TARQUIN software were implemented with automated quantification algorithms. The study included a total of 30 subjects. For quantification, subjects were divided into a normal group (n=15) and group of gliomas (n=15).

Results: When calculated by TARQUIN, the mean metabolites ratio was typically lower than by jMRUI. While, the mean ratio of metabolites varied when quantified by jMRUI vs. TARQUIN, both methods apparent clinical associations.

Conclusion: TARQUIN and jMRUI are feasible choices for the post-processing of cerebral MRS data obtained from glioma tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
期刊最新文献
A Neural Network-based Approach to Prediction of Preterm Birth using Non-invasive Tests. Altered Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations of rs-fMRI Signal followed by rTMS Analgesic Effects in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Patients. Comparative Evaluation of LED Light Application and Heat Generation with Three Different Wavelengths of Frequency on Soft Tissues in Bringing Faster Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Finite Element Model Study. Feasibility of Robot-Assistance Hand Physiotherapy in Post-Stroke Patients. Impact of Electronic Collimation on Reducing Unnecessary Patient Dose in Digital Radiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1