职业卫生专业人员工效学知识与纸笔观察法应用的混合方法调查

Abdolhamid Tajvar, Hadi Daneshmandi, Mozhgan Seif, Hossein Parsaei, Alireza Choobineh
{"title":"职业卫生专业人员工效学知识与纸笔观察法应用的混合方法调查","authors":"Abdolhamid Tajvar,&nbsp;Hadi Daneshmandi,&nbsp;Mozhgan Seif,&nbsp;Hossein Parsaei,&nbsp;Alireza Choobineh","doi":"10.1080/24725838.2022.2138637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSErgonomic risk assessment is a key step in managing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Diverse assessment methods exist, and errors may occur if inappropriate methods are selected. Understanding the level of knowledge, how to use methods, and exploring factors affecting erroneous usage of these methods, can provide useful information for health and safety regulatory authorities and decision-makers to identify problems and determine an action plan to eliminate them. We found that Iranian occupational health specialists have little knowledge about the types of pen-and-paper observational methods (OMs), and most of them use a limited number of these methods. Content analysis of interviews identified three main categories of influential factors and 12 subcategories. The main categories were educational, individual, and organizational factors. These results suggest the need for more effort to ensure that practitioners possess better knowledge and skills in the selection and application of pen-and-paper OMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73332,"journal":{"name":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"10 4","pages":"182-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Occupational Health Specialists' Knowledge and Application of Pen-and-Paper Observational Methods for Ergonomics Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Abdolhamid Tajvar,&nbsp;Hadi Daneshmandi,&nbsp;Mozhgan Seif,&nbsp;Hossein Parsaei,&nbsp;Alireza Choobineh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725838.2022.2138637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSErgonomic risk assessment is a key step in managing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Diverse assessment methods exist, and errors may occur if inappropriate methods are selected. Understanding the level of knowledge, how to use methods, and exploring factors affecting erroneous usage of these methods, can provide useful information for health and safety regulatory authorities and decision-makers to identify problems and determine an action plan to eliminate them. We found that Iranian occupational health specialists have little knowledge about the types of pen-and-paper observational methods (OMs), and most of them use a limited number of these methods. Content analysis of interviews identified three main categories of influential factors and 12 subcategories. The main categories were educational, individual, and organizational factors. These results suggest the need for more effort to ensure that practitioners possess better knowledge and skills in the selection and application of pen-and-paper OMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"182-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2138637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2138637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

职业应用基因组风险评估是管理与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的关键步骤。评估方法多种多样,如果选择不当,可能会产生误差。了解知识水平、如何使用方法以及探索影响这些方法错误使用的因素,可以为健康和安全监管机构和决策者提供有用的信息,以确定问题并确定消除问题的行动计划。我们发现,伊朗职业卫生专家对纸笔观察方法(OMs)的类型知之甚少,他们中的大多数人使用的方法数量有限。访谈内容分析确定了影响因素的三个主要类别和12个子类别。主要的类别是教育、个人和组织因素。这些结果表明,需要作出更多努力,以确保从业人员在选择和应用笔和纸的OMs方面拥有更好的知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Occupational Health Specialists' Knowledge and Application of Pen-and-Paper Observational Methods for Ergonomics Assessment.

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSErgonomic risk assessment is a key step in managing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Diverse assessment methods exist, and errors may occur if inappropriate methods are selected. Understanding the level of knowledge, how to use methods, and exploring factors affecting erroneous usage of these methods, can provide useful information for health and safety regulatory authorities and decision-makers to identify problems and determine an action plan to eliminate them. We found that Iranian occupational health specialists have little knowledge about the types of pen-and-paper observational methods (OMs), and most of them use a limited number of these methods. Content analysis of interviews identified three main categories of influential factors and 12 subcategories. The main categories were educational, individual, and organizational factors. These results suggest the need for more effort to ensure that practitioners possess better knowledge and skills in the selection and application of pen-and-paper OMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Iterative Design Method for Advancing Air Traffic Control and Management Training Through Immersive VFR 3D Map Visualization. Wearable Technology Hesitancy in Industrial Applications. Investigating Safety Awareness in Assembly Operations via Mixed Reality Technology. Strategies to Reduce Fall Severity after a Perturbation during Ladder Climbing. Gender Swap in Virtual Reality for Supporting Inclusion and Implications in the Workplace.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1