三种不同方法制备的二硅酸锂冠在不同位置的配合评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305
Hayeong Kim, Seoung-Jin Hong, Youngha Choi, Younghoo Lee, Hur Won, Hyeong-Seob Kim, Ahran Pae
{"title":"三种不同方法制备的二硅酸锂冠在不同位置的配合评估。","authors":"Hayeong Kim,&nbsp;Seoung-Jin Hong,&nbsp;Youngha Choi,&nbsp;Younghoo Lee,&nbsp;Hur Won,&nbsp;Hyeong-Seob Kim,&nbsp;Ahran Pae","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triple-scan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were significantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and milling method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305).</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"26 1","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations fabricated by three different methods using the triple-scan protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Hayeong Kim,&nbsp;Seoung-Jin Hong,&nbsp;Youngha Choi,&nbsp;Younghoo Lee,&nbsp;Hur Won,&nbsp;Hyeong-Seob Kim,&nbsp;Ahran Pae\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triple-scan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were significantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and milling method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"37-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价二硅酸锂冠在不同部位的边缘配合和内部配合。材料与方法:制备上颌左第一磨牙,扫描二硅酸锂冠,制作主模具。按制作方法分为三组(n = 10):常规压模法组(C组);确定铸造和铣削方法的扫描(D组);口腔内扫描和磨铣法(组I)。采用三重扫描方案进行评估。在颊腭和中远端切片测量绝对边缘差(AMD)、边缘间隙(MG)、轴向内间隙(AI)和线角内间隙(LI)。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和事后Tukey HSD检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。结果:C组AMD值明显低于D、I组(P < 0.05)。C组MG值显著低于D组颊区、远端区及I组各区(P < 0.05)。D组颊、腭区的AI值显著低于D组的中、远端区以及C、I组的所有区域(P < 0.05)。C组的LI值显著低于D和I组(P < 0.05)。结论:三种方法均为临床可接受的方法,除了口腔内扫描铣削法的边缘拟合,处于临床可接受的拟合边缘。[J]计算机学报;2009;26(1):37- 39;doi: 10.3290 / j.ijcd.b3818305)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations fabricated by three different methods using the triple-scan protocol.

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations.

Materials and methods: A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triple-scan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were measured. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

Results: AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were significantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and milling method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Digital Manufacturing Methods on the Accuracy of Ceramic Crowns. Accuracy of imaging software usable in clinical settings for 3D rendering of tooth structures. Digital workflow in oral splint manufacturing. Deep learning for diagnostic charting on pediatric panoramic radiographs. Preformed customized healing abutments in a biologically oriented preparation technique procedure: a 3-year retrospective case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1