通过基于视频的教育工具弥合过敏反应管理中的知识差距。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ALLERGY Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1089/ped.2022.0152
Jumanah Karim, Sofianne Gabrielli, Bahar Torabi, Adam Byrne, Sarah De Schryver, Vanessa Gadoury-Lévesque, Reza Alizadehfar, Christine McCusker, Matthieu Vincent, Judy Morris, Jennifer Gerdts, Xun Zhang, Moshe Ben-Shoshan
{"title":"通过基于视频的教育工具弥合过敏反应管理中的知识差距。","authors":"Jumanah Karim,&nbsp;Sofianne Gabrielli,&nbsp;Bahar Torabi,&nbsp;Adam Byrne,&nbsp;Sarah De Schryver,&nbsp;Vanessa Gadoury-Lévesque,&nbsp;Reza Alizadehfar,&nbsp;Christine McCusker,&nbsp;Matthieu Vincent,&nbsp;Judy Morris,&nbsp;Jennifer Gerdts,&nbsp;Xun Zhang,&nbsp;Moshe Ben-Shoshan","doi":"10.1089/ped.2022.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We aimed to develop and test the effectiveness of an education tool to help pediatric patients and their families better understand anaphylaxis and its management, and to improve current knowledge and treatment guidelines adherence. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From June 2019 to May 2022, 128 pediatric patients with history of food-triggered anaphylaxis who presented to the allergy outpatient clinics at the study institution were recruited. Consenting families were asked to complete 6 questions related to the triggers, recognition, and management of anaphylaxis at the time of presentation to the clinic. Participants were shown a 5-min animated video on the causes, presentation, and management of anaphylaxis. At the end of the video, the participants were redirected to the same 6 questions to respond again. The scores were recorded in proportion of correct answers (minimum 0.0; maximum 1.0). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of the patients was 5.8 ± 4.5 years (range: 0.5-18.8 years). The majority were males (70 patients; 54.7%). The mean baseline prevideo education questionnaire score was 0.76 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0), whereas the mean follow-up score was 0.82 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0). This score difference of 0.06 was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There were no significant associations between change in scores and age or gender of the participants. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our video teaching method was successful in educating patients and their families to better understand anaphylaxis and its management at the moment of the clinical encounter. Retention of knowledge at long-term follow-up should be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54389,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology","volume":"35 4","pages":"153-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Anaphylaxis Management Through a Video-Based Educational Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Jumanah Karim,&nbsp;Sofianne Gabrielli,&nbsp;Bahar Torabi,&nbsp;Adam Byrne,&nbsp;Sarah De Schryver,&nbsp;Vanessa Gadoury-Lévesque,&nbsp;Reza Alizadehfar,&nbsp;Christine McCusker,&nbsp;Matthieu Vincent,&nbsp;Judy Morris,&nbsp;Jennifer Gerdts,&nbsp;Xun Zhang,&nbsp;Moshe Ben-Shoshan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ped.2022.0152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We aimed to develop and test the effectiveness of an education tool to help pediatric patients and their families better understand anaphylaxis and its management, and to improve current knowledge and treatment guidelines adherence. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From June 2019 to May 2022, 128 pediatric patients with history of food-triggered anaphylaxis who presented to the allergy outpatient clinics at the study institution were recruited. Consenting families were asked to complete 6 questions related to the triggers, recognition, and management of anaphylaxis at the time of presentation to the clinic. Participants were shown a 5-min animated video on the causes, presentation, and management of anaphylaxis. At the end of the video, the participants were redirected to the same 6 questions to respond again. The scores were recorded in proportion of correct answers (minimum 0.0; maximum 1.0). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age of the patients was 5.8 ± 4.5 years (range: 0.5-18.8 years). The majority were males (70 patients; 54.7%). The mean baseline prevideo education questionnaire score was 0.76 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0), whereas the mean follow-up score was 0.82 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0). This score difference of 0.06 was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There were no significant associations between change in scores and age or gender of the participants. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our video teaching method was successful in educating patients and their families to better understand anaphylaxis and its management at the moment of the clinical encounter. Retention of knowledge at long-term follow-up should be assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"153-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2022.0152\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2022.0152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:我们旨在开发和测试一种教育工具的有效性,以帮助儿科患者及其家属更好地了解过敏反应及其管理,并提高现有知识和治疗指南的依从性。方法:招募2019年6月至2022年5月在该研究机构过敏门诊就诊的128例有食物诱发性过敏史的儿科患者。同意的家庭被要求在到诊所就诊时完成6个与过敏反应的触发、识别和管理相关的问题。参与者观看了一段5分钟的动画视频,内容涉及过敏反应的原因、表现和管理。在视频的最后,参与者被要求再次回答同样的6个问题。分数以正确答案的比例记录(最小0.0;最大1.0)。结果:患者平均年龄为5.8±4.5岁(0.5 ~ 18.8岁)。男性居多(70例;54.7%)。平均基线视频前教育问卷得分为0.76±0.2(范围:0.3-1.0),平均随访得分为0.82±0.2(范围:0.3-1.0)。结论:我们的视频教学方法在临床遇到过敏反应的瞬间,成功地教育了患者及其家属更好地了解过敏反应及其管理。应评估长期随访中知识的保留情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Anaphylaxis Management Through a Video-Based Educational Tool.

Introduction: We aimed to develop and test the effectiveness of an education tool to help pediatric patients and their families better understand anaphylaxis and its management, and to improve current knowledge and treatment guidelines adherence. Methods: From June 2019 to May 2022, 128 pediatric patients with history of food-triggered anaphylaxis who presented to the allergy outpatient clinics at the study institution were recruited. Consenting families were asked to complete 6 questions related to the triggers, recognition, and management of anaphylaxis at the time of presentation to the clinic. Participants were shown a 5-min animated video on the causes, presentation, and management of anaphylaxis. At the end of the video, the participants were redirected to the same 6 questions to respond again. The scores were recorded in proportion of correct answers (minimum 0.0; maximum 1.0). Results: The mean age of the patients was 5.8 ± 4.5 years (range: 0.5-18.8 years). The majority were males (70 patients; 54.7%). The mean baseline prevideo education questionnaire score was 0.76 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0), whereas the mean follow-up score was 0.82 ± 0.2 (range: 0.3-1.0). This score difference of 0.06 was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There were no significant associations between change in scores and age or gender of the participants. Conclusion: Our video teaching method was successful in educating patients and their families to better understand anaphylaxis and its management at the moment of the clinical encounter. Retention of knowledge at long-term follow-up should be assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology is a peer-reviewed journal designed to promote understanding and advance the treatment of respiratory, allergic, and immunologic diseases in children. The Journal delivers original translational, clinical, and epidemiologic research on the most common chronic illnesses of children—asthma and allergies—as well as many less common and rare diseases. It emphasizes the developmental implications of the morphological, physiological, pharmacological, and sociological components of these problems, as well as the impact of disease processes on families. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology coverage includes: -Functional and genetic immune deficiencies- Interstitial lung diseases- Both common and rare respiratory, allergic, and immunologic diseases- Patient care- Patient education research- Public health policy- International health studies
期刊最新文献
Hypogammaglobulinemia in a Child with Clericuzio-Type Poikiloderma with Neutropenia. Systemic Immune Inflammation Index, Systemic Inflammation Response Index, Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation, and Follistatin-Like Protein-1 Levels in Children Diagnosed with Pneumonia. Considerations for an Academic Pediatric Asthma Specialist in the 3rd Decade of the 21st Century. Iron Deficiency in Preschool Children with Chronic Rhinitis. Incorporating Aeroallergen Exposure Metrics into Clinical Asthma Care: A Pilot Study Using A Mixed-Methods Survey to Assess Aeroallergen Knowledge, Perceived Asthma Control, and Mitigation Strategies in Households of Children with Asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1