联络SARS-CoV-2抗原测定与RT-PCR在欧微米波中的性能比较

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1556/030.2022.01863
Neslihan Arici, Nilgün Kansak, Tuğçe Şentürk, Kürşat Baydili, Sebahat Aksaray
{"title":"联络SARS-CoV-2抗原测定与RT-PCR在欧微米波中的性能比较","authors":"Neslihan Arici,&nbsp;Nilgün Kansak,&nbsp;Tuğçe Şentürk,&nbsp;Kürşat Baydili,&nbsp;Sebahat Aksaray","doi":"10.1556/030.2022.01863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the newly emerging Omicron variant, there is a need to re-evaluate the performance of automated antigen tests. Our study aim was to evaluate the performance of the automated Liaison SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay against reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in samples with Omicron variant.A prospective study was performed on 373 combined oro-nasopharyngeal samples (NPS) randomly collected from symptomatic patients. NPS were tested with Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (DiaSorin, Italy) and DS Coronex COVID-19 Multiplex RT-PCR Diagnosis Kit (DS BioTechnology, Ankara, Turkey).Of 373 samples, 124 (33.2%) were found to be RT-PCR positive and 249 (66.8%) RT-PCR negative. Taking RT-PCR as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay were found as 84.6% (95%CI 77.3%-90%) and 100% (95%CI 98.5%-100%), respectively. For samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) value <25 (high viral load), the sensitivity increased to 100%. When antigen concentration and Ct values were compared, a strong negative correlation between antigen and Ct values was determined (P < 0.001).The Liaison antigen test met the performance criteria recommended by the WHO for samples with the Omicron variant. In addition, it showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in patients with high viral load. Therefore, Liaison antigen test can be a reliable and useful alternative in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in resource-constrained laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":7119,"journal":{"name":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","volume":"70 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of performance of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay with RT-PCR during the Omicron wave.\",\"authors\":\"Neslihan Arici,&nbsp;Nilgün Kansak,&nbsp;Tuğçe Şentürk,&nbsp;Kürşat Baydili,&nbsp;Sebahat Aksaray\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/030.2022.01863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to the newly emerging Omicron variant, there is a need to re-evaluate the performance of automated antigen tests. Our study aim was to evaluate the performance of the automated Liaison SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay against reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in samples with Omicron variant.A prospective study was performed on 373 combined oro-nasopharyngeal samples (NPS) randomly collected from symptomatic patients. NPS were tested with Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (DiaSorin, Italy) and DS Coronex COVID-19 Multiplex RT-PCR Diagnosis Kit (DS BioTechnology, Ankara, Turkey).Of 373 samples, 124 (33.2%) were found to be RT-PCR positive and 249 (66.8%) RT-PCR negative. Taking RT-PCR as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay were found as 84.6% (95%CI 77.3%-90%) and 100% (95%CI 98.5%-100%), respectively. For samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) value <25 (high viral load), the sensitivity increased to 100%. When antigen concentration and Ct values were compared, a strong negative correlation between antigen and Ct values was determined (P < 0.001).The Liaison antigen test met the performance criteria recommended by the WHO for samples with the Omicron variant. In addition, it showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in patients with high viral load. Therefore, Liaison antigen test can be a reliable and useful alternative in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in resource-constrained laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2022.01863\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2022.01863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于新出现的欧米克隆变异,有必要重新评估自动抗原检测的性能。我们的研究目的是评估自动联络SARS-CoV-2抗原测定在具有Omicron变异的样品中抗逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的性能。前瞻性研究随机从有症状的患者中抽取373例口鼻咽联合样本(NPS)。采用联络SARS-CoV-2抗原检测试剂盒(意大利DiaSorin)和DS Coronex COVID-19多重RT-PCR诊断试剂盒(DS BioTechnology,土耳其安卡拉)对NPS进行检测。373份样本中,124份(33.2%)呈RT-PCR阳性,249份(66.8%)呈RT-PCR阴性。以RT-PCR为参照,联络SARS-CoV-2抗原检测的灵敏度为84.6% (95%CI 77.3% ~ 90%),特异性为100% (95%CI 98.5% ~ 100%)。对于具有周期阈值(Ct)值的样本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of performance of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay with RT-PCR during the Omicron wave.

Due to the newly emerging Omicron variant, there is a need to re-evaluate the performance of automated antigen tests. Our study aim was to evaluate the performance of the automated Liaison SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay against reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in samples with Omicron variant.A prospective study was performed on 373 combined oro-nasopharyngeal samples (NPS) randomly collected from symptomatic patients. NPS were tested with Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag test (DiaSorin, Italy) and DS Coronex COVID-19 Multiplex RT-PCR Diagnosis Kit (DS BioTechnology, Ankara, Turkey).Of 373 samples, 124 (33.2%) were found to be RT-PCR positive and 249 (66.8%) RT-PCR negative. Taking RT-PCR as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay were found as 84.6% (95%CI 77.3%-90%) and 100% (95%CI 98.5%-100%), respectively. For samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) value <25 (high viral load), the sensitivity increased to 100%. When antigen concentration and Ct values were compared, a strong negative correlation between antigen and Ct values was determined (P < 0.001).The Liaison antigen test met the performance criteria recommended by the WHO for samples with the Omicron variant. In addition, it showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in patients with high viral load. Therefore, Liaison antigen test can be a reliable and useful alternative in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in resource-constrained laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AMIH is devoted to the publication of research in all fields of medical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, parasitology, mycology); immunology of infectious diseases and study of the microbiome related to human diseases.
期刊最新文献
T2Bacteria panel used simultaneously with blood cultures helps to determine the etiology of bloodstream infections. Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile PCR ribotype 181 after the COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Greece. HCV genotype distribution in Istanbul: A detailed 7 year epidemiological overview and impact of Covid-19 pandemic. Detection of KPC-3 producing Escherichia coli ST410 in Volos, Greece. Antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli strains in healthy pets from Tamaulipas, Mexico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1