种植体-基台连接方式对种植体边缘骨流失及存活的长期影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5051/jpis.2200960048
Young-Min Kim, Jong-Bin Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Beom-Seok Chang, Jae-Kwan Lee
{"title":"种植体-基台连接方式对种植体边缘骨流失及存活的长期影响。","authors":"Young-Min Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Bin Lee,&nbsp;Heung-Sik Um,&nbsp;Beom-Seok Chang,&nbsp;Jae-Kwan Lee","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2200960048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (<i>P</i>=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (<i>P</i><0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (<i>P=</i>0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, <i>P</i>=0.018), smoking status (heavy, <i>P</i>=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, <i>P</i>=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (<i>P</i>=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/de/jpis-52-496.PMC9807847.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Min Kim,&nbsp;Jong-Bin Lee,&nbsp;Heung-Sik Um,&nbsp;Beom-Seok Chang,&nbsp;Jae-Kwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5051/jpis.2200960048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (<i>P</i>=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (<i>P</i><0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (<i>P=</i>0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, <i>P</i>=0.018), smoking status (heavy, <i>P</i>=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, <i>P</i>=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (<i>P</i>=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/de/jpis-52-496.PMC9807847.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200960048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200960048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较不同种植体-基牙连接方式的长期存活率和种植体周围边缘骨流失情况。方法:对2011年11月~ 2015年12月在江陵原州大学口腔医院安装的种植体进行回顾性分析,随访5年以上。评估>5年的累积生存率,并在功能负荷后的1年和5年随访检查中评估种植体周围边缘骨丢失。结果:外接型和内接型的8年累积生存率分别为93.3%和90.7% (P=0.353)。5年后边缘骨丢失平均值为1.23 mm(外)和0.72 mm(内)(PP=0.137)。种植体长度(较长,P=0.018)、吸烟状况(重度,P=0.001)和假体类型(桥体,P=0.004)与更大的边缘骨丢失相关,而使用螺钉水泥保留假体与更小的边缘骨丢失显著相关(P=0.027)。结论:内、外基牙种植体的累积成活率无显著性差异。加载1年后,外基台连接种植体周围边缘骨丢失更大。然而,5年后,外部连接组和内部连接组之间没有明显差异。两种类型的基台连接是重建部分无牙脊的可行治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.

Methods: Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.

Results: The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (P=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (P<0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (P=0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, P=0.018), smoking status (heavy, P=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, P=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (P=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
期刊最新文献
Association between dietary quality and the prevalence of periodontitis in older Korean adults aged 60 or over. Comparison of early wound healing using modified papilla preservation technique between enamel matrix derivative and recombinant human fibroblast growth factor. Effects of adjacent periodontitis on osseointegrated dental implants. Is drug use associated with the presence of periodontitis and oral lesions? A meta-analysis. Clinical evaluation of root coverage in Miller class III/RT2 labial gingival recession treated with interdisciplinary periodontal-orthodontic therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1