如何设计病毒遏制策略?2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下的经济和流行病动态联合分析。

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s11403-022-00369-2
Alessandro Basurto, Herbert Dawid, Philipp Harting, Jasper Hepp, Dirk Kohlweyer
{"title":"如何设计病毒遏制策略?2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下的经济和流行病动态联合分析。","authors":"Alessandro Basurto,&nbsp;Herbert Dawid,&nbsp;Philipp Harting,&nbsp;Jasper Hepp,&nbsp;Dirk Kohlweyer","doi":"10.1007/s11403-022-00369-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyze the impact of different designs of COVID-19-related lockdown policies on economic loss and mortality using a micro-level simulation model, which combines a multi-sectoral closed economy with an epidemic transmission model. In particular, the model captures explicitly the (stochastic) effect of interactions between heterogeneous agents during different economic activities on virus transmissions. The empirical validity of the model is established using data on economic and pandemic dynamics in Germany in the first 6 months after the COVID-19 outbreak. We show that a policy-inducing switch between a strict lockdown and a full opening-up of economic activity based on a high incidence threshold is strictly dominated by alternative policies, which are based on a low incidence threshold combined with a light lockdown with weak restrictions of economic activity or even a continuous weak lockdown. Furthermore, also the ex ante variance of the economic loss suffered during the pandemic is substantially lower under these policies. Keeping the other policy parameters fixed, a variation of the consumption restrictions during the lockdown induces a trade-off between GDP loss and mortality. Furthermore, we study the robustness of these findings with respect to alternative pandemic scenarios and examine the optimal timing of lifting containment measures in light of a vaccination rollout in the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":45479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination","volume":"18 2","pages":"311-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614772/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to design virus containment policies? A joint analysis of economic and epidemic dynamics under the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Basurto,&nbsp;Herbert Dawid,&nbsp;Philipp Harting,&nbsp;Jasper Hepp,&nbsp;Dirk Kohlweyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11403-022-00369-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We analyze the impact of different designs of COVID-19-related lockdown policies on economic loss and mortality using a micro-level simulation model, which combines a multi-sectoral closed economy with an epidemic transmission model. In particular, the model captures explicitly the (stochastic) effect of interactions between heterogeneous agents during different economic activities on virus transmissions. The empirical validity of the model is established using data on economic and pandemic dynamics in Germany in the first 6 months after the COVID-19 outbreak. We show that a policy-inducing switch between a strict lockdown and a full opening-up of economic activity based on a high incidence threshold is strictly dominated by alternative policies, which are based on a low incidence threshold combined with a light lockdown with weak restrictions of economic activity or even a continuous weak lockdown. Furthermore, also the ex ante variance of the economic loss suffered during the pandemic is substantially lower under these policies. Keeping the other policy parameters fixed, a variation of the consumption restrictions during the lockdown induces a trade-off between GDP loss and mortality. Furthermore, we study the robustness of these findings with respect to alternative pandemic scenarios and examine the optimal timing of lifting containment measures in light of a vaccination rollout in the population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"311-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614772/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-022-00369-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-022-00369-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

采用多部门封闭经济与疫情传播模型相结合的微观模拟模型,分析不同疫情防控政策设计对经济损失和死亡率的影响。特别是,该模型明确地捕捉了不同经济活动中异质因子之间相互作用对病毒传播的(随机)影响。利用新冠肺炎疫情爆发后前6个月德国的经济和疫情动态数据,建立了该模型的实证有效性。研究表明,基于高发生率阈值的严格封锁与经济活动全面开放之间的政策诱导转换,严格由基于低发生率阈值与弱经济活动限制的轻封锁相结合甚至持续弱封锁的替代政策主导。此外,根据这些政策,大流行病期间遭受的经济损失的事前差异也大大降低。在保持其他政策参数不变的情况下,封锁期间消费限制的变化会导致GDP损失和死亡率之间的权衡。此外,我们研究了这些发现相对于其他大流行情景的稳健性,并研究了在人群中接种疫苗的情况下解除控制措施的最佳时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to design virus containment policies? A joint analysis of economic and epidemic dynamics under the COVID-19 pandemic.

We analyze the impact of different designs of COVID-19-related lockdown policies on economic loss and mortality using a micro-level simulation model, which combines a multi-sectoral closed economy with an epidemic transmission model. In particular, the model captures explicitly the (stochastic) effect of interactions between heterogeneous agents during different economic activities on virus transmissions. The empirical validity of the model is established using data on economic and pandemic dynamics in Germany in the first 6 months after the COVID-19 outbreak. We show that a policy-inducing switch between a strict lockdown and a full opening-up of economic activity based on a high incidence threshold is strictly dominated by alternative policies, which are based on a low incidence threshold combined with a light lockdown with weak restrictions of economic activity or even a continuous weak lockdown. Furthermore, also the ex ante variance of the economic loss suffered during the pandemic is substantially lower under these policies. Keeping the other policy parameters fixed, a variation of the consumption restrictions during the lockdown induces a trade-off between GDP loss and mortality. Furthermore, we study the robustness of these findings with respect to alternative pandemic scenarios and examine the optimal timing of lifting containment measures in light of a vaccination rollout in the population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination addresses the vibrant and interdisciplinary field of agent-based approaches to economics and social sciences. It focuses on simulating and synthesizing emergent phenomena and collective behavior in order to understand economic and social systems. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, the following: markets as complex adaptive systems, multi-agents in economics, artificial markets with heterogeneous agents, financial markets with heterogeneous agents, theory and simulation of agent-based models, adaptive agents with artificial intelligence, interacting particle systems in economics, social and complex networks, econophysics, non-linear economic dynamics, evolutionary games, market mechanisms in distributed computing systems, experimental economics, collective decisions. Contributions are mostly from economics, physics, computer science and related fields and are typically based on sound theoretical models and supported by experimental validation. Survey papers are also welcome. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination is the official journal of the Association of Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Officially cited as: J Econ Interact Coord
期刊最新文献
Mesoscopic structure of the stock market and portfolio optimization Introduction to the special issue on two editions of the workshop on economic science with heterogeneous interacting agents, $$24.5{\text {th}}$$ Milan, 2021 (wehia 2021) $$25{\text {th}}$$ Catania, 2022 (wehia 2022) Project finance or corporate finance for renewable energy? an agent-based insight From zero-intelligence to Bayesian learning: the effect of rationality on market efficiency Nonlinear dynamics in a public good game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1