晚期、复发或转移性唾液腺癌两种化疗方案的比较。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_1226_20
Ahmad Ameri, Ainaz Sourati, Behnaz Behzadi, Mansour Lesan, Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary
{"title":"晚期、复发或转移性唾液腺癌两种化疗方案的比较。","authors":"Ahmad Ameri,&nbsp;Ainaz Sourati,&nbsp;Behnaz Behzadi,&nbsp;Mansour Lesan,&nbsp;Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary","doi":"10.4103/ijc.IJC_1226_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of chemotherapy in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (LA-R/M SGCs) is still undefined. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two chemotherapy regimens in LA-R/M SGC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study compared paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (TC) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin (CAP) regimen in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2011 and April 2019, 48 patients with LA-R/M SGCs were recruited. The ORRs of first-line TC and CAP regimens were 54.2% and 36.3%, respectively (P = 0.57). The ORRs in recurrent and de novo metastatic patients were 50.0% and 37.5% for TC and CAP, respectively (P = 0.26). The median PFS of TC and CAP arms were 10.2 and 11.9 months, respectively (P = 0.91). In the subanalysis, patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had longer PFS in the TC arm (14.5 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.03), irrespective of the tumor grade (low grade: 16.3 vs. 8.9 months, high grade: 11.7 vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.03). The median OS rates were 45.5 and 19.5 months for TC and CAP groups, respectively (P = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with LA-R/M SGC, there was no significant difference between first-line TC and CAP in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Ameri,&nbsp;Ainaz Sourati,&nbsp;Behnaz Behzadi,&nbsp;Mansour Lesan,&nbsp;Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijc.IJC_1226_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of chemotherapy in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (LA-R/M SGCs) is still undefined. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two chemotherapy regimens in LA-R/M SGC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study compared paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (TC) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin (CAP) regimen in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2011 and April 2019, 48 patients with LA-R/M SGCs were recruited. The ORRs of first-line TC and CAP regimens were 54.2% and 36.3%, respectively (P = 0.57). The ORRs in recurrent and de novo metastatic patients were 50.0% and 37.5% for TC and CAP, respectively (P = 0.26). The median PFS of TC and CAP arms were 10.2 and 11.9 months, respectively (P = 0.91). In the subanalysis, patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had longer PFS in the TC arm (14.5 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.03), irrespective of the tumor grade (low grade: 16.3 vs. 8.9 months, high grade: 11.7 vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.03). The median OS rates were 45.5 and 19.5 months for TC and CAP groups, respectively (P = 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with LA-R/M SGC, there was no significant difference between first-line TC and CAP in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_1226_20\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_1226_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:化疗对局部晚期、复发和转移性唾液腺癌(LA-R/M-SGC)的疗效尚不明确。我们旨在比较两种化疗方案对LA-R/M SGC的疗效。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究比较了紫杉醇(紫杉醇)加卡铂(TC)与环磷酰胺、阿霉素加顺铂(CAP)方案在总有效率(ORR)、临床获益率(CBR)、无进展生存率(PFS),结果:2011年10月至2019年4月,招募了48名LA-R/M SGCs患者。一线TC和CAP方案的ORR分别为54.2%和36.3%(P=0.57)。复发和新发转移患者的TC和CAP的ORRs分别为50.0%和37.5%(P=0.26)。TC和CAP组的中位PFS分别为10.2和11.9个月(P=0.91),腺样囊性癌(ACC)患者在TC组的PFS较长(14.5个月vs.8.2个月,P=0.03),与肿瘤分级无关(低分级:16.3个月vs.8.9个月,高分级:11.7个月-4.5个月;P=0.03)。TC组和CAP组的中位OS率分别为45.5和19.5个月(P=0.71)。结论:对于LA-R/M SGC患者,一线TC和CAP在ORR、PFS和OS方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma.

Background: The efficacy of chemotherapy in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (LA-R/M SGCs) is still undefined. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two chemotherapy regimens in LA-R/M SGC.

Materials and methods: This prospective study compared paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (TC) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin (CAP) regimen in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Between October 2011 and April 2019, 48 patients with LA-R/M SGCs were recruited. The ORRs of first-line TC and CAP regimens were 54.2% and 36.3%, respectively (P = 0.57). The ORRs in recurrent and de novo metastatic patients were 50.0% and 37.5% for TC and CAP, respectively (P = 0.26). The median PFS of TC and CAP arms were 10.2 and 11.9 months, respectively (P = 0.91). In the subanalysis, patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had longer PFS in the TC arm (14.5 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.03), irrespective of the tumor grade (low grade: 16.3 vs. 8.9 months, high grade: 11.7 vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.03). The median OS rates were 45.5 and 19.5 months for TC and CAP groups, respectively (P = 0.71).

Conclusion: For patients with LA-R/M SGC, there was no significant difference between first-line TC and CAP in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients visiting the Palliative Care outpatient department in a tertiary care oncology centre in India. Introduction of HPV vaccine in universal immunization programme of India: A step in the right direction for the elimination of cervical cancer. Role of adaptive radiotherapy during concomitant chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of T-DM1 in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer Is there a role of cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors? An Indian cancer center experience with review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1