{"title":"指标重要吗?","authors":"Jacqueline Sachse","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific search engines enrich result lists with indicators of scientific quality, such as citation counts, in order to enhance user experience and improve performance. This dissertation project aims to study the effect of such integration of impact indicators in search result pages on relevance evaluation, considering both traditional citation-based and altmetric measures. The user behavior is analyzed with a combination of eye-tracking and think-aloud as well as a questionnaire. This paper describes the methodology of an experimental study designed to answer the question if the visibility of metrics alters the behavior during scientific literature search and if behavior varies depending on the kind of metric, specifically citation rate and altmetric score.","PeriodicalId":187771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Metrics Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Sachse\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3295750.3298973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific search engines enrich result lists with indicators of scientific quality, such as citation counts, in order to enhance user experience and improve performance. This dissertation project aims to study the effect of such integration of impact indicators in search result pages on relevance evaluation, considering both traditional citation-based and altmetric measures. The user behavior is analyzed with a combination of eye-tracking and think-aloud as well as a questionnaire. This paper describes the methodology of an experimental study designed to answer the question if the visibility of metrics alters the behavior during scientific literature search and if behavior varies depending on the kind of metric, specifically citation rate and altmetric score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

科学搜索引擎通过引用数等科学质量指标丰富结果列表,以增强用户体验,提高性能。本论文项目旨在研究搜索结果页面中影响力指标的整合对相关性评估的影响,同时考虑传统的基于引用的度量和替代度量。用户行为分析结合了眼动追踪和有声思考以及问卷调查。本文描述了一项实验研究的方法,旨在回答这样一个问题:指标的可见性是否会改变科学文献检索中的行为,以及行为是否会因指标的类型而变化,特别是引用率和替代指标得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Metrics Matter?
Scientific search engines enrich result lists with indicators of scientific quality, such as citation counts, in order to enhance user experience and improve performance. This dissertation project aims to study the effect of such integration of impact indicators in search result pages on relevance evaluation, considering both traditional citation-based and altmetric measures. The user behavior is analyzed with a combination of eye-tracking and think-aloud as well as a questionnaire. This paper describes the methodology of an experimental study designed to answer the question if the visibility of metrics alters the behavior during scientific literature search and if behavior varies depending on the kind of metric, specifically citation rate and altmetric score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assisting Health Consumers While Searching the Web through Medical Annotations Do Metrics Matter? Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities NotifyMeHere: Intelligent Notification Delivery in Multi-Device Environments Computational Surprise, Perceptual Surprise, and Personal Background in Text Understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1