{"title":"Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Divission (STAD) Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di SMPN 46 Sijunjung","authors":"D. Yuli, Rivdya Eliza","doi":"10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper study about the interest and the low mathematics learning outcomes of eighth grade students of SMP N 46 Sijunjung in the school year 2017/2018. The aimsof this research are to know:1) the interest of student learning taught by the STAD cooperative learning model, 2) Mathematics learning outcomes from students that taught with the STAD type cooperative model in class VIII SMP N 46 Sijunjung 2017/2018 school year. This research is an experimental research and uses quantitative research methods. The subjects of this study were all eighth grade students of SMP N 46 Sijunjung. The sample taken by purposive sampling technique. The results showed that 1) the interest in mathematics learning of students taught with STAD was categorized as good with a percentage of 84.50% and 2) the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with the STAD type cooperative model were higher than the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with conventional learning models. It can be seen from the acquisition of the average value of the experimental class test 81.50 and the average value of the control class test 72.25. The percentage of student learning completeness in the experimental class was 70%, while in the control class 40%. After testing the hypothesis using the t-test, obtained t count> t table (2.68> 1.68) with αi = i0.05 at the 95% confidence interval, then the decision is H0 rejected and H1 accepted.","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"28 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本研究调查了2017/2018学年四中中学八年级学生的数学学习兴趣和数学学习成绩的差异。本研究的目的是了解:1)STAD合作学习模式下学生的学习兴趣;2)2017/2018学年SMP N 46小学八班采用STAD合作学习模式教学的学生的数学学习成果。本研究为实验研究,采用定量研究方法。本研究的研究对象均为四中中学八年级学生。有目的抽样法所取的样本。结果表明:1)采用STAD合作模式教学的学生对数学学习的兴趣为良好,占84.50%;2)采用STAD合作模式教学的学生的数学学习成果高于采用传统合作模式教学的学生的数学学习成果。可以看出,实验班测试的平均值为81.50,对照组测试的平均值为72.25。实验班学生学习完成率为70%,对照组为40%。采用t检验对假设进行检验,得到t count> t表(2.68> 1.68),在95%置信区间αi = i0.05,则决定拒绝H0,接受H1。
Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Divission (STAD) Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di SMPN 46 Sijunjung
This paper study about the interest and the low mathematics learning outcomes of eighth grade students of SMP N 46 Sijunjung in the school year 2017/2018. The aimsof this research are to know:1) the interest of student learning taught by the STAD cooperative learning model, 2) Mathematics learning outcomes from students that taught with the STAD type cooperative model in class VIII SMP N 46 Sijunjung 2017/2018 school year. This research is an experimental research and uses quantitative research methods. The subjects of this study were all eighth grade students of SMP N 46 Sijunjung. The sample taken by purposive sampling technique. The results showed that 1) the interest in mathematics learning of students taught with STAD was categorized as good with a percentage of 84.50% and 2) the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with the STAD type cooperative model were higher than the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with conventional learning models. It can be seen from the acquisition of the average value of the experimental class test 81.50 and the average value of the control class test 72.25. The percentage of student learning completeness in the experimental class was 70%, while in the control class 40%. After testing the hypothesis using the t-test, obtained t count> t table (2.68> 1.68) with αi = i0.05 at the 95% confidence interval, then the decision is H0 rejected and H1 accepted.