二元供应链效率:一个考虑成员权力关系和决策者偏好的新理论框架

Walid Abdelfattah, A. Rebai
{"title":"二元供应链效率:一个考虑成员权力关系和决策者偏好的新理论框架","authors":"Walid Abdelfattah, A. Rebai","doi":"10.1109/ICMSAO.2013.6552581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last ten years many works have appeared dealing with the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for the assessment of supply chains efficiency. However, when analyzing especially theoretical basis of some of these works we found some issues which could be considered or reconsidered. This paper aims to offer a theoretical framework proposing new perspectives to treat these issues in supply chains technical efficiency measurement. Focusing on dyadic chains (composed only by two members), the purpose herein is firstly the distinction between cooperation and dominance when measuring chains and chains members efficiency and secondly the incorporation of decision makers preferences that could be assigned to these chains and chains members. The proposed perspectives will help to looking for appropriate DEA models in order to provide more realistic performance evaluation of supply chains.","PeriodicalId":339666,"journal":{"name":"2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO)","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dyadic supply chains efficiency: A new theoretical framework to consider members power relationship and decision makers preferences\",\"authors\":\"Walid Abdelfattah, A. Rebai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSAO.2013.6552581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last ten years many works have appeared dealing with the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for the assessment of supply chains efficiency. However, when analyzing especially theoretical basis of some of these works we found some issues which could be considered or reconsidered. This paper aims to offer a theoretical framework proposing new perspectives to treat these issues in supply chains technical efficiency measurement. Focusing on dyadic chains (composed only by two members), the purpose herein is firstly the distinction between cooperation and dominance when measuring chains and chains members efficiency and secondly the incorporation of decision makers preferences that could be assigned to these chains and chains members. The proposed perspectives will help to looking for appropriate DEA models in order to provide more realistic performance evaluation of supply chains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO)\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSAO.2013.6552581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 5th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSAO.2013.6552581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的十年中,出现了许多关于使用数据包络分析(DEA)来评估供应链效率的工作。然而,在分析其中一些作品的理论基础时,我们发现了一些值得思考或重新思考的问题。本文旨在提供一个理论框架,提出新的视角来处理供应链技术效率测量中的这些问题。本文关注的是二元链(仅由两个成员组成),目的首先是在衡量链和链成员效率时区分合作和优势,其次是纳入决策者可分配给这些链和链成员的偏好。提出的观点将有助于寻找合适的DEA模型,以提供更现实的供应链绩效评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dyadic supply chains efficiency: A new theoretical framework to consider members power relationship and decision makers preferences
During the last ten years many works have appeared dealing with the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for the assessment of supply chains efficiency. However, when analyzing especially theoretical basis of some of these works we found some issues which could be considered or reconsidered. This paper aims to offer a theoretical framework proposing new perspectives to treat these issues in supply chains technical efficiency measurement. Focusing on dyadic chains (composed only by two members), the purpose herein is firstly the distinction between cooperation and dominance when measuring chains and chains members efficiency and secondly the incorporation of decision makers preferences that could be assigned to these chains and chains members. The proposed perspectives will help to looking for appropriate DEA models in order to provide more realistic performance evaluation of supply chains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Existence and uniqueness of the inversion of a generalized Radon transform Mixture periodic GARCH models: Applications to exchange rate modeling A PSO algorithm for economic scheduling of power system incorporating wind based generation Arnoldi model reduction for switched linear systems An iterated greedy heuristic for the static empty vehicle redistribution problem for the Personal Rapid Transit system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1