多层次扫描电镜的新应用:教学质量在干预与学生成绩之间的中介作用

Ran Tian, E. Stojanovski, Drew Miller
{"title":"多层次扫描电镜的新应用:教学质量在干预与学生成绩之间的中介作用","authors":"Ran Tian, E. Stojanovski, Drew Miller","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.tian126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Improving teaching quality has been an ongoing pursuit for policymakers, researchers and broader government agencies and organisations. Professional development (PD) initiatives directed at teachers are a recognised strategy for improving teaching quality, with the underlying intention to support improved student achievement. Yet there is limited evidence of the actual impact of PD directed at teachers on student learning outcomes. Quality Teaching Rounds (QTR), a well-recognised form of collaborative PD in Australia, is one of few approaches to provide evidence of impact on teaching quality and student outcomes. Through multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), a statistically significant positive impact of QTR PD has been demonstrated on teaching practices and student outcomes. A further question that remains is whether the change in teaching quality through involvement in QTR PD improves student achievement. This underlying mechanism is yet to be explored in the QTR PD framework and has rarely been explored in PD settings internationally due to limited data that often prevents suitable statistical techniques to be employed. A clustered RCT investigating the impact of QTR PD on teaching quality and student achievement was conducted in 2019, involving 133 government primary schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Data were collected from 222 teachers and 5146 students in Stage 2 (years 3-4) in Term 1 and these teachers and students were followed up in Term 4 of the same year. Teaching practices were observed and rated in the classroom using a pedagogical model, the Quality Teaching (QT) model, which contains 18 observable elements within three dimensions of teaching practice (Intellectual Quality, Quality Learning Environment and Significance), while students were assessed using the Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) in mathematics, which was measured using the scaled scores on 40 multiple choice questions. The data structure therefore comprised a combination of multilevel and longitudinal features along with latent constructs and multiple intervention groups (QTR vs wait-list control) that were being compared. This paper examines the underlying interconnected relationships between PD, teaching quality and student achievement by testing the hypothesis that the impacts of the QTR intervention on student achievement in mathematics was mediated by teaching quality. Multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) with 2-2-1 design is investigated for these data. Student PAT scores in mathematics were significantly higher, on average (0.11SD [95% CI = 0.01,0.20]) in the intervention group (QTR) compared to those in the control group for the Intellectual Quality (IQ) dimension of the QT model. This demonstrates the statistically significant mediation effect of Intellectual Quality (IQ) on student learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel application of multilevel SEM: Teaching quality as mediator between intervention and student achievement\",\"authors\":\"Ran Tian, E. Stojanovski, Drew Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.36334/modsim.2023.tian126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Improving teaching quality has been an ongoing pursuit for policymakers, researchers and broader government agencies and organisations. Professional development (PD) initiatives directed at teachers are a recognised strategy for improving teaching quality, with the underlying intention to support improved student achievement. Yet there is limited evidence of the actual impact of PD directed at teachers on student learning outcomes. Quality Teaching Rounds (QTR), a well-recognised form of collaborative PD in Australia, is one of few approaches to provide evidence of impact on teaching quality and student outcomes. Through multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), a statistically significant positive impact of QTR PD has been demonstrated on teaching practices and student outcomes. A further question that remains is whether the change in teaching quality through involvement in QTR PD improves student achievement. This underlying mechanism is yet to be explored in the QTR PD framework and has rarely been explored in PD settings internationally due to limited data that often prevents suitable statistical techniques to be employed. A clustered RCT investigating the impact of QTR PD on teaching quality and student achievement was conducted in 2019, involving 133 government primary schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Data were collected from 222 teachers and 5146 students in Stage 2 (years 3-4) in Term 1 and these teachers and students were followed up in Term 4 of the same year. Teaching practices were observed and rated in the classroom using a pedagogical model, the Quality Teaching (QT) model, which contains 18 observable elements within three dimensions of teaching practice (Intellectual Quality, Quality Learning Environment and Significance), while students were assessed using the Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) in mathematics, which was measured using the scaled scores on 40 multiple choice questions. The data structure therefore comprised a combination of multilevel and longitudinal features along with latent constructs and multiple intervention groups (QTR vs wait-list control) that were being compared. This paper examines the underlying interconnected relationships between PD, teaching quality and student achievement by testing the hypothesis that the impacts of the QTR intervention on student achievement in mathematics was mediated by teaching quality. Multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) with 2-2-1 design is investigated for these data. Student PAT scores in mathematics were significantly higher, on average (0.11SD [95% CI = 0.01,0.20]) in the intervention group (QTR) compared to those in the control group for the Intellectual Quality (IQ) dimension of the QT model. This demonstrates the statistically significant mediation effect of Intellectual Quality (IQ) on student learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.tian126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.tian126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高教学质量一直是政策制定者、研究人员和更广泛的政府机构和组织的持续追求。针对教师的专业发展计划是一项公认的提高教学质量的策略,其根本目的是支持提高学生的成绩。然而,针对教师的PD对学生学习成果的实际影响的证据有限。质量教学轮次(QTR)是澳大利亚公认的合作PD形式,是提供对教学质量和学生成果影响证据的少数方法之一。通过多个随机对照试验(RCTs), QTR PD对教学实践和学生成绩有统计学上显著的积极影响。另一个问题是,通过参与QTR PD来改变教学质量是否能提高学生的成绩。这种潜在机制尚未在QTR PD框架中进行探索,并且由于数据有限,通常无法采用适当的统计技术,因此很少在国际PD设置中进行探索。2019年,在澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)的133所公立小学开展了一项调查QTR PD对教学质量和学生成绩影响的聚类随机对照试验。本研究收集了第一学期第二阶段(3-4年级)222名教师和5146名学生的数据,并在同年第四学期对这些教师和学生进行了随访。使用教学模型,即质量教学(QT)模型,在课堂上观察和评价教学实践,该模型包含教学实践三个维度(智力质量,优质学习环境和重要性)中的18个可观察元素,而使用数学进步成就测试(PAT)对学生进行评估,该测试使用40个选择题的缩放分数来衡量。因此,数据结构包括多层和纵向特征的组合,以及正在比较的潜在构念和多个干预组(QTR与等候名单对照)。本文通过检验QTR干预对学生数学成绩的影响是由教学质量中介的假设,来检验PD、教学质量和学生成绩之间潜在的相互关系。研究了基于2-2-1设计的多层结构方程模型(MSEM)。在QT模型的智力质量(IQ)维度上,干预组(QTR)学生的数学PAT分数显著高于对照组(平均0.11SD [95% CI = 0.01,0.20])。这表明智力质量(IQ)对学生学习成果的中介作用具有显著的统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel application of multilevel SEM: Teaching quality as mediator between intervention and student achievement
: Improving teaching quality has been an ongoing pursuit for policymakers, researchers and broader government agencies and organisations. Professional development (PD) initiatives directed at teachers are a recognised strategy for improving teaching quality, with the underlying intention to support improved student achievement. Yet there is limited evidence of the actual impact of PD directed at teachers on student learning outcomes. Quality Teaching Rounds (QTR), a well-recognised form of collaborative PD in Australia, is one of few approaches to provide evidence of impact on teaching quality and student outcomes. Through multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), a statistically significant positive impact of QTR PD has been demonstrated on teaching practices and student outcomes. A further question that remains is whether the change in teaching quality through involvement in QTR PD improves student achievement. This underlying mechanism is yet to be explored in the QTR PD framework and has rarely been explored in PD settings internationally due to limited data that often prevents suitable statistical techniques to be employed. A clustered RCT investigating the impact of QTR PD on teaching quality and student achievement was conducted in 2019, involving 133 government primary schools in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Data were collected from 222 teachers and 5146 students in Stage 2 (years 3-4) in Term 1 and these teachers and students were followed up in Term 4 of the same year. Teaching practices were observed and rated in the classroom using a pedagogical model, the Quality Teaching (QT) model, which contains 18 observable elements within three dimensions of teaching practice (Intellectual Quality, Quality Learning Environment and Significance), while students were assessed using the Progressive Achievement Test (PAT) in mathematics, which was measured using the scaled scores on 40 multiple choice questions. The data structure therefore comprised a combination of multilevel and longitudinal features along with latent constructs and multiple intervention groups (QTR vs wait-list control) that were being compared. This paper examines the underlying interconnected relationships between PD, teaching quality and student achievement by testing the hypothesis that the impacts of the QTR intervention on student achievement in mathematics was mediated by teaching quality. Multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) with 2-2-1 design is investigated for these data. Student PAT scores in mathematics were significantly higher, on average (0.11SD [95% CI = 0.01,0.20]) in the intervention group (QTR) compared to those in the control group for the Intellectual Quality (IQ) dimension of the QT model. This demonstrates the statistically significant mediation effect of Intellectual Quality (IQ) on student learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of the activated sludge process with a stratified settling unit Recent changes in the water and ecological condition at the arid Tarim River Basin A study on internal observation of vertical protective nets of temporary structures using image processing techniques Developing synthetic datasets for reef modelling Modelling hydrological impact of remotely sensed vegetation change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1