充分利用你的因子调查。展示和分析在受试者内部和受试者之间设计因子调查中收集的数据的替代方法

Peter Kotzian
{"title":"充分利用你的因子调查。展示和分析在受试者内部和受试者之间设计因子调查中收集的数据的替代方法","authors":"Peter Kotzian","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3493536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factorial surveys became an increasingly popular method in various disciplines of social research, ranging from psychology to sociology to behavioral economics. By combining elements of experiments and surveys, the method allows to study more complex relationships, combining experimental stimuli, personal features, and situational elements. There is a range of established statistical methods to analyze the data obtained from such studies, which focus on drivers of individual reactions to the vignette and its features. We offer and discuss alternative approaches, which allow for a different view on the information obtained from factorial surveys by focusing on the level of the vignette. These approaches allow to identify the latent dimensions underlying the multitude of situational facets chosen by the researcher when designing the vignette universe, to see which vignettes are actually similar to each other, regardless of their content, and to identify factors which structure the underlying space of the vignette universe, which may or may not correspond to the intentions underlying the construction of the vignette universe. Practical cases which construct an ethical space underlying a factorial survey from compliance and ethics research illustrate the alternative methods and their results.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Most Out of Your Factorial Survey. Alternative Methods for the Presenting and Analyzing Data Gathered in Within- and Between-Subjects Design Factorial Surveys\",\"authors\":\"Peter Kotzian\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3493536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Factorial surveys became an increasingly popular method in various disciplines of social research, ranging from psychology to sociology to behavioral economics. By combining elements of experiments and surveys, the method allows to study more complex relationships, combining experimental stimuli, personal features, and situational elements. There is a range of established statistical methods to analyze the data obtained from such studies, which focus on drivers of individual reactions to the vignette and its features. We offer and discuss alternative approaches, which allow for a different view on the information obtained from factorial surveys by focusing on the level of the vignette. These approaches allow to identify the latent dimensions underlying the multitude of situational facets chosen by the researcher when designing the vignette universe, to see which vignettes are actually similar to each other, regardless of their content, and to identify factors which structure the underlying space of the vignette universe, which may or may not correspond to the intentions underlying the construction of the vignette universe. Practical cases which construct an ethical space underlying a factorial survey from compliance and ethics research illustrate the alternative methods and their results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从心理学到社会学再到行为经济学,阶乘调查在社会研究的各个学科中越来越受欢迎。通过结合实验和调查的元素,该方法可以研究更复杂的关系,结合实验刺激、个人特征和情境因素。有一系列既定的统计方法来分析从这些研究中获得的数据,这些研究侧重于对小插曲及其特征的个人反应的驱动因素。我们提供并讨论了不同的方法,这些方法通过关注小插曲的水平,允许对从析因调查中获得的信息有不同的看法。这些方法可以识别研究者在设计小情节世界时所选择的众多情境因素背后的潜在维度,看看哪些小情节实际上彼此相似,而不管它们的内容如何,并识别构成小情节世界潜在空间的因素,这些因素可能符合或不符合小情节世界构建背后的意图。从依从性和伦理研究的析因调查中构建伦理空间的实际案例说明了替代方法及其结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making the Most Out of Your Factorial Survey. Alternative Methods for the Presenting and Analyzing Data Gathered in Within- and Between-Subjects Design Factorial Surveys
Factorial surveys became an increasingly popular method in various disciplines of social research, ranging from psychology to sociology to behavioral economics. By combining elements of experiments and surveys, the method allows to study more complex relationships, combining experimental stimuli, personal features, and situational elements. There is a range of established statistical methods to analyze the data obtained from such studies, which focus on drivers of individual reactions to the vignette and its features. We offer and discuss alternative approaches, which allow for a different view on the information obtained from factorial surveys by focusing on the level of the vignette. These approaches allow to identify the latent dimensions underlying the multitude of situational facets chosen by the researcher when designing the vignette universe, to see which vignettes are actually similar to each other, regardless of their content, and to identify factors which structure the underlying space of the vignette universe, which may or may not correspond to the intentions underlying the construction of the vignette universe. Practical cases which construct an ethical space underlying a factorial survey from compliance and ethics research illustrate the alternative methods and their results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The Eyes and Ears of the Agricultural Markets": A History of Information in Interwar Agricultural Economics Deepening and Widening Social Identity Analysis in Economics In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds Reports from China: Joan Robinson as Observer and Travel Writer, 1953-78 Introduction to a Symposium on Carl Menger on the Centenary of his Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1