用于可视化架构恢复的包模式

M. Lungu, Michele Lanza, Tudor Gîrba
{"title":"用于可视化架构恢复的包模式","authors":"M. Lungu, Michele Lanza, Tudor Gîrba","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2006.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recovering the architecture is the first step towards reengineering a software system. Many reverse engineering tools use top-down exploration as a way of providing a visual and interactive process for architecture recovery. During the exploration process, the user navigates through various views on the system by choosing from several exploration operations. Although some sequences of these operations lead to views which, from the architectural point of view, are mode relevant than others, current tools do not provide a way of predicting which exploration paths are worth taking and which are not. In this article, we propose a set of package patterns which are used for augmenting the exploration process with information about the worthiness of the various exploration paths. The patterns are defined based on the internal package structure and on the relationships between the package and the other packages in the system. To validate our approach, we verify the relevance of the proposed patterns for real-world systems by analyzing their frequency of occurrence in six open-source software projects","PeriodicalId":443362,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Package patterns for visual architecture recovery\",\"authors\":\"M. Lungu, Michele Lanza, Tudor Gîrba\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2006.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recovering the architecture is the first step towards reengineering a software system. Many reverse engineering tools use top-down exploration as a way of providing a visual and interactive process for architecture recovery. During the exploration process, the user navigates through various views on the system by choosing from several exploration operations. Although some sequences of these operations lead to views which, from the architectural point of view, are mode relevant than others, current tools do not provide a way of predicting which exploration paths are worth taking and which are not. In this article, we propose a set of package patterns which are used for augmenting the exploration process with information about the worthiness of the various exploration paths. The patterns are defined based on the internal package structure and on the relationships between the package and the other packages in the system. To validate our approach, we verify the relevance of the proposed patterns for real-world systems by analyzing their frequency of occurrence in six open-source software projects\",\"PeriodicalId\":443362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2006.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2006.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

恢复架构是重新设计软件系统的第一步。许多逆向工程工具使用自顶向下的探索作为一种为架构恢复提供可视化和交互式过程的方法。在勘探过程中,用户通过从几个勘探操作中进行选择来导航系统的各种视图。尽管从体系结构的角度来看,这些操作的一些序列导致的视图比其他视图与模式相关,但当前的工具并没有提供一种方法来预测哪些探索路径值得采取,哪些不值得采取。在本文中,我们提出了一组包模式,用于通过各种探索路径的价值信息来扩展探索过程。模式是基于内部包结构以及包与系统中其他包之间的关系来定义的。为了验证我们的方法,我们通过分析它们在六个开源软件项目中的出现频率来验证所建议的模式与现实世界系统的相关性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Package patterns for visual architecture recovery
Recovering the architecture is the first step towards reengineering a software system. Many reverse engineering tools use top-down exploration as a way of providing a visual and interactive process for architecture recovery. During the exploration process, the user navigates through various views on the system by choosing from several exploration operations. Although some sequences of these operations lead to views which, from the architectural point of view, are mode relevant than others, current tools do not provide a way of predicting which exploration paths are worth taking and which are not. In this article, we propose a set of package patterns which are used for augmenting the exploration process with information about the worthiness of the various exploration paths. The patterns are defined based on the internal package structure and on the relationships between the package and the other packages in the system. To validate our approach, we verify the relevance of the proposed patterns for real-world systems by analyzing their frequency of occurrence in six open-source software projects
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative framework for design recovery tools Package patterns for visual architecture recovery A flexible wrapper for the migration of interactive legacy system to Web services Search-based software maintenance Realistic load testing of Web applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1