自我在学术档案服务中的作用:比较Google Scholar、ResearchGate、Mendeley和ResearcherID

Alberto Martín-Martín, E. Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
{"title":"自我在学术档案服务中的作用:比较Google Scholar、ResearchGate、Mendeley和ResearcherID","authors":"Alberto Martín-Martín, E. Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2745892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic profiling services are a pervasive feature of scholarly life. Alberto Martin-Martin, Enrique Orduna-Malea and Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar discuss the advantages and disadvantages of major profile platforms and look at the role of ego in how these services are built and used. Scholars validate these services by using them and should be aware that the portraits shown in these platforms depend to a great extent on the characteristics of the “mirrors” themselves.","PeriodicalId":276560,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"381 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Ego in Academic Profile Services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Martín-Martín, E. Orduña-Malea, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2745892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic profiling services are a pervasive feature of scholarly life. Alberto Martin-Martin, Enrique Orduna-Malea and Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar discuss the advantages and disadvantages of major profile platforms and look at the role of ego in how these services are built and used. Scholars validate these services by using them and should be aware that the portraits shown in these platforms depend to a great extent on the characteristics of the “mirrors” themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Innovation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"381 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Innovation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2745892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2745892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

学术档案服务是学术生活的一个普遍特征。Alberto Martin-Martin、Enrique Orduna-Malea和Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar讨论了主要概要平台的优缺点,并探讨了自我在这些服务的构建和使用中的作用。学者们通过使用这些服务来验证这些服务,并且应该意识到,这些平台上展示的肖像在很大程度上取决于“镜子”本身的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Ego in Academic Profile Services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID
Academic profiling services are a pervasive feature of scholarly life. Alberto Martin-Martin, Enrique Orduna-Malea and Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar discuss the advantages and disadvantages of major profile platforms and look at the role of ego in how these services are built and used. Scholars validate these services by using them and should be aware that the portraits shown in these platforms depend to a great extent on the characteristics of the “mirrors” themselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Subscription Reciprocity on Charitable Content Creation and Sharing: Evidence from Twitter on Giving Tuesday The Impact of Whatsapp on EFL Students' Vocabulary Learning The Moral Psychology of Value Sensitive Design: The Methodological Issues of Moral Intuitions for Responsible Innovation Cognition in Design Management. At the Intersection of Conceptual Innovation and Design Thinking Loss Aversion Around a Fixed Reference Point in Highly Experienced Agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1