学术和工业软件测试会议:调查和协同

Árpád Beszédes, László Vidács
{"title":"学术和工业软件测试会议:调查和协同","authors":"Árpád Beszédes, László Vidács","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW.2016.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just as with any other profession, an efficient way to exchange ideas and networking in software testing are conferences, workshops and similar events. This is true for both professional testers and researchers working in the testing area. However, these two groups usually look for different kinds of events: a tester likes to attend 'industrial' (sometimes called practitioner's or user) conferences, whereas a researcher is more likely interested in 'academic' (in other words scientific or research) conferences. Although there are notable exceptions, this separation is substantial, which hinders a successful academy-industry collaboration, and communication about the demand and supply of research in software testing. This paper reviews 101 conferences: two thirds are academic ones, the rest being industrial. Besides providing this reasonably comprehensive list, we analyze any visible synergies such as events that have a mixed Program Committee and offer a program with elements from both sides. We found only a handful of such events, but these can serve both as opportunities for attendees who wish to extend their perspectives and as models for organizers of future conferences.","PeriodicalId":335145,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic and Industrial Software Testing Conferences: Survey and Synergies\",\"authors\":\"Árpád Beszédes, László Vidács\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTW.2016.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Just as with any other profession, an efficient way to exchange ideas and networking in software testing are conferences, workshops and similar events. This is true for both professional testers and researchers working in the testing area. However, these two groups usually look for different kinds of events: a tester likes to attend 'industrial' (sometimes called practitioner's or user) conferences, whereas a researcher is more likely interested in 'academic' (in other words scientific or research) conferences. Although there are notable exceptions, this separation is substantial, which hinders a successful academy-industry collaboration, and communication about the demand and supply of research in software testing. This paper reviews 101 conferences: two thirds are academic ones, the rest being industrial. Besides providing this reasonably comprehensive list, we analyze any visible synergies such as events that have a mixed Program Committee and offer a program with elements from both sides. We found only a handful of such events, but these can serve both as opportunities for attendees who wish to extend their perspectives and as models for organizers of future conferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

就像任何其他职业一样,在软件测试中交流想法和网络的有效方式是会议、研讨会和类似的活动。对于在测试领域工作的专业测试人员和研究人员来说都是如此。然而,这两个群体通常寻找不同类型的事件:测试人员喜欢参加“工业”(有时称为从业者或用户)会议,而研究人员更可能对“学术”(换句话说,科学或研究)会议感兴趣。尽管有明显的例外,但这种分离是实质性的,它阻碍了成功的学院-工业合作,以及关于软件测试研究的需求和供应的沟通。本文回顾了101次会议,其中三分之二为学术会议,其余为工业会议。除了提供这个相当全面的列表外,我们还分析了任何可见的协同作用,例如有一个混合项目委员会的活动,并提供一个包含双方元素的项目。我们只发现了少数这样的活动,但这些活动既可以为希望扩展视野的与会者提供机会,也可以为未来会议的组织者提供榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic and Industrial Software Testing Conferences: Survey and Synergies
Just as with any other profession, an efficient way to exchange ideas and networking in software testing are conferences, workshops and similar events. This is true for both professional testers and researchers working in the testing area. However, these two groups usually look for different kinds of events: a tester likes to attend 'industrial' (sometimes called practitioner's or user) conferences, whereas a researcher is more likely interested in 'academic' (in other words scientific or research) conferences. Although there are notable exceptions, this separation is substantial, which hinders a successful academy-industry collaboration, and communication about the demand and supply of research in software testing. This paper reviews 101 conferences: two thirds are academic ones, the rest being industrial. Besides providing this reasonably comprehensive list, we analyze any visible synergies such as events that have a mixed Program Committee and offer a program with elements from both sides. We found only a handful of such events, but these can serve both as opportunities for attendees who wish to extend their perspectives and as models for organizers of future conferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nequivack: Assessing Mutation Score Confidence A Tool for Automated Inspection of Software Design Documents and Its Empirical Evaluation in an Aviation Industry Setting Difference in Quality of Test Architecture between Service Providers and Subcontractors Diversity-Aware Mutation Adequacy Criterion for Improving Fault Detection Capability Are We There Yet? How Redundant and Equivalent Mutants Affect Determination of Test Completeness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1