2000年英国社论对土耳其的描述:《卫报》、《金融时报》和《每日电讯报》的分析tÜrkİye 'nİn İngİlİz baŞyazilarinda tasvİr edİlme bİÇİmlerİ:《卫报》、《金融时报》和《每日电讯报》İncelemesİ

Nilüfer Türksoy
{"title":"2000年英国社论对土耳其的描述:《卫报》、《金融时报》和《每日电讯报》的分析tÜrkİye 'nİn İngİlİz baŞyazilarinda tasvİr edİlme bİÇİmlerİ:《卫报》、《金融时报》和《每日电讯报》İncelemesİ","authors":"Nilüfer Türksoy","doi":"10.17932/iau.icd.2015.006/icd_v08i1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A leading article or editorial is an opinion piece written by the editorial staff of a newspaper and represents the opinion of the publisher. This study examines the portrayal of Turkey as presented within the broad context of political media discourse in the leading articles of three influential British quality newspapers: the Guardian, the Financial Times, and the Daily Telegraph, between 2005 and 2010. The aim is to find out what arguments/issues the editorials cover in favour of or against Turkey, and whether Turkey’s multi-dimensional EastWest transformation has influenced the political discourses and the nature of news in the British press. A qualitative content analysis was performed on three newspapers’ leading articles. Findings indicate that although editorial staff of British conservative, labour, and liberal press had a great deal to talk about apparently different subjects that constitute comments on Turkey’s turbulent relationship with the European Union, or its human rights record, unending debate on secularism versus Islamist politics or lack of ethnic minority rights domestically; at the same time, they had created a rather positive, constructive and consistent political image of Turkey, by portraying the country as a rather democratic, secular, Muslim state that can create a bridge between the West and the Middle East in international affairs.","PeriodicalId":204059,"journal":{"name":"İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi iletişim çalışmaları dergisi","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BRITISH EDITORIALS PORTRAYAL OF TURKEY DURING THE 2000S: AN ANALYSIS OF THE GUARDIAN, THE FINANCIAL TIMES, AND THE DAILY TELEGRAPH 2000’LERDE TÜRKİYE’NİN İNGİLİZ BAŞYAZILARINDA TASVİR EDİLME BİÇİMLERİ: THE GUARDIAN, THE FINANCIAL TIMES VE THE DAILY TELEGRAPH İNCELEMESİ\",\"authors\":\"Nilüfer Türksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.17932/iau.icd.2015.006/icd_v08i1004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A leading article or editorial is an opinion piece written by the editorial staff of a newspaper and represents the opinion of the publisher. This study examines the portrayal of Turkey as presented within the broad context of political media discourse in the leading articles of three influential British quality newspapers: the Guardian, the Financial Times, and the Daily Telegraph, between 2005 and 2010. The aim is to find out what arguments/issues the editorials cover in favour of or against Turkey, and whether Turkey’s multi-dimensional EastWest transformation has influenced the political discourses and the nature of news in the British press. A qualitative content analysis was performed on three newspapers’ leading articles. Findings indicate that although editorial staff of British conservative, labour, and liberal press had a great deal to talk about apparently different subjects that constitute comments on Turkey’s turbulent relationship with the European Union, or its human rights record, unending debate on secularism versus Islamist politics or lack of ethnic minority rights domestically; at the same time, they had created a rather positive, constructive and consistent political image of Turkey, by portraying the country as a rather democratic, secular, Muslim state that can create a bridge between the West and the Middle East in international affairs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi iletişim çalışmaları dergisi\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi iletişim çalışmaları dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17932/iau.icd.2015.006/icd_v08i1004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi iletişim çalışmaları dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17932/iau.icd.2015.006/icd_v08i1004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要文章或社论是由报纸编辑人员撰写的观点文章,代表出版商的观点。本研究考察了2005年至2010年间,三家有影响力的英国优质报纸《卫报》、《金融时报》和《每日电讯报》的主要文章在政治媒体话语的大背景下对土耳其的描绘。目的是找出社论所涵盖的论点/议题是支持还是反对土耳其,以及土耳其的多元东西转型是否影响了英国新闻界的政治话语和新闻性质。对三家报纸的主要文章进行了定性内容分析。调查结果表明,尽管英国保守派、工党和自由派媒体的编辑人员对土耳其与欧盟的动荡关系或其人权记录的评论有很多明显不同的主题,对世俗主义与伊斯兰政治或国内少数民族权利缺乏的无休止的辩论;与此同时,他们创造了一个相当积极、建设性和一致的土耳其政治形象,将土耳其描绘成一个相当民主、世俗的穆斯林国家,在国际事务中可以在西方和中东之间架起一座桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRITISH EDITORIALS PORTRAYAL OF TURKEY DURING THE 2000S: AN ANALYSIS OF THE GUARDIAN, THE FINANCIAL TIMES, AND THE DAILY TELEGRAPH 2000’LERDE TÜRKİYE’NİN İNGİLİZ BAŞYAZILARINDA TASVİR EDİLME BİÇİMLERİ: THE GUARDIAN, THE FINANCIAL TIMES VE THE DAILY TELEGRAPH İNCELEMESİ
A leading article or editorial is an opinion piece written by the editorial staff of a newspaper and represents the opinion of the publisher. This study examines the portrayal of Turkey as presented within the broad context of political media discourse in the leading articles of three influential British quality newspapers: the Guardian, the Financial Times, and the Daily Telegraph, between 2005 and 2010. The aim is to find out what arguments/issues the editorials cover in favour of or against Turkey, and whether Turkey’s multi-dimensional EastWest transformation has influenced the political discourses and the nature of news in the British press. A qualitative content analysis was performed on three newspapers’ leading articles. Findings indicate that although editorial staff of British conservative, labour, and liberal press had a great deal to talk about apparently different subjects that constitute comments on Turkey’s turbulent relationship with the European Union, or its human rights record, unending debate on secularism versus Islamist politics or lack of ethnic minority rights domestically; at the same time, they had created a rather positive, constructive and consistent political image of Turkey, by portraying the country as a rather democratic, secular, Muslim state that can create a bridge between the West and the Middle East in international affairs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DİJİTAL PLATFORM NETFLİX’İN LA CASA DE PAPEL DİZİSİNDE ÇAPRAZ MEDYA STRATEJİSİNİN İNŞASI THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CROSS-MEDIA STRATEGY OF THE DIGITAL PLATFORM NETFLIX IN LA CASA DE PAPEL SERIES MİTOLOJİDEN HAKİKAT SONRASI ÇAĞA: SANATIN HYPERTEXT EVRENİ FROM MYTHOLOGY TO THE POST-TRUTH AGE: THE HYPERTEXT UNIVERSE OF ART NURİ BİLGE CEYLAN SİNEMASINDA TARKOVSKY ÖYKÜNMESİ TARKOVSKY EMULATION AT NURİ BİLGE CEYLAN’S CİNEMA SİBER SUÇLAR, SOSYAL MEDYA VE SİBER ETİK CYBERCRIME, SOCIAL MEDIA AND CYBER ETHICS MEDYA VE KADIN CİNAYETLERİ; ÇANAKKALE YEREL MEDYA ÖRNEĞİ MEDIA AND FEMICIDE: LOCAL MEDIA EXAMPLE OF ÇANAKKALE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1