土耳其COVID-19压力量表效度和信度(css)

Rabia Çağlayan, Serpil Özdemir
{"title":"土耳其COVID-19压力量表效度和信度(css)","authors":"Rabia Çağlayan, Serpil Özdemir","doi":"10.52831/kjhs.1186499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: It is considered that evaluation of the stress level, in crisis situations, will provide a valuable source of the crisis intervention. The aim of the study was to test the Turkish validity and reliability of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. \nMethod: This methodological study was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 with 841 nursing students and online. The data collection form included socio-demographical characteristics of the participants, COVID-19 Stress Scales, Perceived Stress Scale, Scale of Fear of COVID-19, and Scale of Coronavirus Phobia. Translations and intercultural adaptation process were used for the Turkish version of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. Content, construct and criterion validity analyzes were performed for the validity of the Scale. Internal consistency and intra-class correlation coefficients values were calculated for the reliability of the scale. \nResults: The mean age of the participants was 23.63±8.5. The Content Validity Index of the COVID-19 Stress Scales was calculated as 0.98. According to suggestions of the experts, the subscale of \"xenophobia\" was excluded from the scale. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis, fit indices were calculated at acceptable levels and good fits. The five factors were reported in the original study of the scale, was confirmed in the Turkish version. The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 for the scale total. Strong and positive correlations was found between the test and retest scores of the total scale (ICC=0.799; p=0.001). \nConclusion: COVID-19 Stress Scales with 30 items and five subscales was a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish society.","PeriodicalId":212263,"journal":{"name":"Karya Journal of Health Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TURKISH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF COVID-19 STRESS SCALES (CSS)\",\"authors\":\"Rabia Çağlayan, Serpil Özdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.52831/kjhs.1186499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: It is considered that evaluation of the stress level, in crisis situations, will provide a valuable source of the crisis intervention. The aim of the study was to test the Turkish validity and reliability of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. \\nMethod: This methodological study was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 with 841 nursing students and online. The data collection form included socio-demographical characteristics of the participants, COVID-19 Stress Scales, Perceived Stress Scale, Scale of Fear of COVID-19, and Scale of Coronavirus Phobia. Translations and intercultural adaptation process were used for the Turkish version of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. Content, construct and criterion validity analyzes were performed for the validity of the Scale. Internal consistency and intra-class correlation coefficients values were calculated for the reliability of the scale. \\nResults: The mean age of the participants was 23.63±8.5. The Content Validity Index of the COVID-19 Stress Scales was calculated as 0.98. According to suggestions of the experts, the subscale of \\\"xenophobia\\\" was excluded from the scale. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis, fit indices were calculated at acceptable levels and good fits. The five factors were reported in the original study of the scale, was confirmed in the Turkish version. The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 for the scale total. Strong and positive correlations was found between the test and retest scores of the total scale (ICC=0.799; p=0.001). \\nConclusion: COVID-19 Stress Scales with 30 items and five subscales was a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karya Journal of Health Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karya Journal of Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1186499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karya Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1186499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在危机情况下,对压力水平的评估将为危机干预提供有价值的来源。该研究的目的是测试COVID-19压力量表在土耳其的有效性和可靠性。方法:于2020年12月至2021年1月对841名护理专业学生进行方法学研究。数据收集表包括参与者的社会人口学特征、COVID-19压力量表、感知压力量表、COVID-19恐惧量表和冠状病毒恐惧症量表。土耳其版COVID-19压力量表采用了翻译和跨文化适应过程。对量表的内容、结构和效度进行了效度分析。计算量表的内部一致性和类内相关系数值以确定量表的信度。结果:参与者平均年龄23.63±8.5岁。COVID-19压力量表的内容效度指数计算为0.98。根据专家们的建议,将“仇外心理”分表从该比额表中剔除。在验证性因子分析中,拟合指数在可接受水平和良好拟合下计算。这五个因素是在最初的量表研究中报告的,在土耳其版本中得到证实。量表总分的Cronbach’s α值为0.94。总量表的测试分数与重测分数呈显著正相关(ICC=0.799;p = 0.001)。结论:采用30项5分量表的新冠肺炎压力量表是土耳其社会有效可靠的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TURKISH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF COVID-19 STRESS SCALES (CSS)
Objective: It is considered that evaluation of the stress level, in crisis situations, will provide a valuable source of the crisis intervention. The aim of the study was to test the Turkish validity and reliability of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. Method: This methodological study was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 with 841 nursing students and online. The data collection form included socio-demographical characteristics of the participants, COVID-19 Stress Scales, Perceived Stress Scale, Scale of Fear of COVID-19, and Scale of Coronavirus Phobia. Translations and intercultural adaptation process were used for the Turkish version of the COVID-19 Stress Scales. Content, construct and criterion validity analyzes were performed for the validity of the Scale. Internal consistency and intra-class correlation coefficients values were calculated for the reliability of the scale. Results: The mean age of the participants was 23.63±8.5. The Content Validity Index of the COVID-19 Stress Scales was calculated as 0.98. According to suggestions of the experts, the subscale of "xenophobia" was excluded from the scale. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis, fit indices were calculated at acceptable levels and good fits. The five factors were reported in the original study of the scale, was confirmed in the Turkish version. The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 for the scale total. Strong and positive correlations was found between the test and retest scores of the total scale (ICC=0.799; p=0.001). Conclusion: COVID-19 Stress Scales with 30 items and five subscales was a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Incentive Spirometry and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapies on Functional Capacity, Dyspnea, and Saturation in Burn Patients with Inhalation Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL GAME ADDICTION ON AGGRESSION IN SCHOOLAGE CHILDREN Kronik Boyun Ağrısında Servikal Stabilizasyon Egzersizleri ile Kombine Edilen Mulligan Mobilizasyon Tekniğinin Etkilerinin Tek Başına Servikal Stabilizasyon Egzersizlerinin Etkileri ile Karşılaştırılması: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma LAPAROSKOPİK SLEEVE GASTREKTOMİ SONRASI BESLENME KALİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ İNMELİ HASTALARDA EKSPİRATUAR KAS EĞİTİMİNİN STOMATOGNATİK SİSTEME ETKİSİ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1