与医院癌细胞和抑郁程度的变化:改变前和变化能力

A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5
{"title":"与医院癌细胞和抑郁程度的变化:改变前和变化能力","authors":"A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5","doi":"10.1055/s-2008-1067578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.","PeriodicalId":345802,"journal":{"name":"Psychother Psych Med","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität\",\"authors\":\"A. Hinz1, Uta Zweynert2, Jörg Kittel3, Wilmar Igl4, Reinhold Schwarz †5\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2008-1067578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychother Psych Med\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychother Psych Med\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1067578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychother Psych Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1067578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

! 对问卷变化的反应性或敏感性是评估医疗干预效果的一个重要标准。在文献中,根据人口平均值的变化,有几种反应性标准。在这里,我们提出了一种替代方法来测量变化(变化可靠性),将内部一致性的标准应用于变化分数。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),这些方法在包括901名肿瘤患者和2695名心脏病患者的2个受试者样本中得到验证和比较。基于样本均值的变化,效应大小d非常适合于评估干预的效果。对这两个样本的分析得出的效应值约为0.25。新建立的变化信度系数约为0.70,表明焦虑和抑郁的个体变化的信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität
! Responsiveness or sensitivity to change of a questionnaire is an important criterion in the as− sessment of the effect of a medical intervention. In the literature there are several criteria for re− sponsiveness, based on changes in the popula− tion mean. Here we present an alternative ap− proach for the measurement of change (change reliability), applying the criteria of internal con− sistency to change scores. Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS, these ap− proaches are demonstrated and compared for 2 subject samples, comprising 901 oncologic pa− tients and 2695 cardiac patients. The effect size d is well suited to assess the effect of an interven− tion, based on changes of the sample mean. The analyses of the 2 samples yielded effect sizes of about 0.25. The newly created change reliability yielded coefficients of about .70 which indicate the reliability of the individual changes in anxie− ty and depression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nachruf auf Prof. Dr. med. Jörg Michael Herrmann „Psychotherapeutische Forschung und psychosomatische Praxis” In eigener Sache Langzeitstudierende als Klienten psychotherapeutischer Beratung Veränderungsmessung mit der Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Änderungssensitivität und Änderungsreliabilität
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1