行动和预防的义务:根据STF在MP nº966/2020的合宪性判决中确立的论点进行分析

Eduardo Fernandes
{"title":"行动和预防的义务:根据STF在MP nº966/2020的合宪性判决中确立的论点进行分析","authors":"Eduardo Fernandes","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以STF所确定的论文所进行的参数化为目标,即在为应对covid -19大流行的卫生和经济发展而制定的公共政策背景下,什么是严重错误。反过来,我们的目标是讨论考虑到STF关于预防原则的适用的判例,如何解释既定的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF
This article has for object the parameterization undertaken by the thesis fixed by the STF as to what is a gross error in the context of public policies developed to face the sanitary and economic developments of the Civid-19 pandemic. In turn, the objective is to debate how the established thesis tend to be interpreted considering of the STF's jurisprudence regarding the application of the precautionary principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incompletude em contratos de concessão: ainda a teoria da imprevisão?* Procedimentos probatórios autônomos como instrumentos de acertamento fático e fomento ao consenso – breve análise das inovações trazidas pelo art. 381 do novo Código de Processo Civil Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF Direito em tempos de crise: o que as contratações públicas podem aprender com a pandemia de COVID-19 O exercício das funções da advocacia pública como atividade exclusiva dos advogados públicos efetivos: uma releitura da Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 18 do STF à luz dos dados publicados no 1º Diagnóstico de Advocacia Pública Municipal no Brasil (2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1