在没有国家强制的情况下保护人权规范

Fredys Orlando Sorto, Gilvânklim Marques de Lima
{"title":"在没有国家强制的情况下保护人权规范","authors":"Fredys Orlando Sorto, Gilvânklim Marques de Lima","doi":"10.5020/2317-2150.2021.11403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study, divided into seven chapters, aims to investigate the legal nature of Human Rights norms whose implementation is not immediately supported by state coercion. As to the research problem, the legal nature and purpose of Human Rights norms that have such characteristics are questioned. The initial hypothesis is centered on the assertion that Human Rights norms not supported by state coercive protection have the nature of legal promises only and are intended to cushion conflicts within society, keeping the unassisted groups in a state of inertia, on the expectation that, in the future, they will be beneficiaries of what is only promised to them at the moment. The research was guided by the application of the method of deductive approach, initially investigating the general concepts of what we call Law in the strict sense, using mainly the studies of Derrida, Douzinas, Kelsen and Hart, which support that there is no law unless it is supported by state coercive force.","PeriodicalId":141457,"journal":{"name":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The protection of Human Rights norms without State coercion\",\"authors\":\"Fredys Orlando Sorto, Gilvânklim Marques de Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.5020/2317-2150.2021.11403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study, divided into seven chapters, aims to investigate the legal nature of Human Rights norms whose implementation is not immediately supported by state coercion. As to the research problem, the legal nature and purpose of Human Rights norms that have such characteristics are questioned. The initial hypothesis is centered on the assertion that Human Rights norms not supported by state coercive protection have the nature of legal promises only and are intended to cushion conflicts within society, keeping the unassisted groups in a state of inertia, on the expectation that, in the future, they will be beneficiaries of what is only promised to them at the moment. The research was guided by the application of the method of deductive approach, initially investigating the general concepts of what we call Law in the strict sense, using mainly the studies of Derrida, Douzinas, Kelsen and Hart, which support that there is no law unless it is supported by state coercive force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2021.11403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2021.11403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分为七章,旨在探讨人权规范的法律性质,这些规范的实施没有立即得到国家强制的支持。在研究问题上,具有这些特征的人权规范的法律性质和目的受到质疑。最初的假设集中在这样一种主张上,即不受国家强制保护支持的人权规范仅具有法律承诺的性质,其目的是缓冲社会内部的冲突,使得不到援助的群体处于一种惰性状态,期望在未来,他们将成为目前只向他们承诺的东西的受益者。该研究以演绎方法的应用为指导,最初调查了我们所谓严格意义上的法律的一般概念,主要使用德里达,杜齐纳斯,凯尔森和哈特的研究,这些研究支持除非有国家强制力量的支持,否则就没有法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The protection of Human Rights norms without State coercion
The present study, divided into seven chapters, aims to investigate the legal nature of Human Rights norms whose implementation is not immediately supported by state coercion. As to the research problem, the legal nature and purpose of Human Rights norms that have such characteristics are questioned. The initial hypothesis is centered on the assertion that Human Rights norms not supported by state coercive protection have the nature of legal promises only and are intended to cushion conflicts within society, keeping the unassisted groups in a state of inertia, on the expectation that, in the future, they will be beneficiaries of what is only promised to them at the moment. The research was guided by the application of the method of deductive approach, initially investigating the general concepts of what we call Law in the strict sense, using mainly the studies of Derrida, Douzinas, Kelsen and Hart, which support that there is no law unless it is supported by state coercive force.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Um constitucionalismo integral para o antropoceno Reflexiones en torno a la Trans-dis-capacidad A cláusula solve et repete como mecanismo de gestão dos riscos contratuais: contornos e limites no direito brasileiro Decido assim porque a sociedade pensa assim: a relação simbiótica estabelecida entre apelo social, midiatização de casos e a tomada de decisões discricionárias em Direito O desamparo dos idosos em situação de rua: estado exceção diante das violações dos direitos da personalidade e inefetividade das políticas públicas de promoção humana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1