玛丽埃尔·佛朗哥的谋杀:社会思想中两极分化的社会心理视角

Angela Arruda, Karina Abrahim, Anderson Penavilla de Oliveira, Renata Queiroz Ramos, Hakumi Mori
{"title":"玛丽埃尔·佛朗哥的谋杀:社会思想中两极分化的社会心理视角","authors":"Angela Arruda, Karina Abrahim, Anderson Penavilla de Oliveira, Renata Queiroz Ramos, Hakumi Mori","doi":"10.1590/1807-0310/2022v34253657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper analyzes on line comments from Brazilian newspaper “ O Dia ” following the murder of Marielle Franco and Anderson Gomes. Analyze polarization in this material. Analysis was based on polarization studies by Martín-Baró, Lozada, Villa Gómez, besides those on social thinking by Moscovici and Jodelet. 1330 comments from 40 articles were submitted to the IRaMuTeQ software and complementary content analyses. The content analysis pointed out the categories: characterization of the victim, of the death, of the killer, and showed how they interconnect. Polarization centered on the city’s problems, and issues such as human rights and same sex marriage, with a conservative bias. The most thought-provoking findings were the denials of the existence of racism; discrete indications that polarization has various tones and intensities; the asymmetric polarization, with a predominance on the conservative pole; and the right wing as a possible active minority that tries to influence the change of common sense in progress.","PeriodicalId":104149,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia & Sociedade","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O ASSASSINATO DE MARIELLE FRANCO: OLHAR PSICOSSOCIAL SOBRE POLARIZAÇÃO EM UM RECORTE DO PENSAMENTO SOCIAL\",\"authors\":\"Angela Arruda, Karina Abrahim, Anderson Penavilla de Oliveira, Renata Queiroz Ramos, Hakumi Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-0310/2022v34253657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper analyzes on line comments from Brazilian newspaper “ O Dia ” following the murder of Marielle Franco and Anderson Gomes. Analyze polarization in this material. Analysis was based on polarization studies by Martín-Baró, Lozada, Villa Gómez, besides those on social thinking by Moscovici and Jodelet. 1330 comments from 40 articles were submitted to the IRaMuTeQ software and complementary content analyses. The content analysis pointed out the categories: characterization of the victim, of the death, of the killer, and showed how they interconnect. Polarization centered on the city’s problems, and issues such as human rights and same sex marriage, with a conservative bias. The most thought-provoking findings were the denials of the existence of racism; discrete indications that polarization has various tones and intensities; the asymmetric polarization, with a predominance on the conservative pole; and the right wing as a possible active minority that tries to influence the change of common sense in progress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia & Sociedade\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia & Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2022v34253657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia & Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2022v34253657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了巴西报纸《O Dia》在玛丽埃尔·佛朗哥和安德森·戈麦斯被谋杀后的网上评论。分析这种材料的极化。分析基于Martín-Baró、Lozada、Villa Gómez的极化研究,以及Moscovici和Jodelet的社会思维研究,共向IRaMuTeQ软件提交了40篇文章中的1330条评论,并进行了补充内容分析。内容分析指出了受害者、死亡和凶手的分类,并展示了它们之间的相互联系。两极分化集中在城市的问题上,以及人权和同性婚姻等问题上,带有保守的偏见。最发人深省的发现是否认种族主义的存在;两极分化具有不同音调和强度的离散迹象;不对称极化,以保守极为主;而右翼可能是一个活跃的少数群体,试图影响正在进行的常识变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O ASSASSINATO DE MARIELLE FRANCO: OLHAR PSICOSSOCIAL SOBRE POLARIZAÇÃO EM UM RECORTE DO PENSAMENTO SOCIAL
: This paper analyzes on line comments from Brazilian newspaper “ O Dia ” following the murder of Marielle Franco and Anderson Gomes. Analyze polarization in this material. Analysis was based on polarization studies by Martín-Baró, Lozada, Villa Gómez, besides those on social thinking by Moscovici and Jodelet. 1330 comments from 40 articles were submitted to the IRaMuTeQ software and complementary content analyses. The content analysis pointed out the categories: characterization of the victim, of the death, of the killer, and showed how they interconnect. Polarization centered on the city’s problems, and issues such as human rights and same sex marriage, with a conservative bias. The most thought-provoking findings were the denials of the existence of racism; discrete indications that polarization has various tones and intensities; the asymmetric polarization, with a predominance on the conservative pole; and the right wing as a possible active minority that tries to influence the change of common sense in progress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
O ASSASSINATO DE MARIELLE FRANCO: OLHAR PSICOSSOCIAL SOBRE POLARIZAÇÃO EM UM RECORTE DO PENSAMENTO SOCIAL ACTIVIST TRAJECTORIES OF OLDER WOMEN IN POST-DICTATORSHIP CHILE LA JUVENTUD Y EL PASADO RECIENTE DE CHILE: LA (DES)POLITIZACIÓN COMO POLÍTICA DE MEMORIA COTIDIANA NEOLIBERALISMO E A CONSTRUÇÃO DO SUJEITO CRIATIVO O PODER (NEURO)PSIQUIÁTRICO: A PSICOPATOLOGIZAÇÃO DO COTIDIANO NA ERA DO CÉREBRO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1